Cargando…

Lymph node ratio is a superior predictor in surgically treated early-onset pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND: The prognostic performance of four lymph node classifications, the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) N stage, lymph node ratio (LNR), log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS), and examined lymph nodes (ELN) in early-onset pancreatic cancer (EOPC) r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheng, Yangyang, Lu, Zhenhua, Shi, Xiaolei, Tan, Tianhua, Xing, Cheng, Xu, Jingyong, Cui, Hongyuan, Song, Jinghai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9479329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36119520
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.975846
_version_ 1784790764902940672
author Zheng, Yangyang
Lu, Zhenhua
Shi, Xiaolei
Tan, Tianhua
Xing, Cheng
Xu, Jingyong
Cui, Hongyuan
Song, Jinghai
author_facet Zheng, Yangyang
Lu, Zhenhua
Shi, Xiaolei
Tan, Tianhua
Xing, Cheng
Xu, Jingyong
Cui, Hongyuan
Song, Jinghai
author_sort Zheng, Yangyang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The prognostic performance of four lymph node classifications, the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) N stage, lymph node ratio (LNR), log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS), and examined lymph nodes (ELN) in early-onset pancreatic cancer (EOPC) remains unclear. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was searched for patients with EOPC from 2004 to 2016. 1048 patients were randomly divided into training (n = 733) and validation sets (n = 315). The predictive abilities of the four lymph node staging systems were compared using the Akaike information criteria (AIC), receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC), and C-index. Multivariate Cox analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors. A nomogram based on lymph node classification with the strongest predictive ability was established. The nomogram’s precision was verified by the C-index, calibration curves, and AUC. Kaplan–Meier analysis and log-rank tests were used to compare differences in survival at each stage of the nomogram. RESULTS: Compared with the 8th N stage, LODDS, and ELN, LNR had the highest C-index and AUC and the lowest AIC. Multivariate analysis showed that N stage, LODDS, LNR were independent risk factors associated with cancer specific survival (CSS), but not ELN. In the training set, the AUC values for the 1-, 3-, and 5-year CSS of the nomogram were 0.663, 0.728, and 0.760, respectively and similar results were observed in the validation set. In addition, Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed that the nomogram was also an important factor in the risk stratification of EOPC. CONCLUSION: We analyzed the predictive power of the four lymph node staging systems and found that LNR had the strongest predictive ability. Furthermore, the novel nomogram prognostic staging mode based on LNR was also an important factor in the risk stratification of EOPC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9479329
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94793292022-09-17 Lymph node ratio is a superior predictor in surgically treated early-onset pancreatic cancer Zheng, Yangyang Lu, Zhenhua Shi, Xiaolei Tan, Tianhua Xing, Cheng Xu, Jingyong Cui, Hongyuan Song, Jinghai Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: The prognostic performance of four lymph node classifications, the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) N stage, lymph node ratio (LNR), log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS), and examined lymph nodes (ELN) in early-onset pancreatic cancer (EOPC) remains unclear. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was searched for patients with EOPC from 2004 to 2016. 1048 patients were randomly divided into training (n = 733) and validation sets (n = 315). The predictive abilities of the four lymph node staging systems were compared using the Akaike information criteria (AIC), receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC), and C-index. Multivariate Cox analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors. A nomogram based on lymph node classification with the strongest predictive ability was established. The nomogram’s precision was verified by the C-index, calibration curves, and AUC. Kaplan–Meier analysis and log-rank tests were used to compare differences in survival at each stage of the nomogram. RESULTS: Compared with the 8th N stage, LODDS, and ELN, LNR had the highest C-index and AUC and the lowest AIC. Multivariate analysis showed that N stage, LODDS, LNR were independent risk factors associated with cancer specific survival (CSS), but not ELN. In the training set, the AUC values for the 1-, 3-, and 5-year CSS of the nomogram were 0.663, 0.728, and 0.760, respectively and similar results were observed in the validation set. In addition, Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed that the nomogram was also an important factor in the risk stratification of EOPC. CONCLUSION: We analyzed the predictive power of the four lymph node staging systems and found that LNR had the strongest predictive ability. Furthermore, the novel nomogram prognostic staging mode based on LNR was also an important factor in the risk stratification of EOPC. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9479329/ /pubmed/36119520 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.975846 Text en Copyright © 2022 Zheng, Lu, Shi, Tan, Xing, Xu, Cui and Song https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Zheng, Yangyang
Lu, Zhenhua
Shi, Xiaolei
Tan, Tianhua
Xing, Cheng
Xu, Jingyong
Cui, Hongyuan
Song, Jinghai
Lymph node ratio is a superior predictor in surgically treated early-onset pancreatic cancer
title Lymph node ratio is a superior predictor in surgically treated early-onset pancreatic cancer
title_full Lymph node ratio is a superior predictor in surgically treated early-onset pancreatic cancer
title_fullStr Lymph node ratio is a superior predictor in surgically treated early-onset pancreatic cancer
title_full_unstemmed Lymph node ratio is a superior predictor in surgically treated early-onset pancreatic cancer
title_short Lymph node ratio is a superior predictor in surgically treated early-onset pancreatic cancer
title_sort lymph node ratio is a superior predictor in surgically treated early-onset pancreatic cancer
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9479329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36119520
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.975846
work_keys_str_mv AT zhengyangyang lymphnoderatioisasuperiorpredictorinsurgicallytreatedearlyonsetpancreaticcancer
AT luzhenhua lymphnoderatioisasuperiorpredictorinsurgicallytreatedearlyonsetpancreaticcancer
AT shixiaolei lymphnoderatioisasuperiorpredictorinsurgicallytreatedearlyonsetpancreaticcancer
AT tantianhua lymphnoderatioisasuperiorpredictorinsurgicallytreatedearlyonsetpancreaticcancer
AT xingcheng lymphnoderatioisasuperiorpredictorinsurgicallytreatedearlyonsetpancreaticcancer
AT xujingyong lymphnoderatioisasuperiorpredictorinsurgicallytreatedearlyonsetpancreaticcancer
AT cuihongyuan lymphnoderatioisasuperiorpredictorinsurgicallytreatedearlyonsetpancreaticcancer
AT songjinghai lymphnoderatioisasuperiorpredictorinsurgicallytreatedearlyonsetpancreaticcancer