Cargando…

Location of pedicle screw hold in relation to bone quality and loads

Introduction: Sufficient screw hold is an indispensable requirement for successful spinal fusion, but pedicle screw loosening is a highly prevalent burden. The aim of this study was to quantify the contribution of the pedicle and corpus region in relation to bone quality and loading amplitude of ped...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cornaz, Frédéric, Farshad, Mazda, Widmer, Jonas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9478651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36118575
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.953119
_version_ 1784790619226374144
author Cornaz, Frédéric
Farshad, Mazda
Widmer, Jonas
author_facet Cornaz, Frédéric
Farshad, Mazda
Widmer, Jonas
author_sort Cornaz, Frédéric
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Sufficient screw hold is an indispensable requirement for successful spinal fusion, but pedicle screw loosening is a highly prevalent burden. The aim of this study was to quantify the contribution of the pedicle and corpus region in relation to bone quality and loading amplitude of pedicle screws with traditional trajectories. Methods: After CT examination to classify bone quality, 14 pedicle screws were inserted into seven L5. Subsequently, Micro-CT images were acquired to analyze the screw’s location and the vertebrae were split in the midsagittal plane and horizontally along the screw’s axis to allow imprint tests with 6 mm long sections of the pedicle screws in a caudal direction perpendicular to the screw’s surface. Force-displacement curves in combination with the micro-CT data were used to reconstruct the resistance of the pedicle and corpus region at different loading amplitudes. Results: Bone quality was classified as normal in three specimens, as moderate in two and as bad in two specimens, resulting in six, four, and four pedicle screws per group. The screw length in the pedicle region in relation to the inserted screw length was measured at an average of 63%, 62%, and 52% for the three groups, respectively. At a calculated 100 N axial load acting on the whole pedicle screw, the pedicle region contributed an average of 55%, 58%, and 58% resistance for the normal, moderate, and bad bone quality specimens, respectively. With 500 N load, these values were measured at 59%, 63%, and 73% and with 1000 N load, they were quantified at 71%, 75%, and 81%. Conclusion: At lower loading amplitudes, the contribution of the pedicle and corpus region on pedicle screw hold are largely balanced and independent of bone quality. With increasing loading amplitudes, the contribution of the pedicle region increases disproportionally, and this increase is even more pronounced in situations with reduced bone quality. These results demonstrate the importance of the pedicle region for screw hold, especially for reduced bone quality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9478651
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94786512022-09-17 Location of pedicle screw hold in relation to bone quality and loads Cornaz, Frédéric Farshad, Mazda Widmer, Jonas Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology Introduction: Sufficient screw hold is an indispensable requirement for successful spinal fusion, but pedicle screw loosening is a highly prevalent burden. The aim of this study was to quantify the contribution of the pedicle and corpus region in relation to bone quality and loading amplitude of pedicle screws with traditional trajectories. Methods: After CT examination to classify bone quality, 14 pedicle screws were inserted into seven L5. Subsequently, Micro-CT images were acquired to analyze the screw’s location and the vertebrae were split in the midsagittal plane and horizontally along the screw’s axis to allow imprint tests with 6 mm long sections of the pedicle screws in a caudal direction perpendicular to the screw’s surface. Force-displacement curves in combination with the micro-CT data were used to reconstruct the resistance of the pedicle and corpus region at different loading amplitudes. Results: Bone quality was classified as normal in three specimens, as moderate in two and as bad in two specimens, resulting in six, four, and four pedicle screws per group. The screw length in the pedicle region in relation to the inserted screw length was measured at an average of 63%, 62%, and 52% for the three groups, respectively. At a calculated 100 N axial load acting on the whole pedicle screw, the pedicle region contributed an average of 55%, 58%, and 58% resistance for the normal, moderate, and bad bone quality specimens, respectively. With 500 N load, these values were measured at 59%, 63%, and 73% and with 1000 N load, they were quantified at 71%, 75%, and 81%. Conclusion: At lower loading amplitudes, the contribution of the pedicle and corpus region on pedicle screw hold are largely balanced and independent of bone quality. With increasing loading amplitudes, the contribution of the pedicle region increases disproportionally, and this increase is even more pronounced in situations with reduced bone quality. These results demonstrate the importance of the pedicle region for screw hold, especially for reduced bone quality. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9478651/ /pubmed/36118575 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.953119 Text en Copyright © 2022 Cornaz, Farshad and Widmer. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Cornaz, Frédéric
Farshad, Mazda
Widmer, Jonas
Location of pedicle screw hold in relation to bone quality and loads
title Location of pedicle screw hold in relation to bone quality and loads
title_full Location of pedicle screw hold in relation to bone quality and loads
title_fullStr Location of pedicle screw hold in relation to bone quality and loads
title_full_unstemmed Location of pedicle screw hold in relation to bone quality and loads
title_short Location of pedicle screw hold in relation to bone quality and loads
title_sort location of pedicle screw hold in relation to bone quality and loads
topic Bioengineering and Biotechnology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9478651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36118575
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.953119
work_keys_str_mv AT cornazfrederic locationofpediclescrewholdinrelationtobonequalityandloads
AT farshadmazda locationofpediclescrewholdinrelationtobonequalityandloads
AT widmerjonas locationofpediclescrewholdinrelationtobonequalityandloads