Cargando…
Excellent oncological outcomes besides short-term safety of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor
Background and study aims Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) for gastric submucosal tumor was developed as a type of minimal local resection and is now widely used in Asian countries. However, the oncological safety of LECS for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) remai...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2022
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9473822/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36118650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1895-9507 |
_version_ | 1784789579230871552 |
---|---|
author | Harada, Hiroki Ohashi, Manabu Hiki, Naoki Fujisaki, Junko Hirasawa, Toshiaki Yamamoto, Yorimasa Makuuchi, Rie Ida, Satoshi Hayami, Masaru Kumagai, Koshi Sano, Takeshi Nunobe, Souya |
author_facet | Harada, Hiroki Ohashi, Manabu Hiki, Naoki Fujisaki, Junko Hirasawa, Toshiaki Yamamoto, Yorimasa Makuuchi, Rie Ida, Satoshi Hayami, Masaru Kumagai, Koshi Sano, Takeshi Nunobe, Souya |
author_sort | Harada, Hiroki |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and study aims Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) for gastric submucosal tumor was developed as a type of minimal local resection and is now widely used in Asian countries. However, the oncological safety of LECS for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) remains unclear. LECS has potential oncology-related problems that may influence survival outcomes. Furthermore, the feasibility and safety of LECS have not yet been fully established. Patients and methods Patients who were intended to undergo LECS for gastric GIST from 2006 to 2020 were retrospectively selected. The indication for LECS was determined according to the guidelines. The completion of LECS, complications, and survival outcomes of the patients were analyzed. Results Two hundred fifty-nine patients were eligible in this study. According to intraoperative findings, 44 patients underwent local resection without luminal endoscopic procedures. Of the remaining 215 patients, 213 completely underwent LECS, which corresponds to a completion rate of 99.1 %. Six patients (2.8 %) had postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo classification grade II or higher. Delayed gastric emptying was most commonly found in four patients (1.9 %). Old age ( P = 0.0349), female sex ( P = 0.0095), tumor located in the lesser curvature ( P = 0.0015), and large tumor diameter ( P = 0.0232) were significantly more common in patients with complications. The 3-year overall and disease-specific survival rates were 99 % and 100 %, respectively, in 215 patients who were intended to undergo LECS. Conclusions Despite several oncological concerns, LECS for gastric GIST is oncologically safe besides a feasible and safe procedure in the short-term. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9473822 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94738222022-09-15 Excellent oncological outcomes besides short-term safety of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor Harada, Hiroki Ohashi, Manabu Hiki, Naoki Fujisaki, Junko Hirasawa, Toshiaki Yamamoto, Yorimasa Makuuchi, Rie Ida, Satoshi Hayami, Masaru Kumagai, Koshi Sano, Takeshi Nunobe, Souya Endosc Int Open Background and study aims Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) for gastric submucosal tumor was developed as a type of minimal local resection and is now widely used in Asian countries. However, the oncological safety of LECS for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) remains unclear. LECS has potential oncology-related problems that may influence survival outcomes. Furthermore, the feasibility and safety of LECS have not yet been fully established. Patients and methods Patients who were intended to undergo LECS for gastric GIST from 2006 to 2020 were retrospectively selected. The indication for LECS was determined according to the guidelines. The completion of LECS, complications, and survival outcomes of the patients were analyzed. Results Two hundred fifty-nine patients were eligible in this study. According to intraoperative findings, 44 patients underwent local resection without luminal endoscopic procedures. Of the remaining 215 patients, 213 completely underwent LECS, which corresponds to a completion rate of 99.1 %. Six patients (2.8 %) had postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo classification grade II or higher. Delayed gastric emptying was most commonly found in four patients (1.9 %). Old age ( P = 0.0349), female sex ( P = 0.0095), tumor located in the lesser curvature ( P = 0.0015), and large tumor diameter ( P = 0.0232) were significantly more common in patients with complications. The 3-year overall and disease-specific survival rates were 99 % and 100 %, respectively, in 215 patients who were intended to undergo LECS. Conclusions Despite several oncological concerns, LECS for gastric GIST is oncologically safe besides a feasible and safe procedure in the short-term. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2022-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9473822/ /pubmed/36118650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1895-9507 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Harada, Hiroki Ohashi, Manabu Hiki, Naoki Fujisaki, Junko Hirasawa, Toshiaki Yamamoto, Yorimasa Makuuchi, Rie Ida, Satoshi Hayami, Masaru Kumagai, Koshi Sano, Takeshi Nunobe, Souya Excellent oncological outcomes besides short-term safety of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor |
title | Excellent oncological outcomes besides short-term safety of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor |
title_full | Excellent oncological outcomes besides short-term safety of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor |
title_fullStr | Excellent oncological outcomes besides short-term safety of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor |
title_full_unstemmed | Excellent oncological outcomes besides short-term safety of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor |
title_short | Excellent oncological outcomes besides short-term safety of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor |
title_sort | excellent oncological outcomes besides short-term safety of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9473822/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36118650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1895-9507 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT haradahiroki excellentoncologicaloutcomesbesidesshorttermsafetyoflaparoscopicandendoscopiccooperativesurgeryforgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumor AT ohashimanabu excellentoncologicaloutcomesbesidesshorttermsafetyoflaparoscopicandendoscopiccooperativesurgeryforgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumor AT hikinaoki excellentoncologicaloutcomesbesidesshorttermsafetyoflaparoscopicandendoscopiccooperativesurgeryforgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumor AT fujisakijunko excellentoncologicaloutcomesbesidesshorttermsafetyoflaparoscopicandendoscopiccooperativesurgeryforgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumor AT hirasawatoshiaki excellentoncologicaloutcomesbesidesshorttermsafetyoflaparoscopicandendoscopiccooperativesurgeryforgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumor AT yamamotoyorimasa excellentoncologicaloutcomesbesidesshorttermsafetyoflaparoscopicandendoscopiccooperativesurgeryforgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumor AT makuuchirie excellentoncologicaloutcomesbesidesshorttermsafetyoflaparoscopicandendoscopiccooperativesurgeryforgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumor AT idasatoshi excellentoncologicaloutcomesbesidesshorttermsafetyoflaparoscopicandendoscopiccooperativesurgeryforgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumor AT hayamimasaru excellentoncologicaloutcomesbesidesshorttermsafetyoflaparoscopicandendoscopiccooperativesurgeryforgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumor AT kumagaikoshi excellentoncologicaloutcomesbesidesshorttermsafetyoflaparoscopicandendoscopiccooperativesurgeryforgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumor AT sanotakeshi excellentoncologicaloutcomesbesidesshorttermsafetyoflaparoscopicandendoscopiccooperativesurgeryforgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumor AT nunobesouya excellentoncologicaloutcomesbesidesshorttermsafetyoflaparoscopicandendoscopiccooperativesurgeryforgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumor |