Cargando…
Guiding organisational decision-making about COVID-19 asymptomatic testing in workplaces: mixed-method study to inform an ethical framework
BACKGROUND: Workplace programmes to test staff for asymptomatic COVID-19 infection have become common, but raise a number of ethical challenges. In this article, we report the findings of a consultation that informed the development of an ethical framework for organisational decision-making about su...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9476340/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36109810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13993-1 |
_version_ | 1784790115584835584 |
---|---|
author | van der Scheer, Jan W. Ansari, Akbar McLaughlin, Meredith Cox, Caitríona Liddell, Kathleen Burt, Jenni George, Jenny Kenny, Rebecca Cousens, Ruth Leach, Brandi McGowan, James Morley, Katherine Willars, Janet Dixon-Woods, Mary |
author_facet | van der Scheer, Jan W. Ansari, Akbar McLaughlin, Meredith Cox, Caitríona Liddell, Kathleen Burt, Jenni George, Jenny Kenny, Rebecca Cousens, Ruth Leach, Brandi McGowan, James Morley, Katherine Willars, Janet Dixon-Woods, Mary |
author_sort | van der Scheer, Jan W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Workplace programmes to test staff for asymptomatic COVID-19 infection have become common, but raise a number of ethical challenges. In this article, we report the findings of a consultation that informed the development of an ethical framework for organisational decision-making about such programmes. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-method consultation – a survey and semi-structured interviews during November–December 2020 in a UK case study organisation that had introduced asymptomatic testing for all staff working on-site in its buildings. Analysis of closed-ended survey data was conducted descriptively. An analysis approach based on the Framework Method was used for the open-ended survey responses and interview data. The analyses were then integrated to facilitate systematic analysis across themes. Inferences were based on the integrated findings and combined with other inputs (literature review, ethical analysis, legal and public health guidance, expert discussions) to develop an ethical framework. RESULTS: The consultation involved 61 staff members from the case study organisation (50 survey respondents and 11 interview participants). There was strong support for the asymptomatic testing programme: 90% of the survey respondents viewed it as helpful or very helpful. Open-ended survey responses and interviews gave insight into participants’ concerns, including those relating to goal drift, risk of false negatives, and potential negative impacts for household members and people whose roles lacked contractual and financial stability. Integration of the consultation findings and the other inputs identified the importance of a whole-system approach with appropriate support for the key control measure of isolation following positive tests. The need to build trust in the testing programme, for example through effective communication from leaders, was also emphasised. CONCLUSIONS: The consultation, together with other inputs, informed an ethical framework intended to support employers. The framework may support organisational decision-making in areas ranging from design and operation of the programme through to choices about participation. The framework is likely to benefit from further consultation and refinement in new settings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-13993-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9476340 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94763402022-09-15 Guiding organisational decision-making about COVID-19 asymptomatic testing in workplaces: mixed-method study to inform an ethical framework van der Scheer, Jan W. Ansari, Akbar McLaughlin, Meredith Cox, Caitríona Liddell, Kathleen Burt, Jenni George, Jenny Kenny, Rebecca Cousens, Ruth Leach, Brandi McGowan, James Morley, Katherine Willars, Janet Dixon-Woods, Mary BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: Workplace programmes to test staff for asymptomatic COVID-19 infection have become common, but raise a number of ethical challenges. In this article, we report the findings of a consultation that informed the development of an ethical framework for organisational decision-making about such programmes. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-method consultation – a survey and semi-structured interviews during November–December 2020 in a UK case study organisation that had introduced asymptomatic testing for all staff working on-site in its buildings. Analysis of closed-ended survey data was conducted descriptively. An analysis approach based on the Framework Method was used for the open-ended survey responses and interview data. The analyses were then integrated to facilitate systematic analysis across themes. Inferences were based on the integrated findings and combined with other inputs (literature review, ethical analysis, legal and public health guidance, expert discussions) to develop an ethical framework. RESULTS: The consultation involved 61 staff members from the case study organisation (50 survey respondents and 11 interview participants). There was strong support for the asymptomatic testing programme: 90% of the survey respondents viewed it as helpful or very helpful. Open-ended survey responses and interviews gave insight into participants’ concerns, including those relating to goal drift, risk of false negatives, and potential negative impacts for household members and people whose roles lacked contractual and financial stability. Integration of the consultation findings and the other inputs identified the importance of a whole-system approach with appropriate support for the key control measure of isolation following positive tests. The need to build trust in the testing programme, for example through effective communication from leaders, was also emphasised. CONCLUSIONS: The consultation, together with other inputs, informed an ethical framework intended to support employers. The framework may support organisational decision-making in areas ranging from design and operation of the programme through to choices about participation. The framework is likely to benefit from further consultation and refinement in new settings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-13993-1. BioMed Central 2022-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9476340/ /pubmed/36109810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13993-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research van der Scheer, Jan W. Ansari, Akbar McLaughlin, Meredith Cox, Caitríona Liddell, Kathleen Burt, Jenni George, Jenny Kenny, Rebecca Cousens, Ruth Leach, Brandi McGowan, James Morley, Katherine Willars, Janet Dixon-Woods, Mary Guiding organisational decision-making about COVID-19 asymptomatic testing in workplaces: mixed-method study to inform an ethical framework |
title | Guiding organisational decision-making about COVID-19 asymptomatic testing in workplaces: mixed-method study to inform an ethical framework |
title_full | Guiding organisational decision-making about COVID-19 asymptomatic testing in workplaces: mixed-method study to inform an ethical framework |
title_fullStr | Guiding organisational decision-making about COVID-19 asymptomatic testing in workplaces: mixed-method study to inform an ethical framework |
title_full_unstemmed | Guiding organisational decision-making about COVID-19 asymptomatic testing in workplaces: mixed-method study to inform an ethical framework |
title_short | Guiding organisational decision-making about COVID-19 asymptomatic testing in workplaces: mixed-method study to inform an ethical framework |
title_sort | guiding organisational decision-making about covid-19 asymptomatic testing in workplaces: mixed-method study to inform an ethical framework |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9476340/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36109810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13993-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanderscheerjanw guidingorganisationaldecisionmakingaboutcovid19asymptomatictestinginworkplacesmixedmethodstudytoinformanethicalframework AT ansariakbar guidingorganisationaldecisionmakingaboutcovid19asymptomatictestinginworkplacesmixedmethodstudytoinformanethicalframework AT mclaughlinmeredith guidingorganisationaldecisionmakingaboutcovid19asymptomatictestinginworkplacesmixedmethodstudytoinformanethicalframework AT coxcaitriona guidingorganisationaldecisionmakingaboutcovid19asymptomatictestinginworkplacesmixedmethodstudytoinformanethicalframework AT liddellkathleen guidingorganisationaldecisionmakingaboutcovid19asymptomatictestinginworkplacesmixedmethodstudytoinformanethicalframework AT burtjenni guidingorganisationaldecisionmakingaboutcovid19asymptomatictestinginworkplacesmixedmethodstudytoinformanethicalframework AT georgejenny guidingorganisationaldecisionmakingaboutcovid19asymptomatictestinginworkplacesmixedmethodstudytoinformanethicalframework AT kennyrebecca guidingorganisationaldecisionmakingaboutcovid19asymptomatictestinginworkplacesmixedmethodstudytoinformanethicalframework AT cousensruth guidingorganisationaldecisionmakingaboutcovid19asymptomatictestinginworkplacesmixedmethodstudytoinformanethicalframework AT leachbrandi guidingorganisationaldecisionmakingaboutcovid19asymptomatictestinginworkplacesmixedmethodstudytoinformanethicalframework AT mcgowanjames guidingorganisationaldecisionmakingaboutcovid19asymptomatictestinginworkplacesmixedmethodstudytoinformanethicalframework AT morleykatherine guidingorganisationaldecisionmakingaboutcovid19asymptomatictestinginworkplacesmixedmethodstudytoinformanethicalframework AT willarsjanet guidingorganisationaldecisionmakingaboutcovid19asymptomatictestinginworkplacesmixedmethodstudytoinformanethicalframework AT dixonwoodsmary guidingorganisationaldecisionmakingaboutcovid19asymptomatictestinginworkplacesmixedmethodstudytoinformanethicalframework |