Cargando…
Vitrification within a nanoliter volume: oocyte and embryo cryopreservation within a 3D photopolymerized device
PURPOSE: Vitrification permits long-term banking of oocytes and embryos. It is a technically challenging procedure requiring direct handling and movement of cells between potentially cytotoxic cryoprotectant solutions. Variation in adherence to timing, and ability to trace cells during the procedure...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9474789/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35951146 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02589-8 |
_version_ | 1784789765988548608 |
---|---|
author | Yagoub, Suliman H. Lim, Megan Tan, Tiffany C. Y. Chow, Darren J. X. Dholakia, Kishan Gibson, Brant C. Thompson, Jeremy G. Dunning, Kylie R. |
author_facet | Yagoub, Suliman H. Lim, Megan Tan, Tiffany C. Y. Chow, Darren J. X. Dholakia, Kishan Gibson, Brant C. Thompson, Jeremy G. Dunning, Kylie R. |
author_sort | Yagoub, Suliman H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Vitrification permits long-term banking of oocytes and embryos. It is a technically challenging procedure requiring direct handling and movement of cells between potentially cytotoxic cryoprotectant solutions. Variation in adherence to timing, and ability to trace cells during the procedure, affects survival post-warming. We hypothesized that minimizing direct handling will simplify the procedure and improve traceability. To address this, we present a novel photopolymerized device that houses the sample during vitrification. METHODS: The fabricated device consisted of two components: the Pod and Garage. Single mouse oocytes or embryos were housed in a Pod, with multiple Pods docked into a Garage. The suitability of the device for cryogenic application was assessed by repeated vitrification and warming cycles. Oocytes or early blastocyst-stage embryos were vitrified either using standard practice or within Pods and a Garage and compared to non-vitrified control groups. Post-warming, we assessed survival rate, oocyte developmental potential (fertilization and subsequent development) and metabolism (autofluorescence). RESULTS: Vitrification within the device occurred within ~ 3 nL of cryoprotectant: this volume being ~ 1000-fold lower than standard vitrification. Compared to standard practice, vitrification and warming within our device showed no differences in viability, developmental competency, or metabolism for oocytes and embryos. The device housed the sample during processing, which improved traceability and minimized handling. Interestingly, vitrification-warming itself, altered oocyte and embryo metabolism. CONCLUSION: The Pod and Garage system minimized the volume of cryoprotectant at vitrification—by ~ 1000-fold—improved traceability and reduced direct handling of the sample. This is a major step in simplifying the procedure. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10815-022-02589-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9474789 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94747892022-09-16 Vitrification within a nanoliter volume: oocyte and embryo cryopreservation within a 3D photopolymerized device Yagoub, Suliman H. Lim, Megan Tan, Tiffany C. Y. Chow, Darren J. X. Dholakia, Kishan Gibson, Brant C. Thompson, Jeremy G. Dunning, Kylie R. J Assist Reprod Genet Technological Innovations PURPOSE: Vitrification permits long-term banking of oocytes and embryos. It is a technically challenging procedure requiring direct handling and movement of cells between potentially cytotoxic cryoprotectant solutions. Variation in adherence to timing, and ability to trace cells during the procedure, affects survival post-warming. We hypothesized that minimizing direct handling will simplify the procedure and improve traceability. To address this, we present a novel photopolymerized device that houses the sample during vitrification. METHODS: The fabricated device consisted of two components: the Pod and Garage. Single mouse oocytes or embryos were housed in a Pod, with multiple Pods docked into a Garage. The suitability of the device for cryogenic application was assessed by repeated vitrification and warming cycles. Oocytes or early blastocyst-stage embryos were vitrified either using standard practice or within Pods and a Garage and compared to non-vitrified control groups. Post-warming, we assessed survival rate, oocyte developmental potential (fertilization and subsequent development) and metabolism (autofluorescence). RESULTS: Vitrification within the device occurred within ~ 3 nL of cryoprotectant: this volume being ~ 1000-fold lower than standard vitrification. Compared to standard practice, vitrification and warming within our device showed no differences in viability, developmental competency, or metabolism for oocytes and embryos. The device housed the sample during processing, which improved traceability and minimized handling. Interestingly, vitrification-warming itself, altered oocyte and embryo metabolism. CONCLUSION: The Pod and Garage system minimized the volume of cryoprotectant at vitrification—by ~ 1000-fold—improved traceability and reduced direct handling of the sample. This is a major step in simplifying the procedure. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10815-022-02589-8. Springer US 2022-08-11 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9474789/ /pubmed/35951146 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02589-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Technological Innovations Yagoub, Suliman H. Lim, Megan Tan, Tiffany C. Y. Chow, Darren J. X. Dholakia, Kishan Gibson, Brant C. Thompson, Jeremy G. Dunning, Kylie R. Vitrification within a nanoliter volume: oocyte and embryo cryopreservation within a 3D photopolymerized device |
title | Vitrification within a nanoliter volume: oocyte and embryo cryopreservation within a 3D photopolymerized device |
title_full | Vitrification within a nanoliter volume: oocyte and embryo cryopreservation within a 3D photopolymerized device |
title_fullStr | Vitrification within a nanoliter volume: oocyte and embryo cryopreservation within a 3D photopolymerized device |
title_full_unstemmed | Vitrification within a nanoliter volume: oocyte and embryo cryopreservation within a 3D photopolymerized device |
title_short | Vitrification within a nanoliter volume: oocyte and embryo cryopreservation within a 3D photopolymerized device |
title_sort | vitrification within a nanoliter volume: oocyte and embryo cryopreservation within a 3d photopolymerized device |
topic | Technological Innovations |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9474789/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35951146 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02589-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yagoubsulimanh vitrificationwithinananolitervolumeoocyteandembryocryopreservationwithina3dphotopolymerizeddevice AT limmegan vitrificationwithinananolitervolumeoocyteandembryocryopreservationwithina3dphotopolymerizeddevice AT tantiffanycy vitrificationwithinananolitervolumeoocyteandembryocryopreservationwithina3dphotopolymerizeddevice AT chowdarrenjx vitrificationwithinananolitervolumeoocyteandembryocryopreservationwithina3dphotopolymerizeddevice AT dholakiakishan vitrificationwithinananolitervolumeoocyteandembryocryopreservationwithina3dphotopolymerizeddevice AT gibsonbrantc vitrificationwithinananolitervolumeoocyteandembryocryopreservationwithina3dphotopolymerizeddevice AT thompsonjeremyg vitrificationwithinananolitervolumeoocyteandembryocryopreservationwithina3dphotopolymerizeddevice AT dunningkylier vitrificationwithinananolitervolumeoocyteandembryocryopreservationwithina3dphotopolymerizeddevice |