Cargando…
Adhesion between an extruded coil and the oculomotor nerve: Unexpected interference due to coil extrusion
BACKGROUND: When direct clipping is performed for a recurrent aneurysm after coil embolization, there are sometimes findings of the coil adhering to the surrounding tissue, after it has been extruded from inside the aneurysm into the subarachnoid space and brain parenchyma. However, there have only...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Scientific Scholar
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9479515/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36128093 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_574_2022 |
_version_ | 1784790807582081024 |
---|---|
author | Yokoya, Shigeomi Oka, Hideki Hino, Akihiko |
author_facet | Yokoya, Shigeomi Oka, Hideki Hino, Akihiko |
author_sort | Yokoya, Shigeomi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: When direct clipping is performed for a recurrent aneurysm after coil embolization, there are sometimes findings of the coil adhering to the surrounding tissue, after it has been extruded from inside the aneurysm into the subarachnoid space and brain parenchyma. However, there have only been few previous reports on extruded coils adhering to the cranial nerves, preventing aneurysm dissection and clip application. CASE DESCRIPTION: We performed the coil embolization of a ruptured aneurysm originating from the bifurcation of basilar artery and superior cerebellar artery in a 36-year-old male patient. Recurrence was confirmed 5 years after embolization and direct clipping was performed. The intraoperative finding was that part of the coil was strongly adhering to or encircling the oculomotor nerve, making it difficult to achieve sufficient mobility of the cerebral aneurysm. CONCLUSION: When direct clipping is performed after coil embolization of an intracranial aneurysm, part of the coil may be extruded from the aneurysm and then adhere strongly to the cranial nerve. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9479515 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Scientific Scholar |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94795152022-09-19 Adhesion between an extruded coil and the oculomotor nerve: Unexpected interference due to coil extrusion Yokoya, Shigeomi Oka, Hideki Hino, Akihiko Surg Neurol Int Image Report BACKGROUND: When direct clipping is performed for a recurrent aneurysm after coil embolization, there are sometimes findings of the coil adhering to the surrounding tissue, after it has been extruded from inside the aneurysm into the subarachnoid space and brain parenchyma. However, there have only been few previous reports on extruded coils adhering to the cranial nerves, preventing aneurysm dissection and clip application. CASE DESCRIPTION: We performed the coil embolization of a ruptured aneurysm originating from the bifurcation of basilar artery and superior cerebellar artery in a 36-year-old male patient. Recurrence was confirmed 5 years after embolization and direct clipping was performed. The intraoperative finding was that part of the coil was strongly adhering to or encircling the oculomotor nerve, making it difficult to achieve sufficient mobility of the cerebral aneurysm. CONCLUSION: When direct clipping is performed after coil embolization of an intracranial aneurysm, part of the coil may be extruded from the aneurysm and then adhere strongly to the cranial nerve. Scientific Scholar 2022-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9479515/ /pubmed/36128093 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_574_2022 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Surgical Neurology International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Image Report Yokoya, Shigeomi Oka, Hideki Hino, Akihiko Adhesion between an extruded coil and the oculomotor nerve: Unexpected interference due to coil extrusion |
title | Adhesion between an extruded coil and the oculomotor nerve: Unexpected interference due to coil extrusion |
title_full | Adhesion between an extruded coil and the oculomotor nerve: Unexpected interference due to coil extrusion |
title_fullStr | Adhesion between an extruded coil and the oculomotor nerve: Unexpected interference due to coil extrusion |
title_full_unstemmed | Adhesion between an extruded coil and the oculomotor nerve: Unexpected interference due to coil extrusion |
title_short | Adhesion between an extruded coil and the oculomotor nerve: Unexpected interference due to coil extrusion |
title_sort | adhesion between an extruded coil and the oculomotor nerve: unexpected interference due to coil extrusion |
topic | Image Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9479515/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36128093 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_574_2022 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yokoyashigeomi adhesionbetweenanextrudedcoilandtheoculomotornerveunexpectedinterferenceduetocoilextrusion AT okahideki adhesionbetweenanextrudedcoilandtheoculomotornerveunexpectedinterferenceduetocoilextrusion AT hinoakihiko adhesionbetweenanextrudedcoilandtheoculomotornerveunexpectedinterferenceduetocoilextrusion |