Cargando…
Expectation effects in working memory training
There is a growing body of research focused on developing and evaluating behavioral training paradigms meant to induce enhancements in cognitive function. It has recently been proposed that one mechanism through which such performance gains could be induced involves participants’ expectations of imp...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Academy of Sciences
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9477404/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36067292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2209308119 |
_version_ | 1784790354813255680 |
---|---|
author | Parong, Jocelyn Seitz, Aaron R. Jaeggi, Susanne M. Green, C. Shawn |
author_facet | Parong, Jocelyn Seitz, Aaron R. Jaeggi, Susanne M. Green, C. Shawn |
author_sort | Parong, Jocelyn |
collection | PubMed |
description | There is a growing body of research focused on developing and evaluating behavioral training paradigms meant to induce enhancements in cognitive function. It has recently been proposed that one mechanism through which such performance gains could be induced involves participants’ expectations of improvement. However, no work to date has evaluated whether it is possible to cause changes in cognitive function in a long-term behavioral training study by manipulating expectations. In this study, positive or negative expectations about cognitive training were both explicitly and associatively induced before either a working memory training intervention or a control intervention. Consistent with previous work, a main effect of the training condition was found, with individuals trained on the working memory task showing larger gains in cognitive function than those trained on the control task. Interestingly, a main effect of expectation was also found, with individuals given positive expectations showing larger cognitive gains than those who were given negative expectations (regardless of training condition). No interaction effect between training and expectations was found. Exploratory analyses suggest that certain individual characteristics (e.g., personality, motivation) moderate the size of the expectation effect. These results highlight aspects of methodology that can inform future behavioral interventions and suggest that participant expectations could be capitalized on to maximize training outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9477404 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | National Academy of Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94774042022-09-16 Expectation effects in working memory training Parong, Jocelyn Seitz, Aaron R. Jaeggi, Susanne M. Green, C. Shawn Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Social Sciences There is a growing body of research focused on developing and evaluating behavioral training paradigms meant to induce enhancements in cognitive function. It has recently been proposed that one mechanism through which such performance gains could be induced involves participants’ expectations of improvement. However, no work to date has evaluated whether it is possible to cause changes in cognitive function in a long-term behavioral training study by manipulating expectations. In this study, positive or negative expectations about cognitive training were both explicitly and associatively induced before either a working memory training intervention or a control intervention. Consistent with previous work, a main effect of the training condition was found, with individuals trained on the working memory task showing larger gains in cognitive function than those trained on the control task. Interestingly, a main effect of expectation was also found, with individuals given positive expectations showing larger cognitive gains than those who were given negative expectations (regardless of training condition). No interaction effect between training and expectations was found. Exploratory analyses suggest that certain individual characteristics (e.g., personality, motivation) moderate the size of the expectation effect. These results highlight aspects of methodology that can inform future behavioral interventions and suggest that participant expectations could be capitalized on to maximize training outcomes. National Academy of Sciences 2022-09-06 2022-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9477404/ /pubmed/36067292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2209308119 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Social Sciences Parong, Jocelyn Seitz, Aaron R. Jaeggi, Susanne M. Green, C. Shawn Expectation effects in working memory training |
title | Expectation effects in working memory training |
title_full | Expectation effects in working memory training |
title_fullStr | Expectation effects in working memory training |
title_full_unstemmed | Expectation effects in working memory training |
title_short | Expectation effects in working memory training |
title_sort | expectation effects in working memory training |
topic | Social Sciences |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9477404/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36067292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2209308119 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parongjocelyn expectationeffectsinworkingmemorytraining AT seitzaaronr expectationeffectsinworkingmemorytraining AT jaeggisusannem expectationeffectsinworkingmemorytraining AT greencshawn expectationeffectsinworkingmemorytraining |