Cargando…
Validation of the general self-efficacy scale in french students for the prevention of student health
INTRODUCTION: The perceived self-efficacy, framed by Bandura, is one of the most important concepts within Cognitive Social (Villegas Barahona et al., 2018). General self-efficacy is defined, as the global confidence a person has in order to perform tasks successfully (Stanley & Murphy, 1997). T...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9476042/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.1226 |
_version_ | 1784790051817783296 |
---|---|
author | Saleh, D. Romo, L. Sweerts, S. Julien |
author_facet | Saleh, D. Romo, L. Sweerts, S. Julien |
author_sort | Saleh, D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The perceived self-efficacy, framed by Bandura, is one of the most important concepts within Cognitive Social (Villegas Barahona et al., 2018). General self-efficacy is defined, as the global confidence a person has in order to perform tasks successfully (Stanley & Murphy, 1997). The perception of stress may be more for people with lower level of self-efficacy (Shilpa & Prasad, 2017). OBJECTIVES: Students often suffer from stress (Saleh et al., 2019) and student health intervention and prevention programs must therefore act on this variable. The French version the General Self-Efficacy Scale could be an element for the validation of these programs. METHODS: 955 French students aged 17 to 67 (M = 22.22; SD = 5.1) participated to the study. We performed an Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) to determine the most appropriate factor structure then a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). RESULTS: Kaiser’s criterion pointed towards a one-factor model while Cattel’s criterion pointed towards a two-factor solution. Both models have been tested and the two-factor model seemed to be better. Indices showed an excellent fit between the model and the data (CFI = 0.97, TLI = 0.96, SRMR = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: We have tested two models and one of them, the two-factor model, presented better psychometric qualities. However, the one-factor result is also satisfactory and it will be discussed in the communication. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9476042 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94760422022-09-29 Validation of the general self-efficacy scale in french students for the prevention of student health Saleh, D. Romo, L. Sweerts, S. Julien Eur Psychiatry Abstract INTRODUCTION: The perceived self-efficacy, framed by Bandura, is one of the most important concepts within Cognitive Social (Villegas Barahona et al., 2018). General self-efficacy is defined, as the global confidence a person has in order to perform tasks successfully (Stanley & Murphy, 1997). The perception of stress may be more for people with lower level of self-efficacy (Shilpa & Prasad, 2017). OBJECTIVES: Students often suffer from stress (Saleh et al., 2019) and student health intervention and prevention programs must therefore act on this variable. The French version the General Self-Efficacy Scale could be an element for the validation of these programs. METHODS: 955 French students aged 17 to 67 (M = 22.22; SD = 5.1) participated to the study. We performed an Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) to determine the most appropriate factor structure then a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). RESULTS: Kaiser’s criterion pointed towards a one-factor model while Cattel’s criterion pointed towards a two-factor solution. Both models have been tested and the two-factor model seemed to be better. Indices showed an excellent fit between the model and the data (CFI = 0.97, TLI = 0.96, SRMR = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: We have tested two models and one of them, the two-factor model, presented better psychometric qualities. However, the one-factor result is also satisfactory and it will be discussed in the communication. Cambridge University Press 2021-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9476042/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.1226 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Abstract Saleh, D. Romo, L. Sweerts, S. Julien Validation of the general self-efficacy scale in french students for the prevention of student health |
title | Validation of the general self-efficacy scale in french students for the prevention of student health |
title_full | Validation of the general self-efficacy scale in french students for the prevention of student health |
title_fullStr | Validation of the general self-efficacy scale in french students for the prevention of student health |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of the general self-efficacy scale in french students for the prevention of student health |
title_short | Validation of the general self-efficacy scale in french students for the prevention of student health |
title_sort | validation of the general self-efficacy scale in french students for the prevention of student health |
topic | Abstract |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9476042/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.1226 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT salehd validationofthegeneralselfefficacyscaleinfrenchstudentsforthepreventionofstudenthealth AT romol validationofthegeneralselfefficacyscaleinfrenchstudentsforthepreventionofstudenthealth AT sweertssjulien validationofthegeneralselfefficacyscaleinfrenchstudentsforthepreventionofstudenthealth |