Cargando…
A scoring system developed from a nomogram to differentiate active pulmonary tuberculosis from inactive pulmonary tuberculosis
PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop and validate a scoring system based on a nomogram of common clinical metrics to discriminate between active pulmonary tuberculosis (APTB) and inactive pulmonary tuberculosis (IPTB). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1096 patients with pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9478038/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36118035 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2022.947954 |
_version_ | 1784790487408836608 |
---|---|
author | Yu, Qi Yan, Jisong Tian, Shan Weng, Wujin Luo, Hong Wei, Gang Long, Gangyu Ma, Jun Gong, Fengyun Wang, Xiaorong |
author_facet | Yu, Qi Yan, Jisong Tian, Shan Weng, Wujin Luo, Hong Wei, Gang Long, Gangyu Ma, Jun Gong, Fengyun Wang, Xiaorong |
author_sort | Yu, Qi |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop and validate a scoring system based on a nomogram of common clinical metrics to discriminate between active pulmonary tuberculosis (APTB) and inactive pulmonary tuberculosis (IPTB). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1096 patients with pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) admitted to Wuhan Jinyintan Hospital between January 2017 and December 2019 were included in this study. Of these patients with PTB, 744 were included in the training cohort (70%; 458 patients with APTB, and 286 patients with IPTB), and 352 were included in the validation cohort (30%; 220 patients with APTB, and 132 patients with IPTB). Data from 744 patients from the training cohort were used to establish the diagnostic model. Routine blood examination indices and biochemical indicators were collected to construct a diagnostic model using the nomogram, which was then transformed into a scoring system. Furthermore, data from 352 patients from the validation cohort were used to validate the scoring system. RESULTS: Six variables were selected to construct the prediction model. In the scoring system, the mean corpuscular volume, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, albumin level, adenosine deaminase level, monocyte-to-high-density lipoprotein ratio, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein-to-lymphocyte ratio were 6, 4, 7, 5, 5, and 10, respectively. When the cut-off value was 15.5, the scoring system for recognizing APTB and IPTB exhibited excellent diagnostic performance. The area under the curve, specificity, and sensitivity of the training cohort were 0.919, 84.06%, and 86.36%, respectively, whereas those of the validation cohort were 0.900, 82.73, and 86.36%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study successfully constructed a scoring system for distinguishing APTB from IPTB that performed well. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9478038 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94780382022-09-17 A scoring system developed from a nomogram to differentiate active pulmonary tuberculosis from inactive pulmonary tuberculosis Yu, Qi Yan, Jisong Tian, Shan Weng, Wujin Luo, Hong Wei, Gang Long, Gangyu Ma, Jun Gong, Fengyun Wang, Xiaorong Front Cell Infect Microbiol Cellular and Infection Microbiology PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop and validate a scoring system based on a nomogram of common clinical metrics to discriminate between active pulmonary tuberculosis (APTB) and inactive pulmonary tuberculosis (IPTB). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1096 patients with pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) admitted to Wuhan Jinyintan Hospital between January 2017 and December 2019 were included in this study. Of these patients with PTB, 744 were included in the training cohort (70%; 458 patients with APTB, and 286 patients with IPTB), and 352 were included in the validation cohort (30%; 220 patients with APTB, and 132 patients with IPTB). Data from 744 patients from the training cohort were used to establish the diagnostic model. Routine blood examination indices and biochemical indicators were collected to construct a diagnostic model using the nomogram, which was then transformed into a scoring system. Furthermore, data from 352 patients from the validation cohort were used to validate the scoring system. RESULTS: Six variables were selected to construct the prediction model. In the scoring system, the mean corpuscular volume, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, albumin level, adenosine deaminase level, monocyte-to-high-density lipoprotein ratio, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein-to-lymphocyte ratio were 6, 4, 7, 5, 5, and 10, respectively. When the cut-off value was 15.5, the scoring system for recognizing APTB and IPTB exhibited excellent diagnostic performance. The area under the curve, specificity, and sensitivity of the training cohort were 0.919, 84.06%, and 86.36%, respectively, whereas those of the validation cohort were 0.900, 82.73, and 86.36%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study successfully constructed a scoring system for distinguishing APTB from IPTB that performed well. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9478038/ /pubmed/36118035 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2022.947954 Text en Copyright © 2022 Yu, Yan, Tian, Weng, Luo, Wei, Long, Ma, Gong and Wang https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Cellular and Infection Microbiology Yu, Qi Yan, Jisong Tian, Shan Weng, Wujin Luo, Hong Wei, Gang Long, Gangyu Ma, Jun Gong, Fengyun Wang, Xiaorong A scoring system developed from a nomogram to differentiate active pulmonary tuberculosis from inactive pulmonary tuberculosis |
title | A scoring system developed from a nomogram to differentiate active pulmonary tuberculosis from inactive pulmonary tuberculosis |
title_full | A scoring system developed from a nomogram to differentiate active pulmonary tuberculosis from inactive pulmonary tuberculosis |
title_fullStr | A scoring system developed from a nomogram to differentiate active pulmonary tuberculosis from inactive pulmonary tuberculosis |
title_full_unstemmed | A scoring system developed from a nomogram to differentiate active pulmonary tuberculosis from inactive pulmonary tuberculosis |
title_short | A scoring system developed from a nomogram to differentiate active pulmonary tuberculosis from inactive pulmonary tuberculosis |
title_sort | scoring system developed from a nomogram to differentiate active pulmonary tuberculosis from inactive pulmonary tuberculosis |
topic | Cellular and Infection Microbiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9478038/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36118035 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2022.947954 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yuqi ascoringsystemdevelopedfromanomogramtodifferentiateactivepulmonarytuberculosisfrominactivepulmonarytuberculosis AT yanjisong ascoringsystemdevelopedfromanomogramtodifferentiateactivepulmonarytuberculosisfrominactivepulmonarytuberculosis AT tianshan ascoringsystemdevelopedfromanomogramtodifferentiateactivepulmonarytuberculosisfrominactivepulmonarytuberculosis AT wengwujin ascoringsystemdevelopedfromanomogramtodifferentiateactivepulmonarytuberculosisfrominactivepulmonarytuberculosis AT luohong ascoringsystemdevelopedfromanomogramtodifferentiateactivepulmonarytuberculosisfrominactivepulmonarytuberculosis AT weigang ascoringsystemdevelopedfromanomogramtodifferentiateactivepulmonarytuberculosisfrominactivepulmonarytuberculosis AT longgangyu ascoringsystemdevelopedfromanomogramtodifferentiateactivepulmonarytuberculosisfrominactivepulmonarytuberculosis AT majun ascoringsystemdevelopedfromanomogramtodifferentiateactivepulmonarytuberculosisfrominactivepulmonarytuberculosis AT gongfengyun ascoringsystemdevelopedfromanomogramtodifferentiateactivepulmonarytuberculosisfrominactivepulmonarytuberculosis AT wangxiaorong ascoringsystemdevelopedfromanomogramtodifferentiateactivepulmonarytuberculosisfrominactivepulmonarytuberculosis AT yuqi scoringsystemdevelopedfromanomogramtodifferentiateactivepulmonarytuberculosisfrominactivepulmonarytuberculosis AT yanjisong scoringsystemdevelopedfromanomogramtodifferentiateactivepulmonarytuberculosisfrominactivepulmonarytuberculosis AT tianshan scoringsystemdevelopedfromanomogramtodifferentiateactivepulmonarytuberculosisfrominactivepulmonarytuberculosis AT wengwujin scoringsystemdevelopedfromanomogramtodifferentiateactivepulmonarytuberculosisfrominactivepulmonarytuberculosis AT luohong scoringsystemdevelopedfromanomogramtodifferentiateactivepulmonarytuberculosisfrominactivepulmonarytuberculosis AT weigang scoringsystemdevelopedfromanomogramtodifferentiateactivepulmonarytuberculosisfrominactivepulmonarytuberculosis AT longgangyu scoringsystemdevelopedfromanomogramtodifferentiateactivepulmonarytuberculosisfrominactivepulmonarytuberculosis AT majun scoringsystemdevelopedfromanomogramtodifferentiateactivepulmonarytuberculosisfrominactivepulmonarytuberculosis AT gongfengyun scoringsystemdevelopedfromanomogramtodifferentiateactivepulmonarytuberculosisfrominactivepulmonarytuberculosis AT wangxiaorong scoringsystemdevelopedfromanomogramtodifferentiateactivepulmonarytuberculosisfrominactivepulmonarytuberculosis |