Cargando…
Deep brain stimulation for refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder: A review and analysis of the FDA MAUDE database
BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is used as a treatment option for patients diagnosed with a form of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) that is highly resistant to conventional treatment methods. In 2009, DBS was granted a humanitarian device exemption-approval by the Food and Drug Administ...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Scientific Scholar
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9479641/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36128133 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_613_2022 |
_version_ | 1784790836756611072 |
---|---|
author | Porwal, Mokshal H. Karra, Hamsitha Sharma, Umesh Bhatti, Danish |
author_facet | Porwal, Mokshal H. Karra, Hamsitha Sharma, Umesh Bhatti, Danish |
author_sort | Porwal, Mokshal H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is used as a treatment option for patients diagnosed with a form of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) that is highly resistant to conventional treatment methods. In 2009, DBS was granted a humanitarian device exemption-approval by the Food and Drug Administration after promising preliminary data. Monitoring of long-term safety data through post market surveillance of adverse events has not yet been conducted for DBS in OCD patients. This study aims to address this critical knowledge gap. METHODS: All patient- and device-related (PR; DR) reports from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2021, were downloaded and compiled from the manufacturer and user facility device experience (MAUDE) database pertaining to DBS for OCD using the product class name “Deep Brain Stimulator For OCD.” Data in this study were examined using descriptive statistics to evaluate for frequency of reporting. RESULTS: The most frequently reported PR adverse event categories included psychiatric (40%), neurological (19%), other (14%), decreased therapeutic response (10%), and infections (10%). The most frequent DR reports were high impedance (14%), energy output problem (7%), battery problem (7%), malposition of device (7%), and improper/incorrect procedure or method (7%). CONCLUSION: The PR and DR adverse events in our study align with the previous findings of adverse events. They also further solidify that DBS for refractory OCD may be a viable option for the right patient population. However, further studies are essential given the limitations of the MAUDE database. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9479641 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Scientific Scholar |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94796412022-09-19 Deep brain stimulation for refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder: A review and analysis of the FDA MAUDE database Porwal, Mokshal H. Karra, Hamsitha Sharma, Umesh Bhatti, Danish Surg Neurol Int Original Article BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is used as a treatment option for patients diagnosed with a form of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) that is highly resistant to conventional treatment methods. In 2009, DBS was granted a humanitarian device exemption-approval by the Food and Drug Administration after promising preliminary data. Monitoring of long-term safety data through post market surveillance of adverse events has not yet been conducted for DBS in OCD patients. This study aims to address this critical knowledge gap. METHODS: All patient- and device-related (PR; DR) reports from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2021, were downloaded and compiled from the manufacturer and user facility device experience (MAUDE) database pertaining to DBS for OCD using the product class name “Deep Brain Stimulator For OCD.” Data in this study were examined using descriptive statistics to evaluate for frequency of reporting. RESULTS: The most frequently reported PR adverse event categories included psychiatric (40%), neurological (19%), other (14%), decreased therapeutic response (10%), and infections (10%). The most frequent DR reports were high impedance (14%), energy output problem (7%), battery problem (7%), malposition of device (7%), and improper/incorrect procedure or method (7%). CONCLUSION: The PR and DR adverse events in our study align with the previous findings of adverse events. They also further solidify that DBS for refractory OCD may be a viable option for the right patient population. However, further studies are essential given the limitations of the MAUDE database. Scientific Scholar 2022-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9479641/ /pubmed/36128133 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_613_2022 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Surgical Neurology International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Porwal, Mokshal H. Karra, Hamsitha Sharma, Umesh Bhatti, Danish Deep brain stimulation for refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder: A review and analysis of the FDA MAUDE database |
title | Deep brain stimulation for refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder: A review and analysis of the FDA MAUDE database |
title_full | Deep brain stimulation for refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder: A review and analysis of the FDA MAUDE database |
title_fullStr | Deep brain stimulation for refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder: A review and analysis of the FDA MAUDE database |
title_full_unstemmed | Deep brain stimulation for refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder: A review and analysis of the FDA MAUDE database |
title_short | Deep brain stimulation for refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder: A review and analysis of the FDA MAUDE database |
title_sort | deep brain stimulation for refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder: a review and analysis of the fda maude database |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9479641/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36128133 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_613_2022 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT porwalmokshalh deepbrainstimulationforrefractoryobsessivecompulsivedisorderareviewandanalysisofthefdamaudedatabase AT karrahamsitha deepbrainstimulationforrefractoryobsessivecompulsivedisorderareviewandanalysisofthefdamaudedatabase AT sharmaumesh deepbrainstimulationforrefractoryobsessivecompulsivedisorderareviewandanalysisofthefdamaudedatabase AT bhattidanish deepbrainstimulationforrefractoryobsessivecompulsivedisorderareviewandanalysisofthefdamaudedatabase |