Cargando…

Erector spinae plane block versus its combination with superficial parasternal intercostal plane block for postoperative pain after cardiac surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study

BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare the effectiveness of bilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) block and superficial parasternal intercostal plane (S-PIP) + ESP block in acute post-sternotomy pain following cardiac surgery. METHODS: Forty-seven patients aged between 18 and 80 years of age with American S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dost, Burhan, Kaya, Cengiz, Turunc, Esra, Dokmeci, Hilal, Yucel, Semih Murat, Karakaya, Deniz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9479438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36114466
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01832-0
_version_ 1784790790610878464
author Dost, Burhan
Kaya, Cengiz
Turunc, Esra
Dokmeci, Hilal
Yucel, Semih Murat
Karakaya, Deniz
author_facet Dost, Burhan
Kaya, Cengiz
Turunc, Esra
Dokmeci, Hilal
Yucel, Semih Murat
Karakaya, Deniz
author_sort Dost, Burhan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare the effectiveness of bilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) block and superficial parasternal intercostal plane (S-PIP) + ESP block in acute post-sternotomy pain following cardiac surgery. METHODS: Forty-seven patients aged between 18 and 80 years of age with American Society of Anesthesiologists class II–III due to undergo median sternotomy for cardiac surgery were included in this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. Following randomization into two groups, one group received bilateral ultrasound-guided ESP and the other S-PIP plus ESP block. Morphine consumption within the first 24 h after surgery was the primary outcome of the study while NRS scores at rest, NRS scores when coughing, time taken until extubation, use of rescue analgesic, presence of nausea/vomiting, length of hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and patient satisfaction were secondary outcome measures. RESULTS: Morphine use up to 24 h following surgery was statistically significantly different between the ESP block and ESP + S-PIP block groups (18.63 ± 6.60 [15.84–21.41] mg/24 h vs 14.41 ± 5.38 [12.08–16.74] mg/24 h, p = 0.021). The ESP + S-PIP block group had considerably reduced pain scores compared to the ESP block group across all time points. Rescue analgesics were required in 21 (87.5%) patients in the ESP block group and seven (30.4%) in the ESP + S-PIP group (p < 0.001). PONV, length of stay in the ICU and hospital, and time to extubation were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: In open cardiac surgery, the combination of ESP and S-PIP blocks lowers pain scores and postoperative morphine requirement of patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials Registration No: NCT05191953, Registration Date: 14/01/2022. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-022-01832-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9479438
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94794382022-09-17 Erector spinae plane block versus its combination with superficial parasternal intercostal plane block for postoperative pain after cardiac surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study Dost, Burhan Kaya, Cengiz Turunc, Esra Dokmeci, Hilal Yucel, Semih Murat Karakaya, Deniz BMC Anesthesiol Research BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare the effectiveness of bilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) block and superficial parasternal intercostal plane (S-PIP) + ESP block in acute post-sternotomy pain following cardiac surgery. METHODS: Forty-seven patients aged between 18 and 80 years of age with American Society of Anesthesiologists class II–III due to undergo median sternotomy for cardiac surgery were included in this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. Following randomization into two groups, one group received bilateral ultrasound-guided ESP and the other S-PIP plus ESP block. Morphine consumption within the first 24 h after surgery was the primary outcome of the study while NRS scores at rest, NRS scores when coughing, time taken until extubation, use of rescue analgesic, presence of nausea/vomiting, length of hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and patient satisfaction were secondary outcome measures. RESULTS: Morphine use up to 24 h following surgery was statistically significantly different between the ESP block and ESP + S-PIP block groups (18.63 ± 6.60 [15.84–21.41] mg/24 h vs 14.41 ± 5.38 [12.08–16.74] mg/24 h, p = 0.021). The ESP + S-PIP block group had considerably reduced pain scores compared to the ESP block group across all time points. Rescue analgesics were required in 21 (87.5%) patients in the ESP block group and seven (30.4%) in the ESP + S-PIP group (p < 0.001). PONV, length of stay in the ICU and hospital, and time to extubation were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: In open cardiac surgery, the combination of ESP and S-PIP blocks lowers pain scores and postoperative morphine requirement of patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials Registration No: NCT05191953, Registration Date: 14/01/2022. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-022-01832-0. BioMed Central 2022-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9479438/ /pubmed/36114466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01832-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Dost, Burhan
Kaya, Cengiz
Turunc, Esra
Dokmeci, Hilal
Yucel, Semih Murat
Karakaya, Deniz
Erector spinae plane block versus its combination with superficial parasternal intercostal plane block for postoperative pain after cardiac surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study
title Erector spinae plane block versus its combination with superficial parasternal intercostal plane block for postoperative pain after cardiac surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study
title_full Erector spinae plane block versus its combination with superficial parasternal intercostal plane block for postoperative pain after cardiac surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study
title_fullStr Erector spinae plane block versus its combination with superficial parasternal intercostal plane block for postoperative pain after cardiac surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study
title_full_unstemmed Erector spinae plane block versus its combination with superficial parasternal intercostal plane block for postoperative pain after cardiac surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study
title_short Erector spinae plane block versus its combination with superficial parasternal intercostal plane block for postoperative pain after cardiac surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study
title_sort erector spinae plane block versus its combination with superficial parasternal intercostal plane block for postoperative pain after cardiac surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9479438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36114466
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01832-0
work_keys_str_mv AT dostburhan erectorspinaeplaneblockversusitscombinationwithsuperficialparasternalintercostalplaneblockforpostoperativepainaftercardiacsurgeryaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudy
AT kayacengiz erectorspinaeplaneblockversusitscombinationwithsuperficialparasternalintercostalplaneblockforpostoperativepainaftercardiacsurgeryaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudy
AT turuncesra erectorspinaeplaneblockversusitscombinationwithsuperficialparasternalintercostalplaneblockforpostoperativepainaftercardiacsurgeryaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudy
AT dokmecihilal erectorspinaeplaneblockversusitscombinationwithsuperficialparasternalintercostalplaneblockforpostoperativepainaftercardiacsurgeryaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudy
AT yucelsemihmurat erectorspinaeplaneblockversusitscombinationwithsuperficialparasternalintercostalplaneblockforpostoperativepainaftercardiacsurgeryaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudy
AT karakayadeniz erectorspinaeplaneblockversusitscombinationwithsuperficialparasternalintercostalplaneblockforpostoperativepainaftercardiacsurgeryaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudy