Cargando…
Inferring FDG-PET-positivity of lymph node metastases in proven lung cancer from contrast-enhanced CT using radiomics and machine learning
BACKGROUND: We evaluated the role of radiomics applied to contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) in the detection of lymph node (LN) metastases in patients with known lung cancer compared to (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET)/CT as a reference. METHODS: This retrospectiv...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Vienna
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9474782/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36104467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-022-00296-8 |
_version_ | 1784789765215748096 |
---|---|
author | Gorodetski, Boris Becker, Philipp Hendrik Baur, Alexander Daniel Jacques Hartenstein, Alexander Rogasch, Julian Manuel Michael Furth, Christian Amthauer, Holger Hamm, Bernd Makowski, Marcus Penzkofer, Tobias |
author_facet | Gorodetski, Boris Becker, Philipp Hendrik Baur, Alexander Daniel Jacques Hartenstein, Alexander Rogasch, Julian Manuel Michael Furth, Christian Amthauer, Holger Hamm, Bernd Makowski, Marcus Penzkofer, Tobias |
author_sort | Gorodetski, Boris |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We evaluated the role of radiomics applied to contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) in the detection of lymph node (LN) metastases in patients with known lung cancer compared to (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET)/CT as a reference. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included 381 patients with 1,799 lymph nodes (450 malignant, 1,349 negative). The data set was divided into a training and validation set. A radiomics analysis with 4 filters and 6 algorithms resulting in 24 different radiomics signatures and a bootstrap algorithm (Bagging) with 30 bootstrap iterations was performed. A decision curve analysis was applied to generate a net benefit to compare the radiomics signature to two expert radiologists as one-by-one and as a prescreening tool in combination with the respective radiologist and only the radiologists. RESULTS: All 24 modeling methods showed good and reliable discrimination for malignant/benign LNs (area under the curve 0.75−0.87). The decision curve analysis showed a net benefit for the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) classifier for the entire probability range and outperformed the expert radiologists except for the high probability range. Using the radiomics signature as a prescreening tool for the radiologists did not improve net benefit. CONCLUSIONS: Radiomics showed good discrimination power irrespective of the modeling technique in detecting LN metastases in patients with known lung cancer. The LASSO classifier was a suitable diagnostic tool and even outperformed the expert radiologists, except for high probabilities. Radiomics failed to improve clinical benefit as a prescreening tool. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41747-022-00296-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9474782 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Vienna |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94747822022-09-16 Inferring FDG-PET-positivity of lymph node metastases in proven lung cancer from contrast-enhanced CT using radiomics and machine learning Gorodetski, Boris Becker, Philipp Hendrik Baur, Alexander Daniel Jacques Hartenstein, Alexander Rogasch, Julian Manuel Michael Furth, Christian Amthauer, Holger Hamm, Bernd Makowski, Marcus Penzkofer, Tobias Eur Radiol Exp Original Article BACKGROUND: We evaluated the role of radiomics applied to contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) in the detection of lymph node (LN) metastases in patients with known lung cancer compared to (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET)/CT as a reference. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included 381 patients with 1,799 lymph nodes (450 malignant, 1,349 negative). The data set was divided into a training and validation set. A radiomics analysis with 4 filters and 6 algorithms resulting in 24 different radiomics signatures and a bootstrap algorithm (Bagging) with 30 bootstrap iterations was performed. A decision curve analysis was applied to generate a net benefit to compare the radiomics signature to two expert radiologists as one-by-one and as a prescreening tool in combination with the respective radiologist and only the radiologists. RESULTS: All 24 modeling methods showed good and reliable discrimination for malignant/benign LNs (area under the curve 0.75−0.87). The decision curve analysis showed a net benefit for the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) classifier for the entire probability range and outperformed the expert radiologists except for the high probability range. Using the radiomics signature as a prescreening tool for the radiologists did not improve net benefit. CONCLUSIONS: Radiomics showed good discrimination power irrespective of the modeling technique in detecting LN metastases in patients with known lung cancer. The LASSO classifier was a suitable diagnostic tool and even outperformed the expert radiologists, except for high probabilities. Radiomics failed to improve clinical benefit as a prescreening tool. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41747-022-00296-8. Springer Vienna 2022-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9474782/ /pubmed/36104467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-022-00296-8 Text en © The Author(s) under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Gorodetski, Boris Becker, Philipp Hendrik Baur, Alexander Daniel Jacques Hartenstein, Alexander Rogasch, Julian Manuel Michael Furth, Christian Amthauer, Holger Hamm, Bernd Makowski, Marcus Penzkofer, Tobias Inferring FDG-PET-positivity of lymph node metastases in proven lung cancer from contrast-enhanced CT using radiomics and machine learning |
title | Inferring FDG-PET-positivity of lymph node metastases in proven lung cancer from contrast-enhanced CT using radiomics and machine learning |
title_full | Inferring FDG-PET-positivity of lymph node metastases in proven lung cancer from contrast-enhanced CT using radiomics and machine learning |
title_fullStr | Inferring FDG-PET-positivity of lymph node metastases in proven lung cancer from contrast-enhanced CT using radiomics and machine learning |
title_full_unstemmed | Inferring FDG-PET-positivity of lymph node metastases in proven lung cancer from contrast-enhanced CT using radiomics and machine learning |
title_short | Inferring FDG-PET-positivity of lymph node metastases in proven lung cancer from contrast-enhanced CT using radiomics and machine learning |
title_sort | inferring fdg-pet-positivity of lymph node metastases in proven lung cancer from contrast-enhanced ct using radiomics and machine learning |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9474782/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36104467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-022-00296-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gorodetskiboris inferringfdgpetpositivityoflymphnodemetastasesinprovenlungcancerfromcontrastenhancedctusingradiomicsandmachinelearning AT beckerphilipphendrik inferringfdgpetpositivityoflymphnodemetastasesinprovenlungcancerfromcontrastenhancedctusingradiomicsandmachinelearning AT bauralexanderdanieljacques inferringfdgpetpositivityoflymphnodemetastasesinprovenlungcancerfromcontrastenhancedctusingradiomicsandmachinelearning AT hartensteinalexander inferringfdgpetpositivityoflymphnodemetastasesinprovenlungcancerfromcontrastenhancedctusingradiomicsandmachinelearning AT rogaschjulianmanuelmichael inferringfdgpetpositivityoflymphnodemetastasesinprovenlungcancerfromcontrastenhancedctusingradiomicsandmachinelearning AT furthchristian inferringfdgpetpositivityoflymphnodemetastasesinprovenlungcancerfromcontrastenhancedctusingradiomicsandmachinelearning AT amthauerholger inferringfdgpetpositivityoflymphnodemetastasesinprovenlungcancerfromcontrastenhancedctusingradiomicsandmachinelearning AT hammbernd inferringfdgpetpositivityoflymphnodemetastasesinprovenlungcancerfromcontrastenhancedctusingradiomicsandmachinelearning AT makowskimarcus inferringfdgpetpositivityoflymphnodemetastasesinprovenlungcancerfromcontrastenhancedctusingradiomicsandmachinelearning AT penzkofertobias inferringfdgpetpositivityoflymphnodemetastasesinprovenlungcancerfromcontrastenhancedctusingradiomicsandmachinelearning |