Cargando…

The impact of a structured weight-loss treatment on physical fitness in patients with psoriatic arthritis and obesity compared to matched controls: a prospective interventional study

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of weight loss treatment on physical fitness in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and obesity compared to matched controls. METHODS: In total, 46 patients with PsA (CASPAR) and BMI ≥ 33 kg/m(2) and 52 obese persons were included in this 12-month prospective...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bilberg, Annelie, Larsson, Ingrid, Björkman, Sofia, Eliasson, Björn, Klingberg, Eva
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9474576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35648298
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10067-022-06164-5
_version_ 1784789749310947328
author Bilberg, Annelie
Larsson, Ingrid
Björkman, Sofia
Eliasson, Björn
Klingberg, Eva
author_facet Bilberg, Annelie
Larsson, Ingrid
Björkman, Sofia
Eliasson, Björn
Klingberg, Eva
author_sort Bilberg, Annelie
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of weight loss treatment on physical fitness in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and obesity compared to matched controls. METHODS: In total, 46 patients with PsA (CASPAR) and BMI ≥ 33 kg/m(2) and 52 obese persons were included in this 12-month prospective open intervention study with a very low energy diet (640 kcal/day), followed by structured reintroduction of an energy-restricted diet and brief support for physical activity. The primary outcome was muscle strength assessed with hand-grip strength (Grippit) and leg muscle strength (timed stand test). Secondary outcomes were cardiorespiratory fitness, body composition, and physical functioning (SF-36PCS). Outcomes were assessed at baseline, 6 (M6), and 12 months (M12). Nonparametric statistics were used. RESULTS: Median weight reduction at M6 was 18.9 kg in patients and 23.0 kg in controls, (p = 0.546). At M12, patients’ median weight loss from baseline was 16.1 kg, corresponding with significant loss of total fat mass (− 30.1%), and lean mass (total − 7.0%, arm − 13.7%, and leg − 6.0%). Leg muscle strength improved in patients and controls at M6 (p < 0.001) and remained improved at M12 (p < 0.01), while hand-grip strength was unchanged in both groups. Cardiorespiratory fitness increased in controls at M6 (p = 0.018) and M12 (p = 0.028) but not in patients. Physical functioning improved in both groups at M6 (p < 0.001) and remained improved at M12 (p = 0.008) and (p < 0.01), respectively. CONCLUSION: The intervention resulted in positive effects on body weight and total body fat. Despite reduced lean body mass, the muscle strength did not deteriorate in patients with PsA and controls. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02917434, registered on September 21, 2016-retrospectively registered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9474576
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94745762022-09-16 The impact of a structured weight-loss treatment on physical fitness in patients with psoriatic arthritis and obesity compared to matched controls: a prospective interventional study Bilberg, Annelie Larsson, Ingrid Björkman, Sofia Eliasson, Björn Klingberg, Eva Clin Rheumatol Original Article OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of weight loss treatment on physical fitness in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and obesity compared to matched controls. METHODS: In total, 46 patients with PsA (CASPAR) and BMI ≥ 33 kg/m(2) and 52 obese persons were included in this 12-month prospective open intervention study with a very low energy diet (640 kcal/day), followed by structured reintroduction of an energy-restricted diet and brief support for physical activity. The primary outcome was muscle strength assessed with hand-grip strength (Grippit) and leg muscle strength (timed stand test). Secondary outcomes were cardiorespiratory fitness, body composition, and physical functioning (SF-36PCS). Outcomes were assessed at baseline, 6 (M6), and 12 months (M12). Nonparametric statistics were used. RESULTS: Median weight reduction at M6 was 18.9 kg in patients and 23.0 kg in controls, (p = 0.546). At M12, patients’ median weight loss from baseline was 16.1 kg, corresponding with significant loss of total fat mass (− 30.1%), and lean mass (total − 7.0%, arm − 13.7%, and leg − 6.0%). Leg muscle strength improved in patients and controls at M6 (p < 0.001) and remained improved at M12 (p < 0.01), while hand-grip strength was unchanged in both groups. Cardiorespiratory fitness increased in controls at M6 (p = 0.018) and M12 (p = 0.028) but not in patients. Physical functioning improved in both groups at M6 (p < 0.001) and remained improved at M12 (p = 0.008) and (p < 0.01), respectively. CONCLUSION: The intervention resulted in positive effects on body weight and total body fat. Despite reduced lean body mass, the muscle strength did not deteriorate in patients with PsA and controls. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02917434, registered on September 21, 2016-retrospectively registered. Springer International Publishing 2022-06-01 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9474576/ /pubmed/35648298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10067-022-06164-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Bilberg, Annelie
Larsson, Ingrid
Björkman, Sofia
Eliasson, Björn
Klingberg, Eva
The impact of a structured weight-loss treatment on physical fitness in patients with psoriatic arthritis and obesity compared to matched controls: a prospective interventional study
title The impact of a structured weight-loss treatment on physical fitness in patients with psoriatic arthritis and obesity compared to matched controls: a prospective interventional study
title_full The impact of a structured weight-loss treatment on physical fitness in patients with psoriatic arthritis and obesity compared to matched controls: a prospective interventional study
title_fullStr The impact of a structured weight-loss treatment on physical fitness in patients with psoriatic arthritis and obesity compared to matched controls: a prospective interventional study
title_full_unstemmed The impact of a structured weight-loss treatment on physical fitness in patients with psoriatic arthritis and obesity compared to matched controls: a prospective interventional study
title_short The impact of a structured weight-loss treatment on physical fitness in patients with psoriatic arthritis and obesity compared to matched controls: a prospective interventional study
title_sort impact of a structured weight-loss treatment on physical fitness in patients with psoriatic arthritis and obesity compared to matched controls: a prospective interventional study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9474576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35648298
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10067-022-06164-5
work_keys_str_mv AT bilbergannelie theimpactofastructuredweightlosstreatmentonphysicalfitnessinpatientswithpsoriaticarthritisandobesitycomparedtomatchedcontrolsaprospectiveinterventionalstudy
AT larssoningrid theimpactofastructuredweightlosstreatmentonphysicalfitnessinpatientswithpsoriaticarthritisandobesitycomparedtomatchedcontrolsaprospectiveinterventionalstudy
AT bjorkmansofia theimpactofastructuredweightlosstreatmentonphysicalfitnessinpatientswithpsoriaticarthritisandobesitycomparedtomatchedcontrolsaprospectiveinterventionalstudy
AT eliassonbjorn theimpactofastructuredweightlosstreatmentonphysicalfitnessinpatientswithpsoriaticarthritisandobesitycomparedtomatchedcontrolsaprospectiveinterventionalstudy
AT klingbergeva theimpactofastructuredweightlosstreatmentonphysicalfitnessinpatientswithpsoriaticarthritisandobesitycomparedtomatchedcontrolsaprospectiveinterventionalstudy
AT bilbergannelie impactofastructuredweightlosstreatmentonphysicalfitnessinpatientswithpsoriaticarthritisandobesitycomparedtomatchedcontrolsaprospectiveinterventionalstudy
AT larssoningrid impactofastructuredweightlosstreatmentonphysicalfitnessinpatientswithpsoriaticarthritisandobesitycomparedtomatchedcontrolsaprospectiveinterventionalstudy
AT bjorkmansofia impactofastructuredweightlosstreatmentonphysicalfitnessinpatientswithpsoriaticarthritisandobesitycomparedtomatchedcontrolsaprospectiveinterventionalstudy
AT eliassonbjorn impactofastructuredweightlosstreatmentonphysicalfitnessinpatientswithpsoriaticarthritisandobesitycomparedtomatchedcontrolsaprospectiveinterventionalstudy
AT klingbergeva impactofastructuredweightlosstreatmentonphysicalfitnessinpatientswithpsoriaticarthritisandobesitycomparedtomatchedcontrolsaprospectiveinterventionalstudy