Cargando…

Pelvic inclination correction system for magnetic resonance imaging analysis of pelvic organ prolapse in upright position

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Pelvic organ prolapse quantification by means of upright magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a promising research field. This study determines the angle for the pelvic inclination correction system (PICS) for upright patient position, which is hypothesized to deviate fro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morsinkhof, Lisan M., Schulten, Martine K., DeLancey, John O. L., Simonis, Frank F. J., Grob, Anique T. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9477951/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35907021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05289-0
_version_ 1784790474789224448
author Morsinkhof, Lisan M.
Schulten, Martine K.
DeLancey, John O. L.
Simonis, Frank F. J.
Grob, Anique T. M.
author_facet Morsinkhof, Lisan M.
Schulten, Martine K.
DeLancey, John O. L.
Simonis, Frank F. J.
Grob, Anique T. M.
author_sort Morsinkhof, Lisan M.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Pelvic organ prolapse quantification by means of upright magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a promising research field. This study determines the angle for the pelvic inclination correction system (PICS) for upright patient position, which is hypothesized to deviate from the supine PICS angle. The necessity of different PICS angles for various patient positions will also be discussed. METHODS: Magnetic resonance scans of 113 women, acquired in an upright patient position, were used to determine the upright PICS angle, defined as the angle between the sacrococcygeal–inferior pubic point (SCIPP) line and the horizontal line. The difference and correlation between the upright and supine PICS angles were calculated using the paired Student’s t-test and the Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) respectively. The effect of the difference between the upright and supine PICS angle on the measured pelvic organ extent was calculated using goniometry. RESULTS: The mean (interquartile range) PICS angles were 29° (26–35°) for the upright and 33° (30–37°) for the supine patient position. They were significantly different (p<0.001) and very strongly correlated (r = 0.914, p<0.001). The 4° difference between the average upright and supine PICS angle results in an average underestimation of the measured cervix height of approximately 0.5 cm for patients scanned in upright position. CONCLUSIONS: The PICS angle for the upright patient position is 29°. The use of a dedicated PICS angle for different patient positions allows for more accurate pelvic organ extent analysis in patients with prolapse.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9477951
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94779512022-09-17 Pelvic inclination correction system for magnetic resonance imaging analysis of pelvic organ prolapse in upright position Morsinkhof, Lisan M. Schulten, Martine K. DeLancey, John O. L. Simonis, Frank F. J. Grob, Anique T. M. Int Urogynecol J Original Article INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Pelvic organ prolapse quantification by means of upright magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a promising research field. This study determines the angle for the pelvic inclination correction system (PICS) for upright patient position, which is hypothesized to deviate from the supine PICS angle. The necessity of different PICS angles for various patient positions will also be discussed. METHODS: Magnetic resonance scans of 113 women, acquired in an upright patient position, were used to determine the upright PICS angle, defined as the angle between the sacrococcygeal–inferior pubic point (SCIPP) line and the horizontal line. The difference and correlation between the upright and supine PICS angles were calculated using the paired Student’s t-test and the Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) respectively. The effect of the difference between the upright and supine PICS angle on the measured pelvic organ extent was calculated using goniometry. RESULTS: The mean (interquartile range) PICS angles were 29° (26–35°) for the upright and 33° (30–37°) for the supine patient position. They were significantly different (p<0.001) and very strongly correlated (r = 0.914, p<0.001). The 4° difference between the average upright and supine PICS angle results in an average underestimation of the measured cervix height of approximately 0.5 cm for patients scanned in upright position. CONCLUSIONS: The PICS angle for the upright patient position is 29°. The use of a dedicated PICS angle for different patient positions allows for more accurate pelvic organ extent analysis in patients with prolapse. Springer International Publishing 2022-07-30 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9477951/ /pubmed/35907021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05289-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Morsinkhof, Lisan M.
Schulten, Martine K.
DeLancey, John O. L.
Simonis, Frank F. J.
Grob, Anique T. M.
Pelvic inclination correction system for magnetic resonance imaging analysis of pelvic organ prolapse in upright position
title Pelvic inclination correction system for magnetic resonance imaging analysis of pelvic organ prolapse in upright position
title_full Pelvic inclination correction system for magnetic resonance imaging analysis of pelvic organ prolapse in upright position
title_fullStr Pelvic inclination correction system for magnetic resonance imaging analysis of pelvic organ prolapse in upright position
title_full_unstemmed Pelvic inclination correction system for magnetic resonance imaging analysis of pelvic organ prolapse in upright position
title_short Pelvic inclination correction system for magnetic resonance imaging analysis of pelvic organ prolapse in upright position
title_sort pelvic inclination correction system for magnetic resonance imaging analysis of pelvic organ prolapse in upright position
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9477951/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35907021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05289-0
work_keys_str_mv AT morsinkhoflisanm pelvicinclinationcorrectionsystemformagneticresonanceimaginganalysisofpelvicorganprolapseinuprightposition
AT schultenmartinek pelvicinclinationcorrectionsystemformagneticresonanceimaginganalysisofpelvicorganprolapseinuprightposition
AT delanceyjohnol pelvicinclinationcorrectionsystemformagneticresonanceimaginganalysisofpelvicorganprolapseinuprightposition
AT simonisfrankfj pelvicinclinationcorrectionsystemformagneticresonanceimaginganalysisofpelvicorganprolapseinuprightposition
AT grobaniquetm pelvicinclinationcorrectionsystemformagneticresonanceimaginganalysisofpelvicorganprolapseinuprightposition