Cargando…

Are experiment sample sizes adequate to detect biologically important interactions between multiple stressors?

As most ecosystems are being challenged by multiple, co‐occurring stressors, an important challenge is to understand and predict how stressors interact to affect biological responses. A popular approach is to design factorial experiments that measure biological responses to pairs of stressors and co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burgess, Benjamin J., Jackson, Michelle C., Murrell, David J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9475135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36177120
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9289
_version_ 1784789841715658752
author Burgess, Benjamin J.
Jackson, Michelle C.
Murrell, David J.
author_facet Burgess, Benjamin J.
Jackson, Michelle C.
Murrell, David J.
author_sort Burgess, Benjamin J.
collection PubMed
description As most ecosystems are being challenged by multiple, co‐occurring stressors, an important challenge is to understand and predict how stressors interact to affect biological responses. A popular approach is to design factorial experiments that measure biological responses to pairs of stressors and compare the observed response to a null model expectation. Unfortunately, we believe experiment sample sizes are inadequate to detect most non‐null stressor interaction responses, greatly hindering progress. Using both real and simulated data, we show sample sizes typical of many experiments (<6) can (i) only detect very large deviations from the additive null model, implying many important non‐null stressor‐pair interactions are being missed, and (ii) potentially lead to mostly statistical outliers being reported. Computer code that simulates data under either additive or multiplicative null models is provided to estimate statistical power for user‐defined responses and sample sizes, and we recommend this is used to aid experimental design and interpretation of results. We suspect that most experiments may require 20 or more replicates per treatment to have adequate power to detect nonadditive. However, estimates of power need to be made while considering the smallest interaction of interest, i.e., the lower limit for a biologically important interaction, which is likely to be system‐specific, meaning a general guide is unavailable. We discuss ways in which the smallest interaction of interest can be chosen, and how sample sizes can be increased. Our main analyses relate to the additive null model, but we show similar problems occur for the multiplicative null model, and we encourage similar investigations into the statistical power of other null models and inference methods. Without knowledge of the detection abilities of the statistical tools at hand or the definition of the smallest meaningful interaction, we will undoubtedly continue to miss important ecosystem stressor interactions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9475135
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94751352022-09-28 Are experiment sample sizes adequate to detect biologically important interactions between multiple stressors? Burgess, Benjamin J. Jackson, Michelle C. Murrell, David J. Ecol Evol Viewpoint As most ecosystems are being challenged by multiple, co‐occurring stressors, an important challenge is to understand and predict how stressors interact to affect biological responses. A popular approach is to design factorial experiments that measure biological responses to pairs of stressors and compare the observed response to a null model expectation. Unfortunately, we believe experiment sample sizes are inadequate to detect most non‐null stressor interaction responses, greatly hindering progress. Using both real and simulated data, we show sample sizes typical of many experiments (<6) can (i) only detect very large deviations from the additive null model, implying many important non‐null stressor‐pair interactions are being missed, and (ii) potentially lead to mostly statistical outliers being reported. Computer code that simulates data under either additive or multiplicative null models is provided to estimate statistical power for user‐defined responses and sample sizes, and we recommend this is used to aid experimental design and interpretation of results. We suspect that most experiments may require 20 or more replicates per treatment to have adequate power to detect nonadditive. However, estimates of power need to be made while considering the smallest interaction of interest, i.e., the lower limit for a biologically important interaction, which is likely to be system‐specific, meaning a general guide is unavailable. We discuss ways in which the smallest interaction of interest can be chosen, and how sample sizes can be increased. Our main analyses relate to the additive null model, but we show similar problems occur for the multiplicative null model, and we encourage similar investigations into the statistical power of other null models and inference methods. Without knowledge of the detection abilities of the statistical tools at hand or the definition of the smallest meaningful interaction, we will undoubtedly continue to miss important ecosystem stressor interactions. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9475135/ /pubmed/36177120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9289 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Viewpoint
Burgess, Benjamin J.
Jackson, Michelle C.
Murrell, David J.
Are experiment sample sizes adequate to detect biologically important interactions between multiple stressors?
title Are experiment sample sizes adequate to detect biologically important interactions between multiple stressors?
title_full Are experiment sample sizes adequate to detect biologically important interactions between multiple stressors?
title_fullStr Are experiment sample sizes adequate to detect biologically important interactions between multiple stressors?
title_full_unstemmed Are experiment sample sizes adequate to detect biologically important interactions between multiple stressors?
title_short Are experiment sample sizes adequate to detect biologically important interactions between multiple stressors?
title_sort are experiment sample sizes adequate to detect biologically important interactions between multiple stressors?
topic Viewpoint
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9475135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36177120
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9289
work_keys_str_mv AT burgessbenjaminj areexperimentsamplesizesadequatetodetectbiologicallyimportantinteractionsbetweenmultiplestressors
AT jacksonmichellec areexperimentsamplesizesadequatetodetectbiologicallyimportantinteractionsbetweenmultiplestressors
AT murrelldavidj areexperimentsamplesizesadequatetodetectbiologicallyimportantinteractionsbetweenmultiplestressors