Cargando…
Telemedicine in practice: Patient selection and strategies adopted in spinal care during the COVID-19 era and beyond
BACKGROUND: The SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a substantial effect on health-care systems around the world. To deal with this challenge, we developed a prospectus design and test a teleconsultation procedure suitable for both diagnostic and therapeutic needs of outpatients in our Spine and...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Scientific Scholar
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9479600/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36128140 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_638_2022 |
_version_ | 1784790827093983232 |
---|---|
author | Rispoli, Rossella Cappelletto, Barbara |
author_facet | Rispoli, Rossella Cappelletto, Barbara |
author_sort | Rispoli, Rossella |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a substantial effect on health-care systems around the world. To deal with this challenge, we developed a prospectus design and test a teleconsultation procedure suitable for both diagnostic and therapeutic needs of outpatients in our Spine and Spinal Cord Surgery Units. METHODS: (1) The first 15 patients received in-person and telemedicine visits: Our pilot began with screening protocol that involved 15 patients who received an in-person assessment and a telemedicine consult. The 15 patients who were selected were already known to our unit after having had at least one previous in-person visit. Further, they had to be neurologically intact or have a stable neurological examination. The secondary teleconsultation took place as a synchronous face-to-face communication between the doctor and the patient through a video interface (Lifesize Video Conferencing, Austin, Texas). If the patient demonstrated worsening of symptoms or of their condition, they were rescheduled for an immediate/timely in-person revisit with a spinal physician. (2) Fifty patients were offered telemedicine visits alone: 35 accepted: Next, from 2020 to 2021, we provided a questionnaire to 50 patients, we deemed eligible for teleconsultations: 35 agreed to the teleconsultations, while 15 refused (i.e., selecting direct in-person assessments). RESULTS: We found a comparable quality for the clinical consultations/assessments provided in-person versus through telemedicine. Further, the additional 35 patients who were positively impressed with the quality of the medical care provided utilizing the telemedicine/remote visits alone. CONCLUSION: When pandemic conditions worsen, telemedicine appears to be a viable and important tool/ alternative for spinal surgeons to screen potential patients for treatment/surgery. This preliminary study suggests that a remote examination may be effective, particularly in patients who have previously undergone prior in-person evaluations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9479600 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Scientific Scholar |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94796002022-09-19 Telemedicine in practice: Patient selection and strategies adopted in spinal care during the COVID-19 era and beyond Rispoli, Rossella Cappelletto, Barbara Surg Neurol Int Original Article BACKGROUND: The SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a substantial effect on health-care systems around the world. To deal with this challenge, we developed a prospectus design and test a teleconsultation procedure suitable for both diagnostic and therapeutic needs of outpatients in our Spine and Spinal Cord Surgery Units. METHODS: (1) The first 15 patients received in-person and telemedicine visits: Our pilot began with screening protocol that involved 15 patients who received an in-person assessment and a telemedicine consult. The 15 patients who were selected were already known to our unit after having had at least one previous in-person visit. Further, they had to be neurologically intact or have a stable neurological examination. The secondary teleconsultation took place as a synchronous face-to-face communication between the doctor and the patient through a video interface (Lifesize Video Conferencing, Austin, Texas). If the patient demonstrated worsening of symptoms or of their condition, they were rescheduled for an immediate/timely in-person revisit with a spinal physician. (2) Fifty patients were offered telemedicine visits alone: 35 accepted: Next, from 2020 to 2021, we provided a questionnaire to 50 patients, we deemed eligible for teleconsultations: 35 agreed to the teleconsultations, while 15 refused (i.e., selecting direct in-person assessments). RESULTS: We found a comparable quality for the clinical consultations/assessments provided in-person versus through telemedicine. Further, the additional 35 patients who were positively impressed with the quality of the medical care provided utilizing the telemedicine/remote visits alone. CONCLUSION: When pandemic conditions worsen, telemedicine appears to be a viable and important tool/ alternative for spinal surgeons to screen potential patients for treatment/surgery. This preliminary study suggests that a remote examination may be effective, particularly in patients who have previously undergone prior in-person evaluations. Scientific Scholar 2022-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9479600/ /pubmed/36128140 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_638_2022 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Surgical Neurology International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Rispoli, Rossella Cappelletto, Barbara Telemedicine in practice: Patient selection and strategies adopted in spinal care during the COVID-19 era and beyond |
title | Telemedicine in practice: Patient selection and strategies adopted in spinal care during the COVID-19 era and beyond |
title_full | Telemedicine in practice: Patient selection and strategies adopted in spinal care during the COVID-19 era and beyond |
title_fullStr | Telemedicine in practice: Patient selection and strategies adopted in spinal care during the COVID-19 era and beyond |
title_full_unstemmed | Telemedicine in practice: Patient selection and strategies adopted in spinal care during the COVID-19 era and beyond |
title_short | Telemedicine in practice: Patient selection and strategies adopted in spinal care during the COVID-19 era and beyond |
title_sort | telemedicine in practice: patient selection and strategies adopted in spinal care during the covid-19 era and beyond |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9479600/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36128140 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_638_2022 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rispolirossella telemedicineinpracticepatientselectionandstrategiesadoptedinspinalcareduringthecovid19eraandbeyond AT cappellettobarbara telemedicineinpracticepatientselectionandstrategiesadoptedinspinalcareduringthecovid19eraandbeyond |