Cargando…
Diagnostic Efficacy of COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Detection Card in Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2
Introduction The rapid surge of severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) cases globally makes it essential for rapid diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (rtRT-PCR) remains as the gold standard to detect COVI...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
2022
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9473934/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36119413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1744237 |
_version_ | 1784789606032474112 |
---|---|
author | Selvabai R, Alice P. Koshy, Lino V. Shanmugam, Priyadarshini |
author_facet | Selvabai R, Alice P. Koshy, Lino V. Shanmugam, Priyadarshini |
author_sort | Selvabai R, Alice P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction The rapid surge of severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) cases globally makes it essential for rapid diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (rtRT-PCR) remains as the gold standard to detect COVID-19 cases because of its greater sensitivity and specificity. However, because of its prolonged turnaround time and technical expertise, recommendations have been made to employ the use of rapid diagnostic test for rapid diagnosis and to curb the spread of the disease. Methods This prospective study was performed in a tertiary COVID-19 care hospital located amidst the semi-urban settings. Both nasopharyngeal and throat swabs collected from the COVID 19 suspected study participants were subjected to both COVID 19 rtRT-PCR and rapid antigen testing. Results Of the total 599 samples tested by rtRT-PCR, 310 (52%) were positive and 289 (48%) tested negative for SARS-CoV-2. Of the 599 samples tested by rapid antigen test (RAT), 230 (38%) were positive and 369 (62%) were negative. The overall sensitivity and specificity of our study kit was found to be 74.19 and 100%, respectively. The sensitivity of the RAT greatly overlaps with the viral load which is determined by the cycle threshold (CT) values of SARS-CoV-2, E gene, and RdRp gene. Conclusion RAT yields rapid results within a short-turnaround time and found to be cost effective. Therefore, this test can be adopted in areas with rapid surge in SARS-CoV-2 cases which can help to rapidly identify the positive cases and to implement isolation and infection control measures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9473934 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94739342022-09-15 Diagnostic Efficacy of COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Detection Card in Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 Selvabai R, Alice P. Koshy, Lino V. Shanmugam, Priyadarshini J Lab Physicians Introduction The rapid surge of severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) cases globally makes it essential for rapid diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (rtRT-PCR) remains as the gold standard to detect COVID-19 cases because of its greater sensitivity and specificity. However, because of its prolonged turnaround time and technical expertise, recommendations have been made to employ the use of rapid diagnostic test for rapid diagnosis and to curb the spread of the disease. Methods This prospective study was performed in a tertiary COVID-19 care hospital located amidst the semi-urban settings. Both nasopharyngeal and throat swabs collected from the COVID 19 suspected study participants were subjected to both COVID 19 rtRT-PCR and rapid antigen testing. Results Of the total 599 samples tested by rtRT-PCR, 310 (52%) were positive and 289 (48%) tested negative for SARS-CoV-2. Of the 599 samples tested by rapid antigen test (RAT), 230 (38%) were positive and 369 (62%) were negative. The overall sensitivity and specificity of our study kit was found to be 74.19 and 100%, respectively. The sensitivity of the RAT greatly overlaps with the viral load which is determined by the cycle threshold (CT) values of SARS-CoV-2, E gene, and RdRp gene. Conclusion RAT yields rapid results within a short-turnaround time and found to be cost effective. Therefore, this test can be adopted in areas with rapid surge in SARS-CoV-2 cases which can help to rapidly identify the positive cases and to implement isolation and infection control measures. Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. 2022-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9473934/ /pubmed/36119413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1744237 Text en The Indian Association of Laboratory Physicians. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Selvabai R, Alice P. Koshy, Lino V. Shanmugam, Priyadarshini Diagnostic Efficacy of COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Detection Card in Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 |
title | Diagnostic Efficacy of COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Detection Card in Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 |
title_full | Diagnostic Efficacy of COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Detection Card in Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic Efficacy of COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Detection Card in Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic Efficacy of COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Detection Card in Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 |
title_short | Diagnostic Efficacy of COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Detection Card in Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 |
title_sort | diagnostic efficacy of covid-19 rapid antigen detection card in diagnosis of sars-cov-2 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9473934/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36119413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1744237 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT selvabairalicep diagnosticefficacyofcovid19rapidantigendetectioncardindiagnosisofsarscov2 AT koshylinov diagnosticefficacyofcovid19rapidantigendetectioncardindiagnosisofsarscov2 AT shanmugampriyadarshini diagnosticefficacyofcovid19rapidantigendetectioncardindiagnosisofsarscov2 |