Cargando…
Exploring the relationship between age and prognosis in glioma: rethinking current age stratification
BACKGROUND: The age of glioma plays a unique role in prognosis. We hypothesized that age is not positively correlated with survival prognosis and explored its exact relationship. METHODS: Glioma was identified from the SEER database (between 2000 and 2018). A multivariate Cox proportional regression...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9476578/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36109699 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-022-02879-9 |
_version_ | 1784790169557139456 |
---|---|
author | Jia, Zetian Li, Xiaohui Yan, Yaqi Shen, Xuxuan Wang, Jiuxin Yang, He Liu, Shuo Han, Chengxi Hu, Yuhua |
author_facet | Jia, Zetian Li, Xiaohui Yan, Yaqi Shen, Xuxuan Wang, Jiuxin Yang, He Liu, Shuo Han, Chengxi Hu, Yuhua |
author_sort | Jia, Zetian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The age of glioma plays a unique role in prognosis. We hypothesized that age is not positively correlated with survival prognosis and explored its exact relationship. METHODS: Glioma was identified from the SEER database (between 2000 and 2018). A multivariate Cox proportional regression model and restricted cubic spline (RCS) plot were used to assess the relationship between age and prognosis. RESULTS: A total of 66465 patients with glioma were included. Hazard ratios (HR) for ten-year by age: 0–9 years, HR 1.06 (0.93–1.20); 10–19 years: reference; 20–29 years, HR 0.90 (0.82–1.00); 30–39 years, HR 1.14 (1.04–1.25); 40–49 years, HR 2.09 (1.91–2.28); 50–59 years, HR 3.48 (3.19–3.79); 60–69 years, HR 4.91 (4.51–5.35);70–79 years, HR 7.95 (7.29–8.66); 80–84 years, HR 12.85 (11.74–14.06). After adjusting for covariates, the prognosis was not positively correlated with age. The smooth curve of RCS revealed this non-linear relationship: HR increased to 10 years first, decreased to 23 years, reached its lowest point, and became J-shaped. CONCLUSION: The relationship between age and glioma prognosis is non-linear. These results challenge the applicability of current age groupings for gliomas and advocate the consideration of individualized treatment guided by precise age. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12883-022-02879-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9476578 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94765782022-09-16 Exploring the relationship between age and prognosis in glioma: rethinking current age stratification Jia, Zetian Li, Xiaohui Yan, Yaqi Shen, Xuxuan Wang, Jiuxin Yang, He Liu, Shuo Han, Chengxi Hu, Yuhua BMC Neurol Research BACKGROUND: The age of glioma plays a unique role in prognosis. We hypothesized that age is not positively correlated with survival prognosis and explored its exact relationship. METHODS: Glioma was identified from the SEER database (between 2000 and 2018). A multivariate Cox proportional regression model and restricted cubic spline (RCS) plot were used to assess the relationship between age and prognosis. RESULTS: A total of 66465 patients with glioma were included. Hazard ratios (HR) for ten-year by age: 0–9 years, HR 1.06 (0.93–1.20); 10–19 years: reference; 20–29 years, HR 0.90 (0.82–1.00); 30–39 years, HR 1.14 (1.04–1.25); 40–49 years, HR 2.09 (1.91–2.28); 50–59 years, HR 3.48 (3.19–3.79); 60–69 years, HR 4.91 (4.51–5.35);70–79 years, HR 7.95 (7.29–8.66); 80–84 years, HR 12.85 (11.74–14.06). After adjusting for covariates, the prognosis was not positively correlated with age. The smooth curve of RCS revealed this non-linear relationship: HR increased to 10 years first, decreased to 23 years, reached its lowest point, and became J-shaped. CONCLUSION: The relationship between age and glioma prognosis is non-linear. These results challenge the applicability of current age groupings for gliomas and advocate the consideration of individualized treatment guided by precise age. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12883-022-02879-9. BioMed Central 2022-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9476578/ /pubmed/36109699 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-022-02879-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Jia, Zetian Li, Xiaohui Yan, Yaqi Shen, Xuxuan Wang, Jiuxin Yang, He Liu, Shuo Han, Chengxi Hu, Yuhua Exploring the relationship between age and prognosis in glioma: rethinking current age stratification |
title | Exploring the relationship between age and prognosis in glioma: rethinking current age stratification |
title_full | Exploring the relationship between age and prognosis in glioma: rethinking current age stratification |
title_fullStr | Exploring the relationship between age and prognosis in glioma: rethinking current age stratification |
title_full_unstemmed | Exploring the relationship between age and prognosis in glioma: rethinking current age stratification |
title_short | Exploring the relationship between age and prognosis in glioma: rethinking current age stratification |
title_sort | exploring the relationship between age and prognosis in glioma: rethinking current age stratification |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9476578/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36109699 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-022-02879-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jiazetian exploringtherelationshipbetweenageandprognosisingliomarethinkingcurrentagestratification AT lixiaohui exploringtherelationshipbetweenageandprognosisingliomarethinkingcurrentagestratification AT yanyaqi exploringtherelationshipbetweenageandprognosisingliomarethinkingcurrentagestratification AT shenxuxuan exploringtherelationshipbetweenageandprognosisingliomarethinkingcurrentagestratification AT wangjiuxin exploringtherelationshipbetweenageandprognosisingliomarethinkingcurrentagestratification AT yanghe exploringtherelationshipbetweenageandprognosisingliomarethinkingcurrentagestratification AT liushuo exploringtherelationshipbetweenageandprognosisingliomarethinkingcurrentagestratification AT hanchengxi exploringtherelationshipbetweenageandprognosisingliomarethinkingcurrentagestratification AT huyuhua exploringtherelationshipbetweenageandprognosisingliomarethinkingcurrentagestratification |