The exploration of three different treatment models of osimertinib plus antiangiogenic agents in non‐small cell lung cancer: A real‐world study

BACKGROUND: Real‐world application of osimertinib with antiangiogenic agents in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is common, but the efficacy data are rarely reported. METHODS: To obtain an objective efficacy report of different real‐world treatment models of osimertinib and antiangiogenic agents. RESULTS: A total of 54 patients with NSCLC were enrolled into the study. Twelve (22.2%) who received a combination of antiangiogenic agents, when there was a trend of osimertinib resistance but did not reach imageology progressive disease (PD), were assigned to Group A, with a median overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS) of 48.0 (95% CI, not reached) and 21.0 (95% CI: 16.7–25.3) months, respectively. Thirty (55.6%) who received a combination of antiangiogenic agents when there was imageology PD during treatment with osimertinib were assigned to Group B, with a median OS and PFS of 31.8 (95% CI: 26.6–37.1) and 9.2 (95% CI: 5.9–12.6) months, respectively. Twelve (22.2%) who received a combination of antiangiogenic agents at the initial treatment with osimertinib were assigned to Group C, with a median OS and PFS of 28.5 (95% CI: 15.2–41.8) and 15.3 (95% CI: 7.9–22.7) months, respectively. Patients in Group A achieved a significant prolonged median PFS (p < 0.001) compared with Groups B and C. Absence of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M mutations (p = 0.043; hazard ratio [HR] = 2.124, 95% CI: 1.023–4.413) and no previous antiangiogenic agent application (p = 0.012; HR = 0.362, 95% CI: 0.163–0.863) were the independent prognostic factors of OS. CONCLUSION: The well‐timed action to combine antiangiogenic agents was when there was a trend of osimertinib resistance. The absence of EGFR T790M mutations and previous use of antiangiogenic agents were poor prognostic factors.