Cargando…
Quantitative classification of invasive and noninvasive breast cancer using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the mammary gland
OBJECTIVES: Breast cancers are classified as invasive or noninvasive based on histopathological findings. Although time-intensity curve (TIC) analysis using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can differentiate benign from malignant disease, its diagnostic ability to quantitatively distinguish between...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Scientific Scholar
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9479655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36128357 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/JCIS_56_2022 |
_version_ | 1784790839896047616 |
---|---|
author | Miyazaki, Yoshiaki Shimizu, Juichiro Kubo, Yuichiro Tabata, Nobuyuki Aso, Tomohiko |
author_facet | Miyazaki, Yoshiaki Shimizu, Juichiro Kubo, Yuichiro Tabata, Nobuyuki Aso, Tomohiko |
author_sort | Miyazaki, Yoshiaki |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Breast cancers are classified as invasive or noninvasive based on histopathological findings. Although time-intensity curve (TIC) analysis using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can differentiate benign from malignant disease, its diagnostic ability to quantitatively distinguish between invasive and noninvasive breast cancers has not been determined. In this study, we evaluated the ability of TIC analysis of dynamic MRI data (MRI-TIC) to distinguish between invasive and noninvasive breast cancers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We collected and analyzed data for 429 cases of epithelial invasive and noninvasive breast carcinomas. TIC features were extracted in washout areas suggestive of malignancy. RESULTS: The graph determining the positive diagnosis rate for invasive and noninvasive cases revealed that the cut-off θ(i/ni) value was 21.6° (invasive: θ(w) > 21.6°, noninvasive: θ(w) ≤ 21.6°). Tissues were classified as invasive or noninvasive using this cut-off value, and each result was compared with the histopathological diagnosis. Using this method, the accuracy of tissue classification by MRI-TIC was 88.6% (380/429), which was higher than that using ultrasound (73.4%, 315/429). CONCLUSION: MRI-TIC is effective for the classification of invasive vs. noninvasive breast cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9479655 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Scientific Scholar |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94796552022-09-19 Quantitative classification of invasive and noninvasive breast cancer using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the mammary gland Miyazaki, Yoshiaki Shimizu, Juichiro Kubo, Yuichiro Tabata, Nobuyuki Aso, Tomohiko J Clin Imaging Sci Original Research OBJECTIVES: Breast cancers are classified as invasive or noninvasive based on histopathological findings. Although time-intensity curve (TIC) analysis using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can differentiate benign from malignant disease, its diagnostic ability to quantitatively distinguish between invasive and noninvasive breast cancers has not been determined. In this study, we evaluated the ability of TIC analysis of dynamic MRI data (MRI-TIC) to distinguish between invasive and noninvasive breast cancers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We collected and analyzed data for 429 cases of epithelial invasive and noninvasive breast carcinomas. TIC features were extracted in washout areas suggestive of malignancy. RESULTS: The graph determining the positive diagnosis rate for invasive and noninvasive cases revealed that the cut-off θ(i/ni) value was 21.6° (invasive: θ(w) > 21.6°, noninvasive: θ(w) ≤ 21.6°). Tissues were classified as invasive or noninvasive using this cut-off value, and each result was compared with the histopathological diagnosis. Using this method, the accuracy of tissue classification by MRI-TIC was 88.6% (380/429), which was higher than that using ultrasound (73.4%, 315/429). CONCLUSION: MRI-TIC is effective for the classification of invasive vs. noninvasive breast cancer. Scientific Scholar 2022-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9479655/ /pubmed/36128357 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/JCIS_56_2022 Text en © 2022 Published by Scientific Scholar on behalf of Journal of Clinical Imaging Science https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Miyazaki, Yoshiaki Shimizu, Juichiro Kubo, Yuichiro Tabata, Nobuyuki Aso, Tomohiko Quantitative classification of invasive and noninvasive breast cancer using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the mammary gland |
title | Quantitative classification of invasive and noninvasive breast cancer using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the mammary gland |
title_full | Quantitative classification of invasive and noninvasive breast cancer using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the mammary gland |
title_fullStr | Quantitative classification of invasive and noninvasive breast cancer using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the mammary gland |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantitative classification of invasive and noninvasive breast cancer using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the mammary gland |
title_short | Quantitative classification of invasive and noninvasive breast cancer using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the mammary gland |
title_sort | quantitative classification of invasive and noninvasive breast cancer using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the mammary gland |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9479655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36128357 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/JCIS_56_2022 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT miyazakiyoshiaki quantitativeclassificationofinvasiveandnoninvasivebreastcancerusingdynamicmagneticresonanceimagingofthemammarygland AT shimizujuichiro quantitativeclassificationofinvasiveandnoninvasivebreastcancerusingdynamicmagneticresonanceimagingofthemammarygland AT kuboyuichiro quantitativeclassificationofinvasiveandnoninvasivebreastcancerusingdynamicmagneticresonanceimagingofthemammarygland AT tabatanobuyuki quantitativeclassificationofinvasiveandnoninvasivebreastcancerusingdynamicmagneticresonanceimagingofthemammarygland AT asotomohiko quantitativeclassificationofinvasiveandnoninvasivebreastcancerusingdynamicmagneticresonanceimagingofthemammarygland |