Cargando…

Effect of voxel size in cone-beam computed tomography on surface area measurements of dehiscences and fenestrations in the lower anterior buccal region

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to assess whether different voxel sizes in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) affected surface area measurements of dehiscences and fenestrations in the mandibular anterior buccal region. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nineteen dry human mandibles were scanned with a surface sc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Leeuwen, B. J., Dijkstra, P. U., Dieters, J. A., Verbeek, H. P. J., Kuijpers-Jagtman, A. M., Ren, Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9474376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35513582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04521-x
_version_ 1784789703351861248
author van Leeuwen, B. J.
Dijkstra, P. U.
Dieters, J. A.
Verbeek, H. P. J.
Kuijpers-Jagtman, A. M.
Ren, Y.
author_facet van Leeuwen, B. J.
Dijkstra, P. U.
Dieters, J. A.
Verbeek, H. P. J.
Kuijpers-Jagtman, A. M.
Ren, Y.
author_sort van Leeuwen, B. J.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study aims to assess whether different voxel sizes in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) affected surface area measurements of dehiscences and fenestrations in the mandibular anterior buccal region. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nineteen dry human mandibles were scanned with a surface scanner (SS). Wax was attached to the mandibles as a soft tissue equivalent. Three-dimensional digital models were generated with a CBCT unit, with voxel sizes of 0.200 mm (VS200), 0.400 mm (VS400), and 0.600 mm (VS600). The buccal surface areas of the six anterior teeth were measured (in mm(2)) to evaluate areas of dehiscences and fenestrations. Differences between the CBCT and SS measurements were determined in a linear mixed model analysis. RESULTS: The mean surface area per tooth was 88.3 ± 24.0 mm(2), with the SS, and 94.6 ± 26.5 (VS200), 95.1 ± 27.3 (VS400), and 96.0 ± 26.5 (VS600), with CBCT scans. Larger surface areas resulted in larger differences between CBCT and SS measurements (− 0.1 β, SE = 0.02, p < 0.001). Deviations from SS measurements were larger with VS600, compared to VS200 (1.3 β, SE = 0.05, P = 0.009). Fenestrations were undetectable with CBCT. CONCLUSIONS: CBCT imaging magnified the surface area of dehiscences in the anterior buccal region of the mandible by 7 to 9%. The larger the voxel size, the larger the deviation from SS measurements. Fenestrations were not detectable with CBCT. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: CBCT is an acceptable tool for measuring dehiscences but not fenestrations. However, CBCT overestimates the size of dehiscences, and the degree of overestimation depends on the actual dehiscence size and CBCT voxel size employed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9474376
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94743762022-09-16 Effect of voxel size in cone-beam computed tomography on surface area measurements of dehiscences and fenestrations in the lower anterior buccal region van Leeuwen, B. J. Dijkstra, P. U. Dieters, J. A. Verbeek, H. P. J. Kuijpers-Jagtman, A. M. Ren, Y. Clin Oral Investig Original Article OBJECTIVES: This study aims to assess whether different voxel sizes in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) affected surface area measurements of dehiscences and fenestrations in the mandibular anterior buccal region. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nineteen dry human mandibles were scanned with a surface scanner (SS). Wax was attached to the mandibles as a soft tissue equivalent. Three-dimensional digital models were generated with a CBCT unit, with voxel sizes of 0.200 mm (VS200), 0.400 mm (VS400), and 0.600 mm (VS600). The buccal surface areas of the six anterior teeth were measured (in mm(2)) to evaluate areas of dehiscences and fenestrations. Differences between the CBCT and SS measurements were determined in a linear mixed model analysis. RESULTS: The mean surface area per tooth was 88.3 ± 24.0 mm(2), with the SS, and 94.6 ± 26.5 (VS200), 95.1 ± 27.3 (VS400), and 96.0 ± 26.5 (VS600), with CBCT scans. Larger surface areas resulted in larger differences between CBCT and SS measurements (− 0.1 β, SE = 0.02, p < 0.001). Deviations from SS measurements were larger with VS600, compared to VS200 (1.3 β, SE = 0.05, P = 0.009). Fenestrations were undetectable with CBCT. CONCLUSIONS: CBCT imaging magnified the surface area of dehiscences in the anterior buccal region of the mandible by 7 to 9%. The larger the voxel size, the larger the deviation from SS measurements. Fenestrations were not detectable with CBCT. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: CBCT is an acceptable tool for measuring dehiscences but not fenestrations. However, CBCT overestimates the size of dehiscences, and the degree of overestimation depends on the actual dehiscence size and CBCT voxel size employed. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-05-05 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9474376/ /pubmed/35513582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04521-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
van Leeuwen, B. J.
Dijkstra, P. U.
Dieters, J. A.
Verbeek, H. P. J.
Kuijpers-Jagtman, A. M.
Ren, Y.
Effect of voxel size in cone-beam computed tomography on surface area measurements of dehiscences and fenestrations in the lower anterior buccal region
title Effect of voxel size in cone-beam computed tomography on surface area measurements of dehiscences and fenestrations in the lower anterior buccal region
title_full Effect of voxel size in cone-beam computed tomography on surface area measurements of dehiscences and fenestrations in the lower anterior buccal region
title_fullStr Effect of voxel size in cone-beam computed tomography on surface area measurements of dehiscences and fenestrations in the lower anterior buccal region
title_full_unstemmed Effect of voxel size in cone-beam computed tomography on surface area measurements of dehiscences and fenestrations in the lower anterior buccal region
title_short Effect of voxel size in cone-beam computed tomography on surface area measurements of dehiscences and fenestrations in the lower anterior buccal region
title_sort effect of voxel size in cone-beam computed tomography on surface area measurements of dehiscences and fenestrations in the lower anterior buccal region
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9474376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35513582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04521-x
work_keys_str_mv AT vanleeuwenbj effectofvoxelsizeinconebeamcomputedtomographyonsurfaceareameasurementsofdehiscencesandfenestrationsintheloweranteriorbuccalregion
AT dijkstrapu effectofvoxelsizeinconebeamcomputedtomographyonsurfaceareameasurementsofdehiscencesandfenestrationsintheloweranteriorbuccalregion
AT dietersja effectofvoxelsizeinconebeamcomputedtomographyonsurfaceareameasurementsofdehiscencesandfenestrationsintheloweranteriorbuccalregion
AT verbeekhpj effectofvoxelsizeinconebeamcomputedtomographyonsurfaceareameasurementsofdehiscencesandfenestrationsintheloweranteriorbuccalregion
AT kuijpersjagtmanam effectofvoxelsizeinconebeamcomputedtomographyonsurfaceareameasurementsofdehiscencesandfenestrationsintheloweranteriorbuccalregion
AT reny effectofvoxelsizeinconebeamcomputedtomographyonsurfaceareameasurementsofdehiscencesandfenestrationsintheloweranteriorbuccalregion