Cargando…
Canada's First Experience With a Patient-Adjudicated Cancer Research Grant Competition: A Case Study
Although patient partners have been part of grant review panels, they are rarely given decision-making authority and never given sole responsibility for determining what research to fund. In patient-oriented research, however, patient partners may be in the best position to determine what is needed...
Autores principales: | Ackerman, Ruth, Desserud, Don, Baudais, Nathalie, Lascelle, Debi, Badovinac, Kimberly |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9478694/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36118258 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23743735221123424 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Questionable research practices in competitive grant funding: A survey
por: Conix, Stijn, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
To Adjudicate or Not Adjudicate: That Is the Question
por: Hicks, Karen A., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Grant writing and grant peer review as questionable research practices
por: Conix, Stijn, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Co-creation of a patient engagement strategy in cancer research funding
por: Taccone, Michael S., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Adjudication of a Contract, Without Competitive Tendering for the Supply of a Cryogenerator
Publicado: (1976)