Cargando…

A scoring system developed from a nomogram to differentiate active pulmonary tuberculosis from inactive pulmonary tuberculosis

PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop and validate a scoring system based on a nomogram of common clinical metrics to discriminate between active pulmonary tuberculosis (APTB) and inactive pulmonary tuberculosis (IPTB). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1096 patients with pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yu, Qi, Yan, Jisong, Tian, Shan, Weng, Wujin, Luo, Hong, Wei, Gang, Long, Gangyu, Ma, Jun, Gong, Fengyun, Wang, Xiaorong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9478038/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36118035
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2022.947954
_version_ 1784790487408836608
author Yu, Qi
Yan, Jisong
Tian, Shan
Weng, Wujin
Luo, Hong
Wei, Gang
Long, Gangyu
Ma, Jun
Gong, Fengyun
Wang, Xiaorong
author_facet Yu, Qi
Yan, Jisong
Tian, Shan
Weng, Wujin
Luo, Hong
Wei, Gang
Long, Gangyu
Ma, Jun
Gong, Fengyun
Wang, Xiaorong
author_sort Yu, Qi
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop and validate a scoring system based on a nomogram of common clinical metrics to discriminate between active pulmonary tuberculosis (APTB) and inactive pulmonary tuberculosis (IPTB). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1096 patients with pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) admitted to Wuhan Jinyintan Hospital between January 2017 and December 2019 were included in this study. Of these patients with PTB, 744 were included in the training cohort (70%; 458 patients with APTB, and 286 patients with IPTB), and 352 were included in the validation cohort (30%; 220 patients with APTB, and 132 patients with IPTB). Data from 744 patients from the training cohort were used to establish the diagnostic model. Routine blood examination indices and biochemical indicators were collected to construct a diagnostic model using the nomogram, which was then transformed into a scoring system. Furthermore, data from 352 patients from the validation cohort were used to validate the scoring system. RESULTS: Six variables were selected to construct the prediction model. In the scoring system, the mean corpuscular volume, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, albumin level, adenosine deaminase level, monocyte-to-high-density lipoprotein ratio, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein-to-lymphocyte ratio were 6, 4, 7, 5, 5, and 10, respectively. When the cut-off value was 15.5, the scoring system for recognizing APTB and IPTB exhibited excellent diagnostic performance. The area under the curve, specificity, and sensitivity of the training cohort were 0.919, 84.06%, and 86.36%, respectively, whereas those of the validation cohort were 0.900, 82.73, and 86.36%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study successfully constructed a scoring system for distinguishing APTB from IPTB that performed well.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9478038
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94780382022-09-17 A scoring system developed from a nomogram to differentiate active pulmonary tuberculosis from inactive pulmonary tuberculosis Yu, Qi Yan, Jisong Tian, Shan Weng, Wujin Luo, Hong Wei, Gang Long, Gangyu Ma, Jun Gong, Fengyun Wang, Xiaorong Front Cell Infect Microbiol Cellular and Infection Microbiology PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop and validate a scoring system based on a nomogram of common clinical metrics to discriminate between active pulmonary tuberculosis (APTB) and inactive pulmonary tuberculosis (IPTB). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1096 patients with pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) admitted to Wuhan Jinyintan Hospital between January 2017 and December 2019 were included in this study. Of these patients with PTB, 744 were included in the training cohort (70%; 458 patients with APTB, and 286 patients with IPTB), and 352 were included in the validation cohort (30%; 220 patients with APTB, and 132 patients with IPTB). Data from 744 patients from the training cohort were used to establish the diagnostic model. Routine blood examination indices and biochemical indicators were collected to construct a diagnostic model using the nomogram, which was then transformed into a scoring system. Furthermore, data from 352 patients from the validation cohort were used to validate the scoring system. RESULTS: Six variables were selected to construct the prediction model. In the scoring system, the mean corpuscular volume, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, albumin level, adenosine deaminase level, monocyte-to-high-density lipoprotein ratio, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein-to-lymphocyte ratio were 6, 4, 7, 5, 5, and 10, respectively. When the cut-off value was 15.5, the scoring system for recognizing APTB and IPTB exhibited excellent diagnostic performance. The area under the curve, specificity, and sensitivity of the training cohort were 0.919, 84.06%, and 86.36%, respectively, whereas those of the validation cohort were 0.900, 82.73, and 86.36%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study successfully constructed a scoring system for distinguishing APTB from IPTB that performed well. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9478038/ /pubmed/36118035 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2022.947954 Text en Copyright © 2022 Yu, Yan, Tian, Weng, Luo, Wei, Long, Ma, Gong and Wang https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cellular and Infection Microbiology
Yu, Qi
Yan, Jisong
Tian, Shan
Weng, Wujin
Luo, Hong
Wei, Gang
Long, Gangyu
Ma, Jun
Gong, Fengyun
Wang, Xiaorong
A scoring system developed from a nomogram to differentiate active pulmonary tuberculosis from inactive pulmonary tuberculosis
title A scoring system developed from a nomogram to differentiate active pulmonary tuberculosis from inactive pulmonary tuberculosis
title_full A scoring system developed from a nomogram to differentiate active pulmonary tuberculosis from inactive pulmonary tuberculosis
title_fullStr A scoring system developed from a nomogram to differentiate active pulmonary tuberculosis from inactive pulmonary tuberculosis
title_full_unstemmed A scoring system developed from a nomogram to differentiate active pulmonary tuberculosis from inactive pulmonary tuberculosis
title_short A scoring system developed from a nomogram to differentiate active pulmonary tuberculosis from inactive pulmonary tuberculosis
title_sort scoring system developed from a nomogram to differentiate active pulmonary tuberculosis from inactive pulmonary tuberculosis
topic Cellular and Infection Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9478038/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36118035
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2022.947954
work_keys_str_mv AT yuqi ascoringsystemdevelopedfromanomogramtodifferentiateactivepulmonarytuberculosisfrominactivepulmonarytuberculosis
AT yanjisong ascoringsystemdevelopedfromanomogramtodifferentiateactivepulmonarytuberculosisfrominactivepulmonarytuberculosis
AT tianshan ascoringsystemdevelopedfromanomogramtodifferentiateactivepulmonarytuberculosisfrominactivepulmonarytuberculosis
AT wengwujin ascoringsystemdevelopedfromanomogramtodifferentiateactivepulmonarytuberculosisfrominactivepulmonarytuberculosis
AT luohong ascoringsystemdevelopedfromanomogramtodifferentiateactivepulmonarytuberculosisfrominactivepulmonarytuberculosis
AT weigang ascoringsystemdevelopedfromanomogramtodifferentiateactivepulmonarytuberculosisfrominactivepulmonarytuberculosis
AT longgangyu ascoringsystemdevelopedfromanomogramtodifferentiateactivepulmonarytuberculosisfrominactivepulmonarytuberculosis
AT majun ascoringsystemdevelopedfromanomogramtodifferentiateactivepulmonarytuberculosisfrominactivepulmonarytuberculosis
AT gongfengyun ascoringsystemdevelopedfromanomogramtodifferentiateactivepulmonarytuberculosisfrominactivepulmonarytuberculosis
AT wangxiaorong ascoringsystemdevelopedfromanomogramtodifferentiateactivepulmonarytuberculosisfrominactivepulmonarytuberculosis
AT yuqi scoringsystemdevelopedfromanomogramtodifferentiateactivepulmonarytuberculosisfrominactivepulmonarytuberculosis
AT yanjisong scoringsystemdevelopedfromanomogramtodifferentiateactivepulmonarytuberculosisfrominactivepulmonarytuberculosis
AT tianshan scoringsystemdevelopedfromanomogramtodifferentiateactivepulmonarytuberculosisfrominactivepulmonarytuberculosis
AT wengwujin scoringsystemdevelopedfromanomogramtodifferentiateactivepulmonarytuberculosisfrominactivepulmonarytuberculosis
AT luohong scoringsystemdevelopedfromanomogramtodifferentiateactivepulmonarytuberculosisfrominactivepulmonarytuberculosis
AT weigang scoringsystemdevelopedfromanomogramtodifferentiateactivepulmonarytuberculosisfrominactivepulmonarytuberculosis
AT longgangyu scoringsystemdevelopedfromanomogramtodifferentiateactivepulmonarytuberculosisfrominactivepulmonarytuberculosis
AT majun scoringsystemdevelopedfromanomogramtodifferentiateactivepulmonarytuberculosisfrominactivepulmonarytuberculosis
AT gongfengyun scoringsystemdevelopedfromanomogramtodifferentiateactivepulmonarytuberculosisfrominactivepulmonarytuberculosis
AT wangxiaorong scoringsystemdevelopedfromanomogramtodifferentiateactivepulmonarytuberculosisfrominactivepulmonarytuberculosis