Cargando…
Detection of Sacral Fractures on Radiographs Using Artificial Intelligence
Sacral fractures are often difficult to diagnose on radiographs. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can improve the detection rate but cannot always be performed. The accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) in detecting orthopaedic fractures is now comparable with that of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9478257/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36128254 http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.22.00030 |
_version_ | 1784790529380188160 |
---|---|
author | Inagaki, Naoya Nakata, Norio Ichimori, Sina Udaka, Jun Mandai, Ayano Saito, Mitsuru |
author_facet | Inagaki, Naoya Nakata, Norio Ichimori, Sina Udaka, Jun Mandai, Ayano Saito, Mitsuru |
author_sort | Inagaki, Naoya |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sacral fractures are often difficult to diagnose on radiographs. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can improve the detection rate but cannot always be performed. The accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) in detecting orthopaedic fractures is now comparable with that of orthopaedic specialists. However, the ability of AI to detect sacral fractures has not been investigated, to our knowledge. We hypothesized that the ability to detect sacral fractures on radiographs could be improved by using AI, and aimed to develop an AI model to detect sacral fractures accurately on radiographs with better accuracy than that of orthopaedic surgeons. METHODS: Subjects were patients with suspected pelvic fractures for whom radiographs and CT scans had been obtained. The radiographs were labeled according to sacral fracture status based on CT results. The data set was divided into a training set (2,038 images) and a test set (200 images). Eight convolutional neural network (CNN) models were trained using the training set. Post-trained models were used to evaluate their discrimination ability. The detection ability of 4 experienced orthopaedic surgeons was also measured using the same test set. The results of fracture assessment by the orthopaedic surgeons were compared with those of the 3 CNNs with the greatest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: Among the 8 trained models, the highest areas under the curve were for InceptionV3 (0.989), Xception (0.987), and Inception ResNetV2 (0.984). The detection rate was significantly higher for these 3 CNNs than for the orthopaedic surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: By enhancing the processing of probabilistic tasks and the communication of their results, AI may be better able to detect sacral fractures than orthopaedic surgeons. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9478257 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94782572022-09-19 Detection of Sacral Fractures on Radiographs Using Artificial Intelligence Inagaki, Naoya Nakata, Norio Ichimori, Sina Udaka, Jun Mandai, Ayano Saito, Mitsuru JB JS Open Access Scientific Articles Sacral fractures are often difficult to diagnose on radiographs. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can improve the detection rate but cannot always be performed. The accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) in detecting orthopaedic fractures is now comparable with that of orthopaedic specialists. However, the ability of AI to detect sacral fractures has not been investigated, to our knowledge. We hypothesized that the ability to detect sacral fractures on radiographs could be improved by using AI, and aimed to develop an AI model to detect sacral fractures accurately on radiographs with better accuracy than that of orthopaedic surgeons. METHODS: Subjects were patients with suspected pelvic fractures for whom radiographs and CT scans had been obtained. The radiographs were labeled according to sacral fracture status based on CT results. The data set was divided into a training set (2,038 images) and a test set (200 images). Eight convolutional neural network (CNN) models were trained using the training set. Post-trained models were used to evaluate their discrimination ability. The detection ability of 4 experienced orthopaedic surgeons was also measured using the same test set. The results of fracture assessment by the orthopaedic surgeons were compared with those of the 3 CNNs with the greatest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: Among the 8 trained models, the highest areas under the curve were for InceptionV3 (0.989), Xception (0.987), and Inception ResNetV2 (0.984). The detection rate was significantly higher for these 3 CNNs than for the orthopaedic surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: By enhancing the processing of probabilistic tasks and the communication of their results, AI may be better able to detect sacral fractures than orthopaedic surgeons. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. 2022-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9478257/ /pubmed/36128254 http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.22.00030 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Articles Inagaki, Naoya Nakata, Norio Ichimori, Sina Udaka, Jun Mandai, Ayano Saito, Mitsuru Detection of Sacral Fractures on Radiographs Using Artificial Intelligence |
title | Detection of Sacral Fractures on Radiographs Using Artificial Intelligence |
title_full | Detection of Sacral Fractures on Radiographs Using Artificial Intelligence |
title_fullStr | Detection of Sacral Fractures on Radiographs Using Artificial Intelligence |
title_full_unstemmed | Detection of Sacral Fractures on Radiographs Using Artificial Intelligence |
title_short | Detection of Sacral Fractures on Radiographs Using Artificial Intelligence |
title_sort | detection of sacral fractures on radiographs using artificial intelligence |
topic | Scientific Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9478257/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36128254 http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.22.00030 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT inagakinaoya detectionofsacralfracturesonradiographsusingartificialintelligence AT nakatanorio detectionofsacralfracturesonradiographsusingartificialintelligence AT ichimorisina detectionofsacralfracturesonradiographsusingartificialintelligence AT udakajun detectionofsacralfracturesonradiographsusingartificialintelligence AT mandaiayano detectionofsacralfracturesonradiographsusingartificialintelligence AT saitomitsuru detectionofsacralfracturesonradiographsusingartificialintelligence |