Cargando…
The impact of a structured weight-loss treatment on physical fitness in patients with psoriatic arthritis and obesity compared to matched controls: a prospective interventional study
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of weight loss treatment on physical fitness in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and obesity compared to matched controls. METHODS: In total, 46 patients with PsA (CASPAR) and BMI ≥ 33 kg/m(2) and 52 obese persons were included in this 12-month prospective...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9474576/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35648298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10067-022-06164-5 |
_version_ | 1784789749310947328 |
---|---|
author | Bilberg, Annelie Larsson, Ingrid Björkman, Sofia Eliasson, Björn Klingberg, Eva |
author_facet | Bilberg, Annelie Larsson, Ingrid Björkman, Sofia Eliasson, Björn Klingberg, Eva |
author_sort | Bilberg, Annelie |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of weight loss treatment on physical fitness in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and obesity compared to matched controls. METHODS: In total, 46 patients with PsA (CASPAR) and BMI ≥ 33 kg/m(2) and 52 obese persons were included in this 12-month prospective open intervention study with a very low energy diet (640 kcal/day), followed by structured reintroduction of an energy-restricted diet and brief support for physical activity. The primary outcome was muscle strength assessed with hand-grip strength (Grippit) and leg muscle strength (timed stand test). Secondary outcomes were cardiorespiratory fitness, body composition, and physical functioning (SF-36PCS). Outcomes were assessed at baseline, 6 (M6), and 12 months (M12). Nonparametric statistics were used. RESULTS: Median weight reduction at M6 was 18.9 kg in patients and 23.0 kg in controls, (p = 0.546). At M12, patients’ median weight loss from baseline was 16.1 kg, corresponding with significant loss of total fat mass (− 30.1%), and lean mass (total − 7.0%, arm − 13.7%, and leg − 6.0%). Leg muscle strength improved in patients and controls at M6 (p < 0.001) and remained improved at M12 (p < 0.01), while hand-grip strength was unchanged in both groups. Cardiorespiratory fitness increased in controls at M6 (p = 0.018) and M12 (p = 0.028) but not in patients. Physical functioning improved in both groups at M6 (p < 0.001) and remained improved at M12 (p = 0.008) and (p < 0.01), respectively. CONCLUSION: The intervention resulted in positive effects on body weight and total body fat. Despite reduced lean body mass, the muscle strength did not deteriorate in patients with PsA and controls. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02917434, registered on September 21, 2016-retrospectively registered. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9474576 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94745762022-09-16 The impact of a structured weight-loss treatment on physical fitness in patients with psoriatic arthritis and obesity compared to matched controls: a prospective interventional study Bilberg, Annelie Larsson, Ingrid Björkman, Sofia Eliasson, Björn Klingberg, Eva Clin Rheumatol Original Article OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of weight loss treatment on physical fitness in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and obesity compared to matched controls. METHODS: In total, 46 patients with PsA (CASPAR) and BMI ≥ 33 kg/m(2) and 52 obese persons were included in this 12-month prospective open intervention study with a very low energy diet (640 kcal/day), followed by structured reintroduction of an energy-restricted diet and brief support for physical activity. The primary outcome was muscle strength assessed with hand-grip strength (Grippit) and leg muscle strength (timed stand test). Secondary outcomes were cardiorespiratory fitness, body composition, and physical functioning (SF-36PCS). Outcomes were assessed at baseline, 6 (M6), and 12 months (M12). Nonparametric statistics were used. RESULTS: Median weight reduction at M6 was 18.9 kg in patients and 23.0 kg in controls, (p = 0.546). At M12, patients’ median weight loss from baseline was 16.1 kg, corresponding with significant loss of total fat mass (− 30.1%), and lean mass (total − 7.0%, arm − 13.7%, and leg − 6.0%). Leg muscle strength improved in patients and controls at M6 (p < 0.001) and remained improved at M12 (p < 0.01), while hand-grip strength was unchanged in both groups. Cardiorespiratory fitness increased in controls at M6 (p = 0.018) and M12 (p = 0.028) but not in patients. Physical functioning improved in both groups at M6 (p < 0.001) and remained improved at M12 (p = 0.008) and (p < 0.01), respectively. CONCLUSION: The intervention resulted in positive effects on body weight and total body fat. Despite reduced lean body mass, the muscle strength did not deteriorate in patients with PsA and controls. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02917434, registered on September 21, 2016-retrospectively registered. Springer International Publishing 2022-06-01 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9474576/ /pubmed/35648298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10067-022-06164-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Bilberg, Annelie Larsson, Ingrid Björkman, Sofia Eliasson, Björn Klingberg, Eva The impact of a structured weight-loss treatment on physical fitness in patients with psoriatic arthritis and obesity compared to matched controls: a prospective interventional study |
title | The impact of a structured weight-loss treatment on physical fitness in patients with psoriatic arthritis and obesity compared to matched controls: a prospective interventional study |
title_full | The impact of a structured weight-loss treatment on physical fitness in patients with psoriatic arthritis and obesity compared to matched controls: a prospective interventional study |
title_fullStr | The impact of a structured weight-loss treatment on physical fitness in patients with psoriatic arthritis and obesity compared to matched controls: a prospective interventional study |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of a structured weight-loss treatment on physical fitness in patients with psoriatic arthritis and obesity compared to matched controls: a prospective interventional study |
title_short | The impact of a structured weight-loss treatment on physical fitness in patients with psoriatic arthritis and obesity compared to matched controls: a prospective interventional study |
title_sort | impact of a structured weight-loss treatment on physical fitness in patients with psoriatic arthritis and obesity compared to matched controls: a prospective interventional study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9474576/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35648298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10067-022-06164-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bilbergannelie theimpactofastructuredweightlosstreatmentonphysicalfitnessinpatientswithpsoriaticarthritisandobesitycomparedtomatchedcontrolsaprospectiveinterventionalstudy AT larssoningrid theimpactofastructuredweightlosstreatmentonphysicalfitnessinpatientswithpsoriaticarthritisandobesitycomparedtomatchedcontrolsaprospectiveinterventionalstudy AT bjorkmansofia theimpactofastructuredweightlosstreatmentonphysicalfitnessinpatientswithpsoriaticarthritisandobesitycomparedtomatchedcontrolsaprospectiveinterventionalstudy AT eliassonbjorn theimpactofastructuredweightlosstreatmentonphysicalfitnessinpatientswithpsoriaticarthritisandobesitycomparedtomatchedcontrolsaprospectiveinterventionalstudy AT klingbergeva theimpactofastructuredweightlosstreatmentonphysicalfitnessinpatientswithpsoriaticarthritisandobesitycomparedtomatchedcontrolsaprospectiveinterventionalstudy AT bilbergannelie impactofastructuredweightlosstreatmentonphysicalfitnessinpatientswithpsoriaticarthritisandobesitycomparedtomatchedcontrolsaprospectiveinterventionalstudy AT larssoningrid impactofastructuredweightlosstreatmentonphysicalfitnessinpatientswithpsoriaticarthritisandobesitycomparedtomatchedcontrolsaprospectiveinterventionalstudy AT bjorkmansofia impactofastructuredweightlosstreatmentonphysicalfitnessinpatientswithpsoriaticarthritisandobesitycomparedtomatchedcontrolsaprospectiveinterventionalstudy AT eliassonbjorn impactofastructuredweightlosstreatmentonphysicalfitnessinpatientswithpsoriaticarthritisandobesitycomparedtomatchedcontrolsaprospectiveinterventionalstudy AT klingbergeva impactofastructuredweightlosstreatmentonphysicalfitnessinpatientswithpsoriaticarthritisandobesitycomparedtomatchedcontrolsaprospectiveinterventionalstudy |