Authenticity Assessment of (E)-Cinnamic Acid, Vanillin, and Benzoic Acid from Sumatra Benzoin Balsam by Gas Chromatography Combustion/Pyrolysis Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry

Authenticity assessment of (E)-cinnamic acid, vanillin, and benzoic acid from various origins (n = 26) was performed using gas chromatography-isotope ratio mass spectrometry coupled with combustion and pyrolysis mode (GC-C/P-IRMS). For that reason, the above three compounds (1–3) from synthetic, natural, and Sumatra benzoin balsam (laboratory prepared, adulterated, and commercial) were investigated. The δ(13)C(V-PDB) and δ(2)H(V-SMOW) values for compounds 1–3 from synthetic samples (S1–S5) ranging from −26.9 to −31.1‰ and 42 to 83‰, respectively, were clearly different from those of authentic samples (N1–N4, L1–L9) varying from −29.8 to −41.6‰ and −19 to −156‰. In adulteration verification testing, for compounds 1 and 3, both δ(13)C(V-PDB) and δ(2)H(V-SMOW) data of A1 (5.0% added) and A2 (2.5% added) except A3 (0.5% added) fell into the synthetic region, whereas for compound 2, the δ(2)H(V-SMOW) data of adulterated samples (A1–A3) fell into the synthetic region, and even the lowest adulterated sample A3 is no exception. With this conclusion, some commercial Sumatra benzoin balsam samples were identified to be adulterated with synthetic 1 (C1, C3, and C5) and synthetic 2 (C3, C4, and C5) but not with synthetic 3. GC-C/P-IRMS allowed clear-cut differentiation of the synthetic and natural origin of 1, 2, and 3 and definite identification of whether a Sumatra benzoin balsam was adulterated or not.