Cargando…

Detection of Sacral Fractures on Radiographs Using Artificial Intelligence

Sacral fractures are often difficult to diagnose on radiographs. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can improve the detection rate but cannot always be performed. The accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) in detecting orthopaedic fractures is now comparable with that of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Inagaki, Naoya, Nakata, Norio, Ichimori, Sina, Udaka, Jun, Mandai, Ayano, Saito, Mitsuru
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9478257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36128254
http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.22.00030
_version_ 1784790529380188160
author Inagaki, Naoya
Nakata, Norio
Ichimori, Sina
Udaka, Jun
Mandai, Ayano
Saito, Mitsuru
author_facet Inagaki, Naoya
Nakata, Norio
Ichimori, Sina
Udaka, Jun
Mandai, Ayano
Saito, Mitsuru
author_sort Inagaki, Naoya
collection PubMed
description Sacral fractures are often difficult to diagnose on radiographs. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can improve the detection rate but cannot always be performed. The accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) in detecting orthopaedic fractures is now comparable with that of orthopaedic specialists. However, the ability of AI to detect sacral fractures has not been investigated, to our knowledge. We hypothesized that the ability to detect sacral fractures on radiographs could be improved by using AI, and aimed to develop an AI model to detect sacral fractures accurately on radiographs with better accuracy than that of orthopaedic surgeons. METHODS: Subjects were patients with suspected pelvic fractures for whom radiographs and CT scans had been obtained. The radiographs were labeled according to sacral fracture status based on CT results. The data set was divided into a training set (2,038 images) and a test set (200 images). Eight convolutional neural network (CNN) models were trained using the training set. Post-trained models were used to evaluate their discrimination ability. The detection ability of 4 experienced orthopaedic surgeons was also measured using the same test set. The results of fracture assessment by the orthopaedic surgeons were compared with those of the 3 CNNs with the greatest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: Among the 8 trained models, the highest areas under the curve were for InceptionV3 (0.989), Xception (0.987), and Inception ResNetV2 (0.984). The detection rate was significantly higher for these 3 CNNs than for the orthopaedic surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: By enhancing the processing of probabilistic tasks and the communication of their results, AI may be better able to detect sacral fractures than orthopaedic surgeons. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9478257
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94782572022-09-19 Detection of Sacral Fractures on Radiographs Using Artificial Intelligence Inagaki, Naoya Nakata, Norio Ichimori, Sina Udaka, Jun Mandai, Ayano Saito, Mitsuru JB JS Open Access Scientific Articles Sacral fractures are often difficult to diagnose on radiographs. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can improve the detection rate but cannot always be performed. The accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) in detecting orthopaedic fractures is now comparable with that of orthopaedic specialists. However, the ability of AI to detect sacral fractures has not been investigated, to our knowledge. We hypothesized that the ability to detect sacral fractures on radiographs could be improved by using AI, and aimed to develop an AI model to detect sacral fractures accurately on radiographs with better accuracy than that of orthopaedic surgeons. METHODS: Subjects were patients with suspected pelvic fractures for whom radiographs and CT scans had been obtained. The radiographs were labeled according to sacral fracture status based on CT results. The data set was divided into a training set (2,038 images) and a test set (200 images). Eight convolutional neural network (CNN) models were trained using the training set. Post-trained models were used to evaluate their discrimination ability. The detection ability of 4 experienced orthopaedic surgeons was also measured using the same test set. The results of fracture assessment by the orthopaedic surgeons were compared with those of the 3 CNNs with the greatest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: Among the 8 trained models, the highest areas under the curve were for InceptionV3 (0.989), Xception (0.987), and Inception ResNetV2 (0.984). The detection rate was significantly higher for these 3 CNNs than for the orthopaedic surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: By enhancing the processing of probabilistic tasks and the communication of their results, AI may be better able to detect sacral fractures than orthopaedic surgeons. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. 2022-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9478257/ /pubmed/36128254 http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.22.00030 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Scientific Articles
Inagaki, Naoya
Nakata, Norio
Ichimori, Sina
Udaka, Jun
Mandai, Ayano
Saito, Mitsuru
Detection of Sacral Fractures on Radiographs Using Artificial Intelligence
title Detection of Sacral Fractures on Radiographs Using Artificial Intelligence
title_full Detection of Sacral Fractures on Radiographs Using Artificial Intelligence
title_fullStr Detection of Sacral Fractures on Radiographs Using Artificial Intelligence
title_full_unstemmed Detection of Sacral Fractures on Radiographs Using Artificial Intelligence
title_short Detection of Sacral Fractures on Radiographs Using Artificial Intelligence
title_sort detection of sacral fractures on radiographs using artificial intelligence
topic Scientific Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9478257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36128254
http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.22.00030
work_keys_str_mv AT inagakinaoya detectionofsacralfracturesonradiographsusingartificialintelligence
AT nakatanorio detectionofsacralfracturesonradiographsusingartificialintelligence
AT ichimorisina detectionofsacralfracturesonradiographsusingartificialintelligence
AT udakajun detectionofsacralfracturesonradiographsusingartificialintelligence
AT mandaiayano detectionofsacralfracturesonradiographsusingartificialintelligence
AT saitomitsuru detectionofsacralfracturesonradiographsusingartificialintelligence