Cargando…

Endoscopic surveillance alone is feasible and safe in type I gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms less than 10 mm in diameter

PURPOSE: Type I gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (g-NENs) have a low risk of metastasis and a generally favourable prognosis. Patients with small type I g-NENs (≤10 mm) frequently require no treatment, whereas those with larger polyps usually undergo resection. We evaluated the safety and outcomes o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Exarchou, Klaire, Hu, Haiyi, Stephens, Nathan A., Moore, Andrew R., Kelly, Mark, Lamarca, Angela, Mansoor, Wasat, Hubner, Richard, McNamara, Mairéad G., Smart, Howard, Howes, Nathan R., Valle, Juan W., Pritchard, D. Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9474380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35895180
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12020-022-03143-3
_version_ 1784789704295579648
author Exarchou, Klaire
Hu, Haiyi
Stephens, Nathan A.
Moore, Andrew R.
Kelly, Mark
Lamarca, Angela
Mansoor, Wasat
Hubner, Richard
McNamara, Mairéad G.
Smart, Howard
Howes, Nathan R.
Valle, Juan W.
Pritchard, D. Mark
author_facet Exarchou, Klaire
Hu, Haiyi
Stephens, Nathan A.
Moore, Andrew R.
Kelly, Mark
Lamarca, Angela
Mansoor, Wasat
Hubner, Richard
McNamara, Mairéad G.
Smart, Howard
Howes, Nathan R.
Valle, Juan W.
Pritchard, D. Mark
author_sort Exarchou, Klaire
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Type I gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (g-NENs) have a low risk of metastasis and a generally favourable prognosis. Patients with small type I g-NENs (≤10 mm) frequently require no treatment, whereas those with larger polyps usually undergo resection. We evaluated the safety and outcomes of endoscopic surveillance after no initial treatment in selected patients with type I g-NENs. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of type I g-NEN patients across two European Neuroendocrine Tumour Society Centers of Excellence 2003–2019. RESULTS: Following initial assessment, 87 of 115 patients with type I g-NEN (75 with polyps ≤10 mm) received no initial treatment and underwent endoscopic surveillance. 79/87 (91%) demonstrated no clinically meaningful change in tumour size or grade over a median 62 month follow up. Only two patients developed NEN progression that required a change in management and two other patients developed gastric adenocarcinoma/high grade dysplasia; all four initially had ≥11 mm g-NENs. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ≤10 mm type I g-NENs were unlikely to develop clinically significant tumour progression and in most cases, resection was not needed. The endoscopic surveillance interval could therefore potentially be safely increased to every 2–3 years in such patients. However, lifelong surveillance is still advocated due to the additional risk of developing gastric adenocarcinoma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9474380
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94743802022-09-16 Endoscopic surveillance alone is feasible and safe in type I gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms less than 10 mm in diameter Exarchou, Klaire Hu, Haiyi Stephens, Nathan A. Moore, Andrew R. Kelly, Mark Lamarca, Angela Mansoor, Wasat Hubner, Richard McNamara, Mairéad G. Smart, Howard Howes, Nathan R. Valle, Juan W. Pritchard, D. Mark Endocrine Original Article PURPOSE: Type I gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (g-NENs) have a low risk of metastasis and a generally favourable prognosis. Patients with small type I g-NENs (≤10 mm) frequently require no treatment, whereas those with larger polyps usually undergo resection. We evaluated the safety and outcomes of endoscopic surveillance after no initial treatment in selected patients with type I g-NENs. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of type I g-NEN patients across two European Neuroendocrine Tumour Society Centers of Excellence 2003–2019. RESULTS: Following initial assessment, 87 of 115 patients with type I g-NEN (75 with polyps ≤10 mm) received no initial treatment and underwent endoscopic surveillance. 79/87 (91%) demonstrated no clinically meaningful change in tumour size or grade over a median 62 month follow up. Only two patients developed NEN progression that required a change in management and two other patients developed gastric adenocarcinoma/high grade dysplasia; all four initially had ≥11 mm g-NENs. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ≤10 mm type I g-NENs were unlikely to develop clinically significant tumour progression and in most cases, resection was not needed. The endoscopic surveillance interval could therefore potentially be safely increased to every 2–3 years in such patients. However, lifelong surveillance is still advocated due to the additional risk of developing gastric adenocarcinoma. Springer US 2022-07-27 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9474380/ /pubmed/35895180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12020-022-03143-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Exarchou, Klaire
Hu, Haiyi
Stephens, Nathan A.
Moore, Andrew R.
Kelly, Mark
Lamarca, Angela
Mansoor, Wasat
Hubner, Richard
McNamara, Mairéad G.
Smart, Howard
Howes, Nathan R.
Valle, Juan W.
Pritchard, D. Mark
Endoscopic surveillance alone is feasible and safe in type I gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms less than 10 mm in diameter
title Endoscopic surveillance alone is feasible and safe in type I gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms less than 10 mm in diameter
title_full Endoscopic surveillance alone is feasible and safe in type I gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms less than 10 mm in diameter
title_fullStr Endoscopic surveillance alone is feasible and safe in type I gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms less than 10 mm in diameter
title_full_unstemmed Endoscopic surveillance alone is feasible and safe in type I gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms less than 10 mm in diameter
title_short Endoscopic surveillance alone is feasible and safe in type I gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms less than 10 mm in diameter
title_sort endoscopic surveillance alone is feasible and safe in type i gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms less than 10 mm in diameter
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9474380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35895180
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12020-022-03143-3
work_keys_str_mv AT exarchouklaire endoscopicsurveillancealoneisfeasibleandsafeintypeigastricneuroendocrineneoplasmslessthan10mmindiameter
AT huhaiyi endoscopicsurveillancealoneisfeasibleandsafeintypeigastricneuroendocrineneoplasmslessthan10mmindiameter
AT stephensnathana endoscopicsurveillancealoneisfeasibleandsafeintypeigastricneuroendocrineneoplasmslessthan10mmindiameter
AT mooreandrewr endoscopicsurveillancealoneisfeasibleandsafeintypeigastricneuroendocrineneoplasmslessthan10mmindiameter
AT kellymark endoscopicsurveillancealoneisfeasibleandsafeintypeigastricneuroendocrineneoplasmslessthan10mmindiameter
AT lamarcaangela endoscopicsurveillancealoneisfeasibleandsafeintypeigastricneuroendocrineneoplasmslessthan10mmindiameter
AT mansoorwasat endoscopicsurveillancealoneisfeasibleandsafeintypeigastricneuroendocrineneoplasmslessthan10mmindiameter
AT hubnerrichard endoscopicsurveillancealoneisfeasibleandsafeintypeigastricneuroendocrineneoplasmslessthan10mmindiameter
AT mcnamaramaireadg endoscopicsurveillancealoneisfeasibleandsafeintypeigastricneuroendocrineneoplasmslessthan10mmindiameter
AT smarthoward endoscopicsurveillancealoneisfeasibleandsafeintypeigastricneuroendocrineneoplasmslessthan10mmindiameter
AT howesnathanr endoscopicsurveillancealoneisfeasibleandsafeintypeigastricneuroendocrineneoplasmslessthan10mmindiameter
AT vallejuanw endoscopicsurveillancealoneisfeasibleandsafeintypeigastricneuroendocrineneoplasmslessthan10mmindiameter
AT pritcharddmark endoscopicsurveillancealoneisfeasibleandsafeintypeigastricneuroendocrineneoplasmslessthan10mmindiameter