Cargando…

Comparison of endoscopic submucosal resection with ligation and endoscopic submucosal dissection for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors: A multicenter retrospective study

OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic submucosal resection with band ligation (ESMR‐L) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are both standard endoscopic resection methods for rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) <10 mm in size. However, there is no definitive consensus on which is better. Here, we compared...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matsuno, Kenshi, Miyamoto, Hideaki, Kitada, Hideki, Yoshimatsu, Shinichi, Tamura, Fumio, Sakurai, Kouichi, Fukubayashi, Kotaro, Shono, Takashi, Setoyama, Hiroko, Matsuyama, Taichi, Suko, Shinichiro, Narita, Rei, Honda, Munenori, Tateyama, Masakuni, Naoe, Hideaki, Morinaga, Jun, Tanaka, Yasuhito, Gushima, Ryosuke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9478042/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36176350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/deo2.163
_version_ 1784790488428052480
author Matsuno, Kenshi
Miyamoto, Hideaki
Kitada, Hideki
Yoshimatsu, Shinichi
Tamura, Fumio
Sakurai, Kouichi
Fukubayashi, Kotaro
Shono, Takashi
Setoyama, Hiroko
Matsuyama, Taichi
Suko, Shinichiro
Narita, Rei
Honda, Munenori
Tateyama, Masakuni
Naoe, Hideaki
Morinaga, Jun
Tanaka, Yasuhito
Gushima, Ryosuke
author_facet Matsuno, Kenshi
Miyamoto, Hideaki
Kitada, Hideki
Yoshimatsu, Shinichi
Tamura, Fumio
Sakurai, Kouichi
Fukubayashi, Kotaro
Shono, Takashi
Setoyama, Hiroko
Matsuyama, Taichi
Suko, Shinichiro
Narita, Rei
Honda, Munenori
Tateyama, Masakuni
Naoe, Hideaki
Morinaga, Jun
Tanaka, Yasuhito
Gushima, Ryosuke
author_sort Matsuno, Kenshi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic submucosal resection with band ligation (ESMR‐L) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are both standard endoscopic resection methods for rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) <10 mm in size. However, there is no definitive consensus on which is better. Here, we compared the efficacy of ESMR‐L and ESD for small rectal NETs. METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study including 205 patients with rectal NETs who underwent ESMR‐L or ESD. Treatment outcomes were compared by univariate analysis, multivariate analysis, and inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) using propensity scores. Subgroup analysis evaluated the impact of the endoscopist's experience on the technical outcome. RESULTS: Eighty‐nine patients were treated by ESMR‐L and 116 by ESD. The R0 resection rate was not significantly different between the two (90% vs. 92%, p = 0.73). The procedure time of ESMR‐L was significantly shorter than for ESD (17 min vs. 52 min, p < 0.01) and the hospitalization period was also significantly shorter (3 days vs. 5 days, p < 0.01). These results were confirmed by multivariate analysis and also after IPTW adjustment. The procedure time of ESD was significantly prolonged by a less‐experienced endoscopist (49 min vs. 70 min, p = 0.02), but that of ESMR‐L was not affected (17 min vs. 17 min, p = 0.27). CONCLUSIONS: For small rectal NETs, both ESMR‐L and ESD showed similar high complete resection rates. However, considering the shorter procedure time and shorter hospitalization period, ESMR‐L is the more efficient treatment method, especially for less‐experienced endoscopists.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9478042
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94780422022-09-28 Comparison of endoscopic submucosal resection with ligation and endoscopic submucosal dissection for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors: A multicenter retrospective study Matsuno, Kenshi Miyamoto, Hideaki Kitada, Hideki Yoshimatsu, Shinichi Tamura, Fumio Sakurai, Kouichi Fukubayashi, Kotaro Shono, Takashi Setoyama, Hiroko Matsuyama, Taichi Suko, Shinichiro Narita, Rei Honda, Munenori Tateyama, Masakuni Naoe, Hideaki Morinaga, Jun Tanaka, Yasuhito Gushima, Ryosuke DEN Open Original Articles OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic submucosal resection with band ligation (ESMR‐L) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are both standard endoscopic resection methods for rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) <10 mm in size. However, there is no definitive consensus on which is better. Here, we compared the efficacy of ESMR‐L and ESD for small rectal NETs. METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study including 205 patients with rectal NETs who underwent ESMR‐L or ESD. Treatment outcomes were compared by univariate analysis, multivariate analysis, and inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) using propensity scores. Subgroup analysis evaluated the impact of the endoscopist's experience on the technical outcome. RESULTS: Eighty‐nine patients were treated by ESMR‐L and 116 by ESD. The R0 resection rate was not significantly different between the two (90% vs. 92%, p = 0.73). The procedure time of ESMR‐L was significantly shorter than for ESD (17 min vs. 52 min, p < 0.01) and the hospitalization period was also significantly shorter (3 days vs. 5 days, p < 0.01). These results were confirmed by multivariate analysis and also after IPTW adjustment. The procedure time of ESD was significantly prolonged by a less‐experienced endoscopist (49 min vs. 70 min, p = 0.02), but that of ESMR‐L was not affected (17 min vs. 17 min, p = 0.27). CONCLUSIONS: For small rectal NETs, both ESMR‐L and ESD showed similar high complete resection rates. However, considering the shorter procedure time and shorter hospitalization period, ESMR‐L is the more efficient treatment method, especially for less‐experienced endoscopists. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9478042/ /pubmed/36176350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/deo2.163 Text en © 2022 The Authors. DEN Open published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Matsuno, Kenshi
Miyamoto, Hideaki
Kitada, Hideki
Yoshimatsu, Shinichi
Tamura, Fumio
Sakurai, Kouichi
Fukubayashi, Kotaro
Shono, Takashi
Setoyama, Hiroko
Matsuyama, Taichi
Suko, Shinichiro
Narita, Rei
Honda, Munenori
Tateyama, Masakuni
Naoe, Hideaki
Morinaga, Jun
Tanaka, Yasuhito
Gushima, Ryosuke
Comparison of endoscopic submucosal resection with ligation and endoscopic submucosal dissection for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors: A multicenter retrospective study
title Comparison of endoscopic submucosal resection with ligation and endoscopic submucosal dissection for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors: A multicenter retrospective study
title_full Comparison of endoscopic submucosal resection with ligation and endoscopic submucosal dissection for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors: A multicenter retrospective study
title_fullStr Comparison of endoscopic submucosal resection with ligation and endoscopic submucosal dissection for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors: A multicenter retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of endoscopic submucosal resection with ligation and endoscopic submucosal dissection for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors: A multicenter retrospective study
title_short Comparison of endoscopic submucosal resection with ligation and endoscopic submucosal dissection for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors: A multicenter retrospective study
title_sort comparison of endoscopic submucosal resection with ligation and endoscopic submucosal dissection for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors: a multicenter retrospective study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9478042/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36176350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/deo2.163
work_keys_str_mv AT matsunokenshi comparisonofendoscopicsubmucosalresectionwithligationandendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforsmallrectalneuroendocrinetumorsamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT miyamotohideaki comparisonofendoscopicsubmucosalresectionwithligationandendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforsmallrectalneuroendocrinetumorsamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT kitadahideki comparisonofendoscopicsubmucosalresectionwithligationandendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforsmallrectalneuroendocrinetumorsamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT yoshimatsushinichi comparisonofendoscopicsubmucosalresectionwithligationandendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforsmallrectalneuroendocrinetumorsamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT tamurafumio comparisonofendoscopicsubmucosalresectionwithligationandendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforsmallrectalneuroendocrinetumorsamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT sakuraikouichi comparisonofendoscopicsubmucosalresectionwithligationandendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforsmallrectalneuroendocrinetumorsamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT fukubayashikotaro comparisonofendoscopicsubmucosalresectionwithligationandendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforsmallrectalneuroendocrinetumorsamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT shonotakashi comparisonofendoscopicsubmucosalresectionwithligationandendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforsmallrectalneuroendocrinetumorsamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT setoyamahiroko comparisonofendoscopicsubmucosalresectionwithligationandendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforsmallrectalneuroendocrinetumorsamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT matsuyamataichi comparisonofendoscopicsubmucosalresectionwithligationandendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforsmallrectalneuroendocrinetumorsamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT sukoshinichiro comparisonofendoscopicsubmucosalresectionwithligationandendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforsmallrectalneuroendocrinetumorsamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT naritarei comparisonofendoscopicsubmucosalresectionwithligationandendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforsmallrectalneuroendocrinetumorsamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT hondamunenori comparisonofendoscopicsubmucosalresectionwithligationandendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforsmallrectalneuroendocrinetumorsamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT tateyamamasakuni comparisonofendoscopicsubmucosalresectionwithligationandendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforsmallrectalneuroendocrinetumorsamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT naoehideaki comparisonofendoscopicsubmucosalresectionwithligationandendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforsmallrectalneuroendocrinetumorsamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT morinagajun comparisonofendoscopicsubmucosalresectionwithligationandendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforsmallrectalneuroendocrinetumorsamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT tanakayasuhito comparisonofendoscopicsubmucosalresectionwithligationandendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforsmallrectalneuroendocrinetumorsamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT gushimaryosuke comparisonofendoscopicsubmucosalresectionwithligationandendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforsmallrectalneuroendocrinetumorsamulticenterretrospectivestudy