Cargando…
Is a high-risk clinical target volume required? Evaluation of the dosimetric feasibility based on T staging
BACKGROUND: Clinical target delineation is a primary focus in the field of radiotherapy. This study aimed to investigate whether high-risk clinical target volume can be removed in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with different T stages. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We designed a test plan without the hi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9478172/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36119501 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.800400 |
_version_ | 1784790509005307904 |
---|---|
author | Yuan, Xingxing Yan, Chao Peng, Shiyi Chen, Zhiping Lu, Tianzhu Gong, Qiaoying Qiu, Yang Xiong, Wenming Ao, Fenghua Li, Guoqing Li, Jingao Tu, Ziwei |
author_facet | Yuan, Xingxing Yan, Chao Peng, Shiyi Chen, Zhiping Lu, Tianzhu Gong, Qiaoying Qiu, Yang Xiong, Wenming Ao, Fenghua Li, Guoqing Li, Jingao Tu, Ziwei |
author_sort | Yuan, Xingxing |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Clinical target delineation is a primary focus in the field of radiotherapy. This study aimed to investigate whether high-risk clinical target volume can be removed in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with different T stages. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We designed a test plan without the high-risk clinical target volume for 111 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients and further compared the test plans with the treatment plans in the parameters of planning target volumes and the radiation dose to normal organs. RESULTS: Our data showed that when high-risk clinical target volume was abnegated, target coverage, conformity indices, and homogeneity indices of planning target volumes and doses of normal organs were not influenced in the T4 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients, and more than 95% of the high-risk planning target volume area could still be covered by the 60 Gy dose line. However, only some T1–3 patients achieved the ideal dose coverage, and even fewer after induction chemotherapy (62.8% vs. 41.2%, p = 0.018). Gross tumor volume was positively correlated with the target coverage of the original high-risk planning target volume in the test-plan (p = 0.0001). Gross tumor volume can be used to predict whether the target coverage of high-risk planning target volume is more than 95% (area under the curve = 0.868). CONCLUSION: Omitting high risk clinical target volume can be considered in patients with T4 nasopharyngeal carcinoma according to physical evaluations. However, this approach is only suitable for a specific subset of T1–3 patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9478172 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94781722022-09-17 Is a high-risk clinical target volume required? Evaluation of the dosimetric feasibility based on T staging Yuan, Xingxing Yan, Chao Peng, Shiyi Chen, Zhiping Lu, Tianzhu Gong, Qiaoying Qiu, Yang Xiong, Wenming Ao, Fenghua Li, Guoqing Li, Jingao Tu, Ziwei Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: Clinical target delineation is a primary focus in the field of radiotherapy. This study aimed to investigate whether high-risk clinical target volume can be removed in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with different T stages. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We designed a test plan without the high-risk clinical target volume for 111 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients and further compared the test plans with the treatment plans in the parameters of planning target volumes and the radiation dose to normal organs. RESULTS: Our data showed that when high-risk clinical target volume was abnegated, target coverage, conformity indices, and homogeneity indices of planning target volumes and doses of normal organs were not influenced in the T4 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients, and more than 95% of the high-risk planning target volume area could still be covered by the 60 Gy dose line. However, only some T1–3 patients achieved the ideal dose coverage, and even fewer after induction chemotherapy (62.8% vs. 41.2%, p = 0.018). Gross tumor volume was positively correlated with the target coverage of the original high-risk planning target volume in the test-plan (p = 0.0001). Gross tumor volume can be used to predict whether the target coverage of high-risk planning target volume is more than 95% (area under the curve = 0.868). CONCLUSION: Omitting high risk clinical target volume can be considered in patients with T4 nasopharyngeal carcinoma according to physical evaluations. However, this approach is only suitable for a specific subset of T1–3 patients. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9478172/ /pubmed/36119501 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.800400 Text en Copyright © 2022 Yuan, Yan, Peng, Chen, Lu, Gong, Qiu, Xiong, Ao, Li, Li and Tu https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Yuan, Xingxing Yan, Chao Peng, Shiyi Chen, Zhiping Lu, Tianzhu Gong, Qiaoying Qiu, Yang Xiong, Wenming Ao, Fenghua Li, Guoqing Li, Jingao Tu, Ziwei Is a high-risk clinical target volume required? Evaluation of the dosimetric feasibility based on T staging |
title | Is a high-risk clinical target volume required? Evaluation of the dosimetric feasibility based on T staging |
title_full | Is a high-risk clinical target volume required? Evaluation of the dosimetric feasibility based on T staging |
title_fullStr | Is a high-risk clinical target volume required? Evaluation of the dosimetric feasibility based on T staging |
title_full_unstemmed | Is a high-risk clinical target volume required? Evaluation of the dosimetric feasibility based on T staging |
title_short | Is a high-risk clinical target volume required? Evaluation of the dosimetric feasibility based on T staging |
title_sort | is a high-risk clinical target volume required? evaluation of the dosimetric feasibility based on t staging |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9478172/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36119501 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.800400 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yuanxingxing isahighriskclinicaltargetvolumerequiredevaluationofthedosimetricfeasibilitybasedontstaging AT yanchao isahighriskclinicaltargetvolumerequiredevaluationofthedosimetricfeasibilitybasedontstaging AT pengshiyi isahighriskclinicaltargetvolumerequiredevaluationofthedosimetricfeasibilitybasedontstaging AT chenzhiping isahighriskclinicaltargetvolumerequiredevaluationofthedosimetricfeasibilitybasedontstaging AT lutianzhu isahighriskclinicaltargetvolumerequiredevaluationofthedosimetricfeasibilitybasedontstaging AT gongqiaoying isahighriskclinicaltargetvolumerequiredevaluationofthedosimetricfeasibilitybasedontstaging AT qiuyang isahighriskclinicaltargetvolumerequiredevaluationofthedosimetricfeasibilitybasedontstaging AT xiongwenming isahighriskclinicaltargetvolumerequiredevaluationofthedosimetricfeasibilitybasedontstaging AT aofenghua isahighriskclinicaltargetvolumerequiredevaluationofthedosimetricfeasibilitybasedontstaging AT liguoqing isahighriskclinicaltargetvolumerequiredevaluationofthedosimetricfeasibilitybasedontstaging AT lijingao isahighriskclinicaltargetvolumerequiredevaluationofthedosimetricfeasibilitybasedontstaging AT tuziwei isahighriskclinicaltargetvolumerequiredevaluationofthedosimetricfeasibilitybasedontstaging |