Cargando…
Histological assessment of new cholangioscopy-guided forceps in ERCP biliary stricture sampling: a blinded comparative study
Background and study aims Obtaining quality tissue during ERCP biliary stricture sampling is of paramount importance for a timely diagnosis. While single-operator cholangioscopy (SOC)-guided biopsies have been suggested to be the superior biliary tissue acquisition modality given direct tissue visu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2022
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9473850/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36118635 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1897-4686 |
_version_ | 1784789586390548480 |
---|---|
author | Vargas, Eric J. Wang, Yaohong Chen, Zongming Eric Abusaleh, Rami Storm, Andrew C. Martin, John A. Law, Ryan J. Dayyeh, Barham K. Abu Levy, Michael J. Petersen, Bret Chandrasekhara, Vinay |
author_facet | Vargas, Eric J. Wang, Yaohong Chen, Zongming Eric Abusaleh, Rami Storm, Andrew C. Martin, John A. Law, Ryan J. Dayyeh, Barham K. Abu Levy, Michael J. Petersen, Bret Chandrasekhara, Vinay |
author_sort | Vargas, Eric J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and study aims Obtaining quality tissue during ERCP biliary stricture sampling is of paramount importance for a timely diagnosis. While single-operator cholangioscopy (SOC)-guided biopsies have been suggested to be the superior biliary tissue acquisition modality given direct tissue visualization, less is known about the specimen histological quality. We aimed to analyze the specimen quality of SOC biopsies and compare the new generation forceps with prior “legacy” forceps. Patients and methods Patients who underwent SOC from January 2017-August 2021 for biliary sampling were reviewed. In February 2020, the SOC-guided biopsy forceps were changed from legacy SpyBite to the SpyBite Max forceps (max). Specimens were assessed by blinded pathologists for crush artifact (none, mild, or severe) and gross size (greatest dimension in mm). Crush artifact and gross size were compared between the two groups. The diagnostic performance characteristics for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), were assessed in an exploratory fashion. Results Eighty-one patients (max = 27, legacy = 54) with similar baseline characteristics were included in this study. On blinded pathological assessment, 58 % had crush artifact, without significant differences between the two groups (Max 63 % vs. Legacy 56 %; P = 0.64). A similar mean specimen size was found (max 3 mm vs. legacy 3.2 mm; P = 0.24). The overall prevalence of CCA was 40 %. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the entire cohort using a combination of cytology, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and SOC-guided biopsies were 78.1 %, 91.8 %, 86.2 %, and 86.5 %, respectively. No difference between legacy or max groups was found. Conclusions A high rate of crush artifact was found in SOC-guided biopsy specimens. Further investigation regarding proper biopsy technique and handling is necessary to increase the diagnostic yield with SOC-guided biopsies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9473850 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94738502022-09-15 Histological assessment of new cholangioscopy-guided forceps in ERCP biliary stricture sampling: a blinded comparative study Vargas, Eric J. Wang, Yaohong Chen, Zongming Eric Abusaleh, Rami Storm, Andrew C. Martin, John A. Law, Ryan J. Dayyeh, Barham K. Abu Levy, Michael J. Petersen, Bret Chandrasekhara, Vinay Endosc Int Open Background and study aims Obtaining quality tissue during ERCP biliary stricture sampling is of paramount importance for a timely diagnosis. While single-operator cholangioscopy (SOC)-guided biopsies have been suggested to be the superior biliary tissue acquisition modality given direct tissue visualization, less is known about the specimen histological quality. We aimed to analyze the specimen quality of SOC biopsies and compare the new generation forceps with prior “legacy” forceps. Patients and methods Patients who underwent SOC from January 2017-August 2021 for biliary sampling were reviewed. In February 2020, the SOC-guided biopsy forceps were changed from legacy SpyBite to the SpyBite Max forceps (max). Specimens were assessed by blinded pathologists for crush artifact (none, mild, or severe) and gross size (greatest dimension in mm). Crush artifact and gross size were compared between the two groups. The diagnostic performance characteristics for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), were assessed in an exploratory fashion. Results Eighty-one patients (max = 27, legacy = 54) with similar baseline characteristics were included in this study. On blinded pathological assessment, 58 % had crush artifact, without significant differences between the two groups (Max 63 % vs. Legacy 56 %; P = 0.64). A similar mean specimen size was found (max 3 mm vs. legacy 3.2 mm; P = 0.24). The overall prevalence of CCA was 40 %. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the entire cohort using a combination of cytology, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and SOC-guided biopsies were 78.1 %, 91.8 %, 86.2 %, and 86.5 %, respectively. No difference between legacy or max groups was found. Conclusions A high rate of crush artifact was found in SOC-guided biopsy specimens. Further investigation regarding proper biopsy technique and handling is necessary to increase the diagnostic yield with SOC-guided biopsies. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2022-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9473850/ /pubmed/36118635 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1897-4686 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Vargas, Eric J. Wang, Yaohong Chen, Zongming Eric Abusaleh, Rami Storm, Andrew C. Martin, John A. Law, Ryan J. Dayyeh, Barham K. Abu Levy, Michael J. Petersen, Bret Chandrasekhara, Vinay Histological assessment of new cholangioscopy-guided forceps in ERCP biliary stricture sampling: a blinded comparative study |
title | Histological assessment of new cholangioscopy-guided forceps in ERCP biliary stricture sampling: a blinded comparative study |
title_full | Histological assessment of new cholangioscopy-guided forceps in ERCP biliary stricture sampling: a blinded comparative study |
title_fullStr | Histological assessment of new cholangioscopy-guided forceps in ERCP biliary stricture sampling: a blinded comparative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Histological assessment of new cholangioscopy-guided forceps in ERCP biliary stricture sampling: a blinded comparative study |
title_short | Histological assessment of new cholangioscopy-guided forceps in ERCP biliary stricture sampling: a blinded comparative study |
title_sort | histological assessment of new cholangioscopy-guided forceps in ercp biliary stricture sampling: a blinded comparative study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9473850/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36118635 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1897-4686 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vargasericj histologicalassessmentofnewcholangioscopyguidedforcepsinercpbiliarystricturesamplingablindedcomparativestudy AT wangyaohong histologicalassessmentofnewcholangioscopyguidedforcepsinercpbiliarystricturesamplingablindedcomparativestudy AT chenzongmingeric histologicalassessmentofnewcholangioscopyguidedforcepsinercpbiliarystricturesamplingablindedcomparativestudy AT abusalehrami histologicalassessmentofnewcholangioscopyguidedforcepsinercpbiliarystricturesamplingablindedcomparativestudy AT stormandrewc histologicalassessmentofnewcholangioscopyguidedforcepsinercpbiliarystricturesamplingablindedcomparativestudy AT martinjohna histologicalassessmentofnewcholangioscopyguidedforcepsinercpbiliarystricturesamplingablindedcomparativestudy AT lawryanj histologicalassessmentofnewcholangioscopyguidedforcepsinercpbiliarystricturesamplingablindedcomparativestudy AT dayyehbarhamkabu histologicalassessmentofnewcholangioscopyguidedforcepsinercpbiliarystricturesamplingablindedcomparativestudy AT levymichaelj histologicalassessmentofnewcholangioscopyguidedforcepsinercpbiliarystricturesamplingablindedcomparativestudy AT petersenbret histologicalassessmentofnewcholangioscopyguidedforcepsinercpbiliarystricturesamplingablindedcomparativestudy AT chandrasekharavinay histologicalassessmentofnewcholangioscopyguidedforcepsinercpbiliarystricturesamplingablindedcomparativestudy |