Cargando…

Invisalign treatment with mandibular advancement: A retrospective cohort cephalometric appraisal

OBJECTIVE: To examine the skeletal, dental, and soft-tissue cephalometric effects of class II correction using Invisalign’s mandibular advancement feature in growing patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort clinical study was performed on cases that were started between 2017 and 2019....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sabouni, Waddah, Hansa, Ismaeel, Al Ali, Shuaib Mohamed, Adel, Samar M., Vaid, Nikhilesh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Scientific Scholar 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9479556/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36128356
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/JCIS_64_2022
_version_ 1784790817350615040
author Sabouni, Waddah
Hansa, Ismaeel
Al Ali, Shuaib Mohamed
Adel, Samar M.
Vaid, Nikhilesh
author_facet Sabouni, Waddah
Hansa, Ismaeel
Al Ali, Shuaib Mohamed
Adel, Samar M.
Vaid, Nikhilesh
author_sort Sabouni, Waddah
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To examine the skeletal, dental, and soft-tissue cephalometric effects of class II correction using Invisalign’s mandibular advancement feature in growing patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort clinical study was performed on cases that were started between 2017 and 2019. A total of 32 patients (13 females, 19 males), with an average age of 13 years old (9.9-14.8 years) had undergone Invisalign treatment (Align Technology, Inc., San Jose, CA) wherein the mandibular advancement phase was completed were included. Photos, digital study models, and cephalograms were taken once during the patients’ initial visit and again upon completing the mandibular advancement phase of treatment. The number of aligners worn and the time of treatment in months was recorded for each subject. Cephalometric analysis was performed and overjet and overbite were measured. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS statistical software (version 25; SPSS, Chicago, Ill) and the level of significance was set at P <0.05. Descriptive statistics were performed to generate means and differences for each cephalometric measurement as well as patient data including age, treatment time, and aligner number. Differences between measurements from patients before treatment (T1) and after treatment (T2) with the mandibular advancement feature were evaluated using a paired t -test. RESULTS: All 32 patients had multiple jumps staged for the precision wings, i.e., incremental advancement. The average length of treatment for the MA phase was 9.2 months (7.5-13.8 months) and the average number of aligners used during this time was 37 (30-55). Statistically significant differences between T1 and T2, in favor of class II correction, were observed in the ANB angle, WITS appraisal, facial convexity, and mandibular length. The nasolabial angle, overjet, and overbite also showed statistically significant changes between T1 and T2. CONCLUSION: Invisalign aligners with the mandibular advancement feature took approximately 9 months for 1.5 mm of overjet correction. The lower incisor angulation was maintained during class II correction. The minimal skeletal changes are in favor of class II correction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9479556
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Scientific Scholar
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94795562022-09-19 Invisalign treatment with mandibular advancement: A retrospective cohort cephalometric appraisal Sabouni, Waddah Hansa, Ismaeel Al Ali, Shuaib Mohamed Adel, Samar M. Vaid, Nikhilesh J Clin Imaging Sci Original Research OBJECTIVE: To examine the skeletal, dental, and soft-tissue cephalometric effects of class II correction using Invisalign’s mandibular advancement feature in growing patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort clinical study was performed on cases that were started between 2017 and 2019. A total of 32 patients (13 females, 19 males), with an average age of 13 years old (9.9-14.8 years) had undergone Invisalign treatment (Align Technology, Inc., San Jose, CA) wherein the mandibular advancement phase was completed were included. Photos, digital study models, and cephalograms were taken once during the patients’ initial visit and again upon completing the mandibular advancement phase of treatment. The number of aligners worn and the time of treatment in months was recorded for each subject. Cephalometric analysis was performed and overjet and overbite were measured. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS statistical software (version 25; SPSS, Chicago, Ill) and the level of significance was set at P <0.05. Descriptive statistics were performed to generate means and differences for each cephalometric measurement as well as patient data including age, treatment time, and aligner number. Differences between measurements from patients before treatment (T1) and after treatment (T2) with the mandibular advancement feature were evaluated using a paired t -test. RESULTS: All 32 patients had multiple jumps staged for the precision wings, i.e., incremental advancement. The average length of treatment for the MA phase was 9.2 months (7.5-13.8 months) and the average number of aligners used during this time was 37 (30-55). Statistically significant differences between T1 and T2, in favor of class II correction, were observed in the ANB angle, WITS appraisal, facial convexity, and mandibular length. The nasolabial angle, overjet, and overbite also showed statistically significant changes between T1 and T2. CONCLUSION: Invisalign aligners with the mandibular advancement feature took approximately 9 months for 1.5 mm of overjet correction. The lower incisor angulation was maintained during class II correction. The minimal skeletal changes are in favor of class II correction. Scientific Scholar 2022-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9479556/ /pubmed/36128356 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/JCIS_64_2022 Text en © 2022 Published by Scientific Scholar on behalf of Journal of Clinical Imaging Science https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Research
Sabouni, Waddah
Hansa, Ismaeel
Al Ali, Shuaib Mohamed
Adel, Samar M.
Vaid, Nikhilesh
Invisalign treatment with mandibular advancement: A retrospective cohort cephalometric appraisal
title Invisalign treatment with mandibular advancement: A retrospective cohort cephalometric appraisal
title_full Invisalign treatment with mandibular advancement: A retrospective cohort cephalometric appraisal
title_fullStr Invisalign treatment with mandibular advancement: A retrospective cohort cephalometric appraisal
title_full_unstemmed Invisalign treatment with mandibular advancement: A retrospective cohort cephalometric appraisal
title_short Invisalign treatment with mandibular advancement: A retrospective cohort cephalometric appraisal
title_sort invisalign treatment with mandibular advancement: a retrospective cohort cephalometric appraisal
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9479556/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36128356
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/JCIS_64_2022
work_keys_str_mv AT sabouniwaddah invisaligntreatmentwithmandibularadvancementaretrospectivecohortcephalometricappraisal
AT hansaismaeel invisaligntreatmentwithmandibularadvancementaretrospectivecohortcephalometricappraisal
AT alalishuaibmohamed invisaligntreatmentwithmandibularadvancementaretrospectivecohortcephalometricappraisal
AT adelsamarm invisaligntreatmentwithmandibularadvancementaretrospectivecohortcephalometricappraisal
AT vaidnikhilesh invisaligntreatmentwithmandibularadvancementaretrospectivecohortcephalometricappraisal