Cargando…

Validation of an autonomous artificial intelligence–based diagnostic system for holistic maculopathy screening in a routine occupational health checkup context

PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate the ability of an autonomous artificial intelligence (AI) system for detection of the most common central retinal pathologies in fundus photography. METHODS: Retrospective diagnostic test evaluation on a raw dataset of 5918 images (2839 individuals) evaluated wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Font, Octavi, Torrents-Barrena, Jordina, Royo, Dídac, García, Sandra Banderas, Zarranz-Ventura, Javier, Bures, Anniken, Salinas, Cecilia, Zapata, Miguel Ángel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9477940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35567610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-022-05653-2
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate the ability of an autonomous artificial intelligence (AI) system for detection of the most common central retinal pathologies in fundus photography. METHODS: Retrospective diagnostic test evaluation on a raw dataset of 5918 images (2839 individuals) evaluated with non-mydriatic cameras during routine occupational health checkups. Three camera models were employed: Optomed Aurora (field of view — FOV 50º, 88% of the dataset), ZEISS VISUSCOUT 100 (FOV 40º, 9%), and Optomed SmartScope M5 (FOV 40º, 3%). Image acquisition took 2 min per patient. Ground truth for each image of the dataset was determined by 2 masked retina specialists, and disagreements were resolved by a 3rd retina specialist. The specific pathologies considered for evaluation were “diabetic retinopathy” (DR), “Age-related macular degeneration” (AMD), “glaucomatous optic neuropathy” (GON), and “Nevus.” Images with maculopathy signs that did not match the described taxonomy were classified as “Other.” RESULTS: The combination of algorithms to detect any abnormalities had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.963 with a sensitivity of 92.9% and a specificity of 86.8%. The algorithms individually obtained are as follows: AMD AUC 0.980 (sensitivity 93.8%; specificity 95.7%), DR AUC 0.950 (sensitivity 81.1%; specificity 94.8%), GON AUC 0.889 (sensitivity 53.6% specificity 95.7%), Nevus AUC 0.931 (sensitivity 86.7%; specificity 90.7%). CONCLUSION: Our holistic AI approach reaches high diagnostic accuracy at simultaneous detection of DR, AMD, and Nevus. The integration of pathology-specific algorithms permits higher sensitivities with minimal impact on its specificity. It also reduces the risk of missing incidental findings. Deep learning may facilitate wider screenings of eye diseases.