Cargando…

Cardiac output monitoring with pulmonary versus trans-cardiopulmonary thermodilution in left ventricular assist devices: Interchangeable methods?

Cardiac output (CO) measurement is mandatory in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). Thermodilution with pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) remains the clinical gold standard to measure CO in these patients, however it is associated with several complications. Therefore, the agreement...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Quintana-Villamandos, Begoña, Barranco, Mónica, Fernández, Ignacio, Ruiz, Manuel, Del Cañizo, Juan Francisco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9478648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36117712
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.889190
_version_ 1784790618528022528
author Quintana-Villamandos, Begoña
Barranco, Mónica
Fernández, Ignacio
Ruiz, Manuel
Del Cañizo, Juan Francisco
author_facet Quintana-Villamandos, Begoña
Barranco, Mónica
Fernández, Ignacio
Ruiz, Manuel
Del Cañizo, Juan Francisco
author_sort Quintana-Villamandos, Begoña
collection PubMed
description Cardiac output (CO) measurement is mandatory in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). Thermodilution with pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) remains the clinical gold standard to measure CO in these patients, however it is associated with several complications. Therefore, the agreement between PAC and new, minimally invasive monitoring methods in LVAD needs to be further investigated. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy and reliability of transpulmonary thermodilution with a PiCCO2 monitor compared with pulmonary artery thermodilution with PAC in a LVAD. Continuous-flow LVADs were implanted in six mini-pigs to assist the left ventricle. We studied two methods of measuring CO—intermittent transpulmonary thermodilution (CO(TPTD)) by PiCCO2 and intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution by CAP, standard technique (CO(PTD))—obtained in four consecutive moments of the study: before starting the LVAD (basal moment), and with the LVAD started in normovolemia, hypervolemia (fluid overloading) and hypovolemia (shock hemorrhage). A total of 72 paired measurements were analysed. At the basal moment, CO(TPTD) and CO(PTD) were closely correlated (r (2) = 0.89), with a mean bias of −0.085 ± 0.245 L/min and percentage error of 16%. After 15 min of partial support LVAD, CO(TPTD) and CO(PTD) were closely correlated (r (2) = 0.79), with a mean bias of −0.040 ± 0.417 L/min and percentage error of 26%. After inducing hypervolemia, CO(TPTD) and CO(PTD) were closely correlated (r (2) = 0.78), with a mean bias of −0.093 ± 0.339 L/min and percentage error of 13%. After inducing hypovolemia, CO(TPTD) and CO(PTD) were closely correlated (r (2) = 0.76), with a mean bias of −0.045 ± 0.281 L/min and percentage error of 28%. This study demonstrates a good agreement between transpulmonary thermodilution by PiCCO monitor and pulmonary thermodilution by PAC in the intermittent measurement of CO in a porcine model with a continuous-flow LVAD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9478648
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94786482022-09-17 Cardiac output monitoring with pulmonary versus trans-cardiopulmonary thermodilution in left ventricular assist devices: Interchangeable methods? Quintana-Villamandos, Begoña Barranco, Mónica Fernández, Ignacio Ruiz, Manuel Del Cañizo, Juan Francisco Front Physiol Physiology Cardiac output (CO) measurement is mandatory in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). Thermodilution with pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) remains the clinical gold standard to measure CO in these patients, however it is associated with several complications. Therefore, the agreement between PAC and new, minimally invasive monitoring methods in LVAD needs to be further investigated. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy and reliability of transpulmonary thermodilution with a PiCCO2 monitor compared with pulmonary artery thermodilution with PAC in a LVAD. Continuous-flow LVADs were implanted in six mini-pigs to assist the left ventricle. We studied two methods of measuring CO—intermittent transpulmonary thermodilution (CO(TPTD)) by PiCCO2 and intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution by CAP, standard technique (CO(PTD))—obtained in four consecutive moments of the study: before starting the LVAD (basal moment), and with the LVAD started in normovolemia, hypervolemia (fluid overloading) and hypovolemia (shock hemorrhage). A total of 72 paired measurements were analysed. At the basal moment, CO(TPTD) and CO(PTD) were closely correlated (r (2) = 0.89), with a mean bias of −0.085 ± 0.245 L/min and percentage error of 16%. After 15 min of partial support LVAD, CO(TPTD) and CO(PTD) were closely correlated (r (2) = 0.79), with a mean bias of −0.040 ± 0.417 L/min and percentage error of 26%. After inducing hypervolemia, CO(TPTD) and CO(PTD) were closely correlated (r (2) = 0.78), with a mean bias of −0.093 ± 0.339 L/min and percentage error of 13%. After inducing hypovolemia, CO(TPTD) and CO(PTD) were closely correlated (r (2) = 0.76), with a mean bias of −0.045 ± 0.281 L/min and percentage error of 28%. This study demonstrates a good agreement between transpulmonary thermodilution by PiCCO monitor and pulmonary thermodilution by PAC in the intermittent measurement of CO in a porcine model with a continuous-flow LVAD. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9478648/ /pubmed/36117712 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.889190 Text en Copyright © 2022 Quintana-Villamandos, Barranco, Fernández, Ruiz and Del Cañizo. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Quintana-Villamandos, Begoña
Barranco, Mónica
Fernández, Ignacio
Ruiz, Manuel
Del Cañizo, Juan Francisco
Cardiac output monitoring with pulmonary versus trans-cardiopulmonary thermodilution in left ventricular assist devices: Interchangeable methods?
title Cardiac output monitoring with pulmonary versus trans-cardiopulmonary thermodilution in left ventricular assist devices: Interchangeable methods?
title_full Cardiac output monitoring with pulmonary versus trans-cardiopulmonary thermodilution in left ventricular assist devices: Interchangeable methods?
title_fullStr Cardiac output monitoring with pulmonary versus trans-cardiopulmonary thermodilution in left ventricular assist devices: Interchangeable methods?
title_full_unstemmed Cardiac output monitoring with pulmonary versus trans-cardiopulmonary thermodilution in left ventricular assist devices: Interchangeable methods?
title_short Cardiac output monitoring with pulmonary versus trans-cardiopulmonary thermodilution in left ventricular assist devices: Interchangeable methods?
title_sort cardiac output monitoring with pulmonary versus trans-cardiopulmonary thermodilution in left ventricular assist devices: interchangeable methods?
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9478648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36117712
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.889190
work_keys_str_mv AT quintanavillamandosbegona cardiacoutputmonitoringwithpulmonaryversustranscardiopulmonarythermodilutioninleftventricularassistdevicesinterchangeablemethods
AT barrancomonica cardiacoutputmonitoringwithpulmonaryversustranscardiopulmonarythermodilutioninleftventricularassistdevicesinterchangeablemethods
AT fernandezignacio cardiacoutputmonitoringwithpulmonaryversustranscardiopulmonarythermodilutioninleftventricularassistdevicesinterchangeablemethods
AT ruizmanuel cardiacoutputmonitoringwithpulmonaryversustranscardiopulmonarythermodilutioninleftventricularassistdevicesinterchangeablemethods
AT delcanizojuanfrancisco cardiacoutputmonitoringwithpulmonaryversustranscardiopulmonarythermodilutioninleftventricularassistdevicesinterchangeablemethods