Cargando…

Excellent oncological outcomes besides short-term safety of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor

Background and study aims  Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) for gastric submucosal tumor was developed as a type of minimal local resection and is now widely used in Asian countries. However, the oncological safety of LECS for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) remai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harada, Hiroki, Ohashi, Manabu, Hiki, Naoki, Fujisaki, Junko, Hirasawa, Toshiaki, Yamamoto, Yorimasa, Makuuchi, Rie, Ida, Satoshi, Hayami, Masaru, Kumagai, Koshi, Sano, Takeshi, Nunobe, Souya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9473822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36118650
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1895-9507
_version_ 1784789579230871552
author Harada, Hiroki
Ohashi, Manabu
Hiki, Naoki
Fujisaki, Junko
Hirasawa, Toshiaki
Yamamoto, Yorimasa
Makuuchi, Rie
Ida, Satoshi
Hayami, Masaru
Kumagai, Koshi
Sano, Takeshi
Nunobe, Souya
author_facet Harada, Hiroki
Ohashi, Manabu
Hiki, Naoki
Fujisaki, Junko
Hirasawa, Toshiaki
Yamamoto, Yorimasa
Makuuchi, Rie
Ida, Satoshi
Hayami, Masaru
Kumagai, Koshi
Sano, Takeshi
Nunobe, Souya
author_sort Harada, Hiroki
collection PubMed
description Background and study aims  Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) for gastric submucosal tumor was developed as a type of minimal local resection and is now widely used in Asian countries. However, the oncological safety of LECS for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) remains unclear. LECS has potential oncology-related problems that may influence survival outcomes. Furthermore, the feasibility and safety of LECS have not yet been fully established. Patients and methods  Patients who were intended to undergo LECS for gastric GIST from 2006 to 2020 were retrospectively selected. The indication for LECS was determined according to the guidelines. The completion of LECS, complications, and survival outcomes of the patients were analyzed. Results  Two hundred fifty-nine patients were eligible in this study. According to intraoperative findings, 44 patients underwent local resection without luminal endoscopic procedures. Of the remaining 215 patients, 213 completely underwent LECS, which corresponds to a completion rate of 99.1 %. Six patients (2.8 %) had postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo classification grade II or higher. Delayed gastric emptying was most commonly found in four patients (1.9 %). Old age ( P  = 0.0349), female sex ( P  = 0.0095), tumor located in the lesser curvature ( P  = 0.0015), and large tumor diameter ( P  = 0.0232) were significantly more common in patients with complications. The 3-year overall and disease-specific survival rates were 99 % and 100 %, respectively, in 215 patients who were intended to undergo LECS. Conclusions  Despite several oncological concerns, LECS for gastric GIST is oncologically safe besides a feasible and safe procedure in the short-term.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9473822
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94738222022-09-15 Excellent oncological outcomes besides short-term safety of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor Harada, Hiroki Ohashi, Manabu Hiki, Naoki Fujisaki, Junko Hirasawa, Toshiaki Yamamoto, Yorimasa Makuuchi, Rie Ida, Satoshi Hayami, Masaru Kumagai, Koshi Sano, Takeshi Nunobe, Souya Endosc Int Open Background and study aims  Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) for gastric submucosal tumor was developed as a type of minimal local resection and is now widely used in Asian countries. However, the oncological safety of LECS for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) remains unclear. LECS has potential oncology-related problems that may influence survival outcomes. Furthermore, the feasibility and safety of LECS have not yet been fully established. Patients and methods  Patients who were intended to undergo LECS for gastric GIST from 2006 to 2020 were retrospectively selected. The indication for LECS was determined according to the guidelines. The completion of LECS, complications, and survival outcomes of the patients were analyzed. Results  Two hundred fifty-nine patients were eligible in this study. According to intraoperative findings, 44 patients underwent local resection without luminal endoscopic procedures. Of the remaining 215 patients, 213 completely underwent LECS, which corresponds to a completion rate of 99.1 %. Six patients (2.8 %) had postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo classification grade II or higher. Delayed gastric emptying was most commonly found in four patients (1.9 %). Old age ( P  = 0.0349), female sex ( P  = 0.0095), tumor located in the lesser curvature ( P  = 0.0015), and large tumor diameter ( P  = 0.0232) were significantly more common in patients with complications. The 3-year overall and disease-specific survival rates were 99 % and 100 %, respectively, in 215 patients who were intended to undergo LECS. Conclusions  Despite several oncological concerns, LECS for gastric GIST is oncologically safe besides a feasible and safe procedure in the short-term. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2022-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9473822/ /pubmed/36118650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1895-9507 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Harada, Hiroki
Ohashi, Manabu
Hiki, Naoki
Fujisaki, Junko
Hirasawa, Toshiaki
Yamamoto, Yorimasa
Makuuchi, Rie
Ida, Satoshi
Hayami, Masaru
Kumagai, Koshi
Sano, Takeshi
Nunobe, Souya
Excellent oncological outcomes besides short-term safety of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor
title Excellent oncological outcomes besides short-term safety of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor
title_full Excellent oncological outcomes besides short-term safety of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor
title_fullStr Excellent oncological outcomes besides short-term safety of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor
title_full_unstemmed Excellent oncological outcomes besides short-term safety of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor
title_short Excellent oncological outcomes besides short-term safety of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor
title_sort excellent oncological outcomes besides short-term safety of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9473822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36118650
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1895-9507
work_keys_str_mv AT haradahiroki excellentoncologicaloutcomesbesidesshorttermsafetyoflaparoscopicandendoscopiccooperativesurgeryforgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumor
AT ohashimanabu excellentoncologicaloutcomesbesidesshorttermsafetyoflaparoscopicandendoscopiccooperativesurgeryforgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumor
AT hikinaoki excellentoncologicaloutcomesbesidesshorttermsafetyoflaparoscopicandendoscopiccooperativesurgeryforgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumor
AT fujisakijunko excellentoncologicaloutcomesbesidesshorttermsafetyoflaparoscopicandendoscopiccooperativesurgeryforgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumor
AT hirasawatoshiaki excellentoncologicaloutcomesbesidesshorttermsafetyoflaparoscopicandendoscopiccooperativesurgeryforgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumor
AT yamamotoyorimasa excellentoncologicaloutcomesbesidesshorttermsafetyoflaparoscopicandendoscopiccooperativesurgeryforgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumor
AT makuuchirie excellentoncologicaloutcomesbesidesshorttermsafetyoflaparoscopicandendoscopiccooperativesurgeryforgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumor
AT idasatoshi excellentoncologicaloutcomesbesidesshorttermsafetyoflaparoscopicandendoscopiccooperativesurgeryforgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumor
AT hayamimasaru excellentoncologicaloutcomesbesidesshorttermsafetyoflaparoscopicandendoscopiccooperativesurgeryforgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumor
AT kumagaikoshi excellentoncologicaloutcomesbesidesshorttermsafetyoflaparoscopicandendoscopiccooperativesurgeryforgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumor
AT sanotakeshi excellentoncologicaloutcomesbesidesshorttermsafetyoflaparoscopicandendoscopiccooperativesurgeryforgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumor
AT nunobesouya excellentoncologicaloutcomesbesidesshorttermsafetyoflaparoscopicandendoscopiccooperativesurgeryforgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumor