Cargando…
Erector spinae plane block versus its combination with superficial parasternal intercostal plane block for postoperative pain after cardiac surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study
BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare the effectiveness of bilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) block and superficial parasternal intercostal plane (S-PIP) + ESP block in acute post-sternotomy pain following cardiac surgery. METHODS: Forty-seven patients aged between 18 and 80 years of age with American S...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9479438/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36114466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01832-0 |
_version_ | 1784790790610878464 |
---|---|
author | Dost, Burhan Kaya, Cengiz Turunc, Esra Dokmeci, Hilal Yucel, Semih Murat Karakaya, Deniz |
author_facet | Dost, Burhan Kaya, Cengiz Turunc, Esra Dokmeci, Hilal Yucel, Semih Murat Karakaya, Deniz |
author_sort | Dost, Burhan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare the effectiveness of bilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) block and superficial parasternal intercostal plane (S-PIP) + ESP block in acute post-sternotomy pain following cardiac surgery. METHODS: Forty-seven patients aged between 18 and 80 years of age with American Society of Anesthesiologists class II–III due to undergo median sternotomy for cardiac surgery were included in this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. Following randomization into two groups, one group received bilateral ultrasound-guided ESP and the other S-PIP plus ESP block. Morphine consumption within the first 24 h after surgery was the primary outcome of the study while NRS scores at rest, NRS scores when coughing, time taken until extubation, use of rescue analgesic, presence of nausea/vomiting, length of hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and patient satisfaction were secondary outcome measures. RESULTS: Morphine use up to 24 h following surgery was statistically significantly different between the ESP block and ESP + S-PIP block groups (18.63 ± 6.60 [15.84–21.41] mg/24 h vs 14.41 ± 5.38 [12.08–16.74] mg/24 h, p = 0.021). The ESP + S-PIP block group had considerably reduced pain scores compared to the ESP block group across all time points. Rescue analgesics were required in 21 (87.5%) patients in the ESP block group and seven (30.4%) in the ESP + S-PIP group (p < 0.001). PONV, length of stay in the ICU and hospital, and time to extubation were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: In open cardiac surgery, the combination of ESP and S-PIP blocks lowers pain scores and postoperative morphine requirement of patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials Registration No: NCT05191953, Registration Date: 14/01/2022. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-022-01832-0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9479438 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94794382022-09-17 Erector spinae plane block versus its combination with superficial parasternal intercostal plane block for postoperative pain after cardiac surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study Dost, Burhan Kaya, Cengiz Turunc, Esra Dokmeci, Hilal Yucel, Semih Murat Karakaya, Deniz BMC Anesthesiol Research BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare the effectiveness of bilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) block and superficial parasternal intercostal plane (S-PIP) + ESP block in acute post-sternotomy pain following cardiac surgery. METHODS: Forty-seven patients aged between 18 and 80 years of age with American Society of Anesthesiologists class II–III due to undergo median sternotomy for cardiac surgery were included in this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. Following randomization into two groups, one group received bilateral ultrasound-guided ESP and the other S-PIP plus ESP block. Morphine consumption within the first 24 h after surgery was the primary outcome of the study while NRS scores at rest, NRS scores when coughing, time taken until extubation, use of rescue analgesic, presence of nausea/vomiting, length of hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and patient satisfaction were secondary outcome measures. RESULTS: Morphine use up to 24 h following surgery was statistically significantly different between the ESP block and ESP + S-PIP block groups (18.63 ± 6.60 [15.84–21.41] mg/24 h vs 14.41 ± 5.38 [12.08–16.74] mg/24 h, p = 0.021). The ESP + S-PIP block group had considerably reduced pain scores compared to the ESP block group across all time points. Rescue analgesics were required in 21 (87.5%) patients in the ESP block group and seven (30.4%) in the ESP + S-PIP group (p < 0.001). PONV, length of stay in the ICU and hospital, and time to extubation were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: In open cardiac surgery, the combination of ESP and S-PIP blocks lowers pain scores and postoperative morphine requirement of patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials Registration No: NCT05191953, Registration Date: 14/01/2022. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-022-01832-0. BioMed Central 2022-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9479438/ /pubmed/36114466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01832-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Dost, Burhan Kaya, Cengiz Turunc, Esra Dokmeci, Hilal Yucel, Semih Murat Karakaya, Deniz Erector spinae plane block versus its combination with superficial parasternal intercostal plane block for postoperative pain after cardiac surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study |
title | Erector spinae plane block versus its combination with superficial parasternal intercostal plane block for postoperative pain after cardiac surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study |
title_full | Erector spinae plane block versus its combination with superficial parasternal intercostal plane block for postoperative pain after cardiac surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study |
title_fullStr | Erector spinae plane block versus its combination with superficial parasternal intercostal plane block for postoperative pain after cardiac surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study |
title_full_unstemmed | Erector spinae plane block versus its combination with superficial parasternal intercostal plane block for postoperative pain after cardiac surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study |
title_short | Erector spinae plane block versus its combination with superficial parasternal intercostal plane block for postoperative pain after cardiac surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study |
title_sort | erector spinae plane block versus its combination with superficial parasternal intercostal plane block for postoperative pain after cardiac surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9479438/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36114466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01832-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dostburhan erectorspinaeplaneblockversusitscombinationwithsuperficialparasternalintercostalplaneblockforpostoperativepainaftercardiacsurgeryaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudy AT kayacengiz erectorspinaeplaneblockversusitscombinationwithsuperficialparasternalintercostalplaneblockforpostoperativepainaftercardiacsurgeryaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudy AT turuncesra erectorspinaeplaneblockversusitscombinationwithsuperficialparasternalintercostalplaneblockforpostoperativepainaftercardiacsurgeryaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudy AT dokmecihilal erectorspinaeplaneblockversusitscombinationwithsuperficialparasternalintercostalplaneblockforpostoperativepainaftercardiacsurgeryaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudy AT yucelsemihmurat erectorspinaeplaneblockversusitscombinationwithsuperficialparasternalintercostalplaneblockforpostoperativepainaftercardiacsurgeryaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudy AT karakayadeniz erectorspinaeplaneblockversusitscombinationwithsuperficialparasternalintercostalplaneblockforpostoperativepainaftercardiacsurgeryaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudy |