Cargando…

Expectation effects in working memory training

There is a growing body of research focused on developing and evaluating behavioral training paradigms meant to induce enhancements in cognitive function. It has recently been proposed that one mechanism through which such performance gains could be induced involves participants’ expectations of imp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parong, Jocelyn, Seitz, Aaron R., Jaeggi, Susanne M., Green, C. Shawn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Academy of Sciences 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9477404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36067292
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2209308119
_version_ 1784790354813255680
author Parong, Jocelyn
Seitz, Aaron R.
Jaeggi, Susanne M.
Green, C. Shawn
author_facet Parong, Jocelyn
Seitz, Aaron R.
Jaeggi, Susanne M.
Green, C. Shawn
author_sort Parong, Jocelyn
collection PubMed
description There is a growing body of research focused on developing and evaluating behavioral training paradigms meant to induce enhancements in cognitive function. It has recently been proposed that one mechanism through which such performance gains could be induced involves participants’ expectations of improvement. However, no work to date has evaluated whether it is possible to cause changes in cognitive function in a long-term behavioral training study by manipulating expectations. In this study, positive or negative expectations about cognitive training were both explicitly and associatively induced before either a working memory training intervention or a control intervention. Consistent with previous work, a main effect of the training condition was found, with individuals trained on the working memory task showing larger gains in cognitive function than those trained on the control task. Interestingly, a main effect of expectation was also found, with individuals given positive expectations showing larger cognitive gains than those who were given negative expectations (regardless of training condition). No interaction effect between training and expectations was found. Exploratory analyses suggest that certain individual characteristics (e.g., personality, motivation) moderate the size of the expectation effect. These results highlight aspects of methodology that can inform future behavioral interventions and suggest that participant expectations could be capitalized on to maximize training outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9477404
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher National Academy of Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94774042022-09-16 Expectation effects in working memory training Parong, Jocelyn Seitz, Aaron R. Jaeggi, Susanne M. Green, C. Shawn Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Social Sciences There is a growing body of research focused on developing and evaluating behavioral training paradigms meant to induce enhancements in cognitive function. It has recently been proposed that one mechanism through which such performance gains could be induced involves participants’ expectations of improvement. However, no work to date has evaluated whether it is possible to cause changes in cognitive function in a long-term behavioral training study by manipulating expectations. In this study, positive or negative expectations about cognitive training were both explicitly and associatively induced before either a working memory training intervention or a control intervention. Consistent with previous work, a main effect of the training condition was found, with individuals trained on the working memory task showing larger gains in cognitive function than those trained on the control task. Interestingly, a main effect of expectation was also found, with individuals given positive expectations showing larger cognitive gains than those who were given negative expectations (regardless of training condition). No interaction effect between training and expectations was found. Exploratory analyses suggest that certain individual characteristics (e.g., personality, motivation) moderate the size of the expectation effect. These results highlight aspects of methodology that can inform future behavioral interventions and suggest that participant expectations could be capitalized on to maximize training outcomes. National Academy of Sciences 2022-09-06 2022-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9477404/ /pubmed/36067292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2209308119 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Social Sciences
Parong, Jocelyn
Seitz, Aaron R.
Jaeggi, Susanne M.
Green, C. Shawn
Expectation effects in working memory training
title Expectation effects in working memory training
title_full Expectation effects in working memory training
title_fullStr Expectation effects in working memory training
title_full_unstemmed Expectation effects in working memory training
title_short Expectation effects in working memory training
title_sort expectation effects in working memory training
topic Social Sciences
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9477404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36067292
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2209308119
work_keys_str_mv AT parongjocelyn expectationeffectsinworkingmemorytraining
AT seitzaaronr expectationeffectsinworkingmemorytraining
AT jaeggisusannem expectationeffectsinworkingmemorytraining
AT greencshawn expectationeffectsinworkingmemorytraining