Cargando…
Performance evaluation of the Roche Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays by comparison with neutralizing antibodies and clinical assessment
Quantitative measurement of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies is highly expected to evaluate immune status, vaccine response, and antiviral therapy. The Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S (Elecsys® anti-S) was developed to measure anti-SARS-CoV-2 S proteins. We sought to investigate whether Elecsys® anti-S...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9477342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36107911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274181 |
_version_ | 1784790339568009216 |
---|---|
author | Takei, Satomi Ai, Tomohiko Yamamoto, Takamasa Igawa, Gene Kanno, Takayuki Tobiume, Minoru Hiki, Makoto Saito, Kaori Khasawneh, Abdullah Wakita, Mitsuru Misawa, Shigeki Miida, Takashi Okuzawa, Atsushi Suzuki, Tadaki Takahashi, Kazuhisa Naito, Toshio Tabe, Yoko |
author_facet | Takei, Satomi Ai, Tomohiko Yamamoto, Takamasa Igawa, Gene Kanno, Takayuki Tobiume, Minoru Hiki, Makoto Saito, Kaori Khasawneh, Abdullah Wakita, Mitsuru Misawa, Shigeki Miida, Takashi Okuzawa, Atsushi Suzuki, Tadaki Takahashi, Kazuhisa Naito, Toshio Tabe, Yoko |
author_sort | Takei, Satomi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Quantitative measurement of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies is highly expected to evaluate immune status, vaccine response, and antiviral therapy. The Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S (Elecsys® anti-S) was developed to measure anti-SARS-CoV-2 S proteins. We sought to investigate whether Elecsys® anti-S can be used to predict neutralizing activities in patients’ serums using an authentic virus neutralization assay. One hundred forty-six serum samples were obtained from 59 patients with COVID-19 at multiple time points. Of the 59 patients, 44 cases were included in Group M (mild 23, moderate 21) and produced 84 samples (mild 35, moderate 49), while 15 cases were included in Group S (severe 11, critical 4) and produced 62 samples (severe 43, critical 19). The neutralization assay detected 73% positive cases, and Elecsys® anti-S and Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 (Elecsys® anti-N) showed 72% and 66% positive cases, respectively. A linear correlation between the Elecsys® anti-S assay and the neutralization assay were highly correlated (r = 0.7253, r(2) = 0.5261) than a linear correlation between the Elecsys® anti-N and neutralization assay (r = 0.5824, r(2) = 0.3392). The levels of Elecsys® anti-S antibody and neutralizing activities were significantly higher in Group S than in Group M after 6 weeks from onset of symptoms (p < 0.05). Conversely, the levels of Elecsys® anti-N were comparable in both groups. Three immunosuppressed patients, including cancer patients, showed low levels of anti-S and anti-N antibodies and neutralizing activities throughout the measurement period, indicating the need for careful follow-up. Our data indicate that Elecsys® anti-S can predict the neutralization antibodies in COVID-19. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9477342 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94773422022-09-16 Performance evaluation of the Roche Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays by comparison with neutralizing antibodies and clinical assessment Takei, Satomi Ai, Tomohiko Yamamoto, Takamasa Igawa, Gene Kanno, Takayuki Tobiume, Minoru Hiki, Makoto Saito, Kaori Khasawneh, Abdullah Wakita, Mitsuru Misawa, Shigeki Miida, Takashi Okuzawa, Atsushi Suzuki, Tadaki Takahashi, Kazuhisa Naito, Toshio Tabe, Yoko PLoS One Research Article Quantitative measurement of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies is highly expected to evaluate immune status, vaccine response, and antiviral therapy. The Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S (Elecsys® anti-S) was developed to measure anti-SARS-CoV-2 S proteins. We sought to investigate whether Elecsys® anti-S can be used to predict neutralizing activities in patients’ serums using an authentic virus neutralization assay. One hundred forty-six serum samples were obtained from 59 patients with COVID-19 at multiple time points. Of the 59 patients, 44 cases were included in Group M (mild 23, moderate 21) and produced 84 samples (mild 35, moderate 49), while 15 cases were included in Group S (severe 11, critical 4) and produced 62 samples (severe 43, critical 19). The neutralization assay detected 73% positive cases, and Elecsys® anti-S and Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 (Elecsys® anti-N) showed 72% and 66% positive cases, respectively. A linear correlation between the Elecsys® anti-S assay and the neutralization assay were highly correlated (r = 0.7253, r(2) = 0.5261) than a linear correlation between the Elecsys® anti-N and neutralization assay (r = 0.5824, r(2) = 0.3392). The levels of Elecsys® anti-S antibody and neutralizing activities were significantly higher in Group S than in Group M after 6 weeks from onset of symptoms (p < 0.05). Conversely, the levels of Elecsys® anti-N were comparable in both groups. Three immunosuppressed patients, including cancer patients, showed low levels of anti-S and anti-N antibodies and neutralizing activities throughout the measurement period, indicating the need for careful follow-up. Our data indicate that Elecsys® anti-S can predict the neutralization antibodies in COVID-19. Public Library of Science 2022-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9477342/ /pubmed/36107911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274181 Text en © 2022 Takei et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Takei, Satomi Ai, Tomohiko Yamamoto, Takamasa Igawa, Gene Kanno, Takayuki Tobiume, Minoru Hiki, Makoto Saito, Kaori Khasawneh, Abdullah Wakita, Mitsuru Misawa, Shigeki Miida, Takashi Okuzawa, Atsushi Suzuki, Tadaki Takahashi, Kazuhisa Naito, Toshio Tabe, Yoko Performance evaluation of the Roche Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays by comparison with neutralizing antibodies and clinical assessment |
title | Performance evaluation of the Roche Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays by comparison with neutralizing antibodies and clinical assessment |
title_full | Performance evaluation of the Roche Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays by comparison with neutralizing antibodies and clinical assessment |
title_fullStr | Performance evaluation of the Roche Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays by comparison with neutralizing antibodies and clinical assessment |
title_full_unstemmed | Performance evaluation of the Roche Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays by comparison with neutralizing antibodies and clinical assessment |
title_short | Performance evaluation of the Roche Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays by comparison with neutralizing antibodies and clinical assessment |
title_sort | performance evaluation of the roche elecsys® anti-sars-cov-2 immunoassays by comparison with neutralizing antibodies and clinical assessment |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9477342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36107911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274181 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT takeisatomi performanceevaluationoftherocheelecsysantisarscov2immunoassaysbycomparisonwithneutralizingantibodiesandclinicalassessment AT aitomohiko performanceevaluationoftherocheelecsysantisarscov2immunoassaysbycomparisonwithneutralizingantibodiesandclinicalassessment AT yamamototakamasa performanceevaluationoftherocheelecsysantisarscov2immunoassaysbycomparisonwithneutralizingantibodiesandclinicalassessment AT igawagene performanceevaluationoftherocheelecsysantisarscov2immunoassaysbycomparisonwithneutralizingantibodiesandclinicalassessment AT kannotakayuki performanceevaluationoftherocheelecsysantisarscov2immunoassaysbycomparisonwithneutralizingantibodiesandclinicalassessment AT tobiumeminoru performanceevaluationoftherocheelecsysantisarscov2immunoassaysbycomparisonwithneutralizingantibodiesandclinicalassessment AT hikimakoto performanceevaluationoftherocheelecsysantisarscov2immunoassaysbycomparisonwithneutralizingantibodiesandclinicalassessment AT saitokaori performanceevaluationoftherocheelecsysantisarscov2immunoassaysbycomparisonwithneutralizingantibodiesandclinicalassessment AT khasawnehabdullah performanceevaluationoftherocheelecsysantisarscov2immunoassaysbycomparisonwithneutralizingantibodiesandclinicalassessment AT wakitamitsuru performanceevaluationoftherocheelecsysantisarscov2immunoassaysbycomparisonwithneutralizingantibodiesandclinicalassessment AT misawashigeki performanceevaluationoftherocheelecsysantisarscov2immunoassaysbycomparisonwithneutralizingantibodiesandclinicalassessment AT miidatakashi performanceevaluationoftherocheelecsysantisarscov2immunoassaysbycomparisonwithneutralizingantibodiesandclinicalassessment AT okuzawaatsushi performanceevaluationoftherocheelecsysantisarscov2immunoassaysbycomparisonwithneutralizingantibodiesandclinicalassessment AT suzukitadaki performanceevaluationoftherocheelecsysantisarscov2immunoassaysbycomparisonwithneutralizingantibodiesandclinicalassessment AT takahashikazuhisa performanceevaluationoftherocheelecsysantisarscov2immunoassaysbycomparisonwithneutralizingantibodiesandclinicalassessment AT naitotoshio performanceevaluationoftherocheelecsysantisarscov2immunoassaysbycomparisonwithneutralizingantibodiesandclinicalassessment AT tabeyoko performanceevaluationoftherocheelecsysantisarscov2immunoassaysbycomparisonwithneutralizingantibodiesandclinicalassessment |