Cargando…
Optimization of an Antibody Microarray Printing Process Using a Designed Experiment
[Image: see text] Antibody microarrays have proven useful in immunoassay-based point-of-care diagnostics for infectious diseases. Noncontact piezoelectric inkjet printing has advantages to print antibody microarrays on nitrocellulose substrates for this application due to its compatibility with sens...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2022
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9476517/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36120062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c03595 |
_version_ | 1784790156178358272 |
---|---|
author | Summers, Alexander J. Devadhasan, Jasmine P. Gu, Jian Montgomery, Douglas C. Fischer, Brittany Gates-Hollingsworth, Marcellene A. Pflughoeft, Kathryn J. Vo-Dinh, Tuan AuCoin, David P. Zenhausern, Frederic |
author_facet | Summers, Alexander J. Devadhasan, Jasmine P. Gu, Jian Montgomery, Douglas C. Fischer, Brittany Gates-Hollingsworth, Marcellene A. Pflughoeft, Kathryn J. Vo-Dinh, Tuan AuCoin, David P. Zenhausern, Frederic |
author_sort | Summers, Alexander J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] Antibody microarrays have proven useful in immunoassay-based point-of-care diagnostics for infectious diseases. Noncontact piezoelectric inkjet printing has advantages to print antibody microarrays on nitrocellulose substrates for this application due to its compatibility with sensitive solutions and substrates, simple droplet control, and potential for high-capacity printing. However, there remain real-world challenges in printing such microarrays, which motivated this study. The effects of three concentrations of capture antibody (cAb) reagents and nozzle hydrostatic pressures were chosen to investigate three responses: the number of printed membrane disks, dispensing performance, and microarray quality. Printing conditions were found to be most ideal with 5 mg/mL cAb and a nozzle hydrostatic pressure near zero, which produced 130 membrane disks in a single print versus the 10 membrane disks per print before optimization. These results serve to inform efficient printing of antibody microarrays on nitrocellulose membranes for rapid immunoassay-based detection of infectious diseases and beyond. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9476517 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94765172022-09-16 Optimization of an Antibody Microarray Printing Process Using a Designed Experiment Summers, Alexander J. Devadhasan, Jasmine P. Gu, Jian Montgomery, Douglas C. Fischer, Brittany Gates-Hollingsworth, Marcellene A. Pflughoeft, Kathryn J. Vo-Dinh, Tuan AuCoin, David P. Zenhausern, Frederic ACS Omega [Image: see text] Antibody microarrays have proven useful in immunoassay-based point-of-care diagnostics for infectious diseases. Noncontact piezoelectric inkjet printing has advantages to print antibody microarrays on nitrocellulose substrates for this application due to its compatibility with sensitive solutions and substrates, simple droplet control, and potential for high-capacity printing. However, there remain real-world challenges in printing such microarrays, which motivated this study. The effects of three concentrations of capture antibody (cAb) reagents and nozzle hydrostatic pressures were chosen to investigate three responses: the number of printed membrane disks, dispensing performance, and microarray quality. Printing conditions were found to be most ideal with 5 mg/mL cAb and a nozzle hydrostatic pressure near zero, which produced 130 membrane disks in a single print versus the 10 membrane disks per print before optimization. These results serve to inform efficient printing of antibody microarrays on nitrocellulose membranes for rapid immunoassay-based detection of infectious diseases and beyond. American Chemical Society 2022-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9476517/ /pubmed/36120062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c03595 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Permits non-commercial access and re-use, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained; but does not permit creation of adaptations or other derivative works (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Summers, Alexander J. Devadhasan, Jasmine P. Gu, Jian Montgomery, Douglas C. Fischer, Brittany Gates-Hollingsworth, Marcellene A. Pflughoeft, Kathryn J. Vo-Dinh, Tuan AuCoin, David P. Zenhausern, Frederic Optimization of an Antibody Microarray Printing Process Using a Designed Experiment |
title | Optimization of
an Antibody Microarray Printing Process
Using a Designed Experiment |
title_full | Optimization of
an Antibody Microarray Printing Process
Using a Designed Experiment |
title_fullStr | Optimization of
an Antibody Microarray Printing Process
Using a Designed Experiment |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimization of
an Antibody Microarray Printing Process
Using a Designed Experiment |
title_short | Optimization of
an Antibody Microarray Printing Process
Using a Designed Experiment |
title_sort | optimization of
an antibody microarray printing process
using a designed experiment |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9476517/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36120062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c03595 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT summersalexanderj optimizationofanantibodymicroarrayprintingprocessusingadesignedexperiment AT devadhasanjasminep optimizationofanantibodymicroarrayprintingprocessusingadesignedexperiment AT gujian optimizationofanantibodymicroarrayprintingprocessusingadesignedexperiment AT montgomerydouglasc optimizationofanantibodymicroarrayprintingprocessusingadesignedexperiment AT fischerbrittany optimizationofanantibodymicroarrayprintingprocessusingadesignedexperiment AT gateshollingsworthmarcellenea optimizationofanantibodymicroarrayprintingprocessusingadesignedexperiment AT pflughoeftkathrynj optimizationofanantibodymicroarrayprintingprocessusingadesignedexperiment AT vodinhtuan optimizationofanantibodymicroarrayprintingprocessusingadesignedexperiment AT aucoindavidp optimizationofanantibodymicroarrayprintingprocessusingadesignedexperiment AT zenhausernfrederic optimizationofanantibodymicroarrayprintingprocessusingadesignedexperiment |