Cargando…

Quantitative classification of invasive and noninvasive breast cancer using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the mammary gland

OBJECTIVES: Breast cancers are classified as invasive or noninvasive based on histopathological findings. Although time-intensity curve (TIC) analysis using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can differentiate benign from malignant disease, its diagnostic ability to quantitatively distinguish between...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miyazaki, Yoshiaki, Shimizu, Juichiro, Kubo, Yuichiro, Tabata, Nobuyuki, Aso, Tomohiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Scientific Scholar 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9479655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36128357
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/JCIS_56_2022
_version_ 1784790839896047616
author Miyazaki, Yoshiaki
Shimizu, Juichiro
Kubo, Yuichiro
Tabata, Nobuyuki
Aso, Tomohiko
author_facet Miyazaki, Yoshiaki
Shimizu, Juichiro
Kubo, Yuichiro
Tabata, Nobuyuki
Aso, Tomohiko
author_sort Miyazaki, Yoshiaki
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Breast cancers are classified as invasive or noninvasive based on histopathological findings. Although time-intensity curve (TIC) analysis using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can differentiate benign from malignant disease, its diagnostic ability to quantitatively distinguish between invasive and noninvasive breast cancers has not been determined. In this study, we evaluated the ability of TIC analysis of dynamic MRI data (MRI-TIC) to distinguish between invasive and noninvasive breast cancers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We collected and analyzed data for 429 cases of epithelial invasive and noninvasive breast carcinomas. TIC features were extracted in washout areas suggestive of malignancy. RESULTS: The graph determining the positive diagnosis rate for invasive and noninvasive cases revealed that the cut-off θ(i/ni) value was 21.6° (invasive: θ(w) > 21.6°, noninvasive: θ(w) ≤ 21.6°). Tissues were classified as invasive or noninvasive using this cut-off value, and each result was compared with the histopathological diagnosis. Using this method, the accuracy of tissue classification by MRI-TIC was 88.6% (380/429), which was higher than that using ultrasound (73.4%, 315/429). CONCLUSION: MRI-TIC is effective for the classification of invasive vs. noninvasive breast cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9479655
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Scientific Scholar
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94796552022-09-19 Quantitative classification of invasive and noninvasive breast cancer using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the mammary gland Miyazaki, Yoshiaki Shimizu, Juichiro Kubo, Yuichiro Tabata, Nobuyuki Aso, Tomohiko J Clin Imaging Sci Original Research OBJECTIVES: Breast cancers are classified as invasive or noninvasive based on histopathological findings. Although time-intensity curve (TIC) analysis using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can differentiate benign from malignant disease, its diagnostic ability to quantitatively distinguish between invasive and noninvasive breast cancers has not been determined. In this study, we evaluated the ability of TIC analysis of dynamic MRI data (MRI-TIC) to distinguish between invasive and noninvasive breast cancers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We collected and analyzed data for 429 cases of epithelial invasive and noninvasive breast carcinomas. TIC features were extracted in washout areas suggestive of malignancy. RESULTS: The graph determining the positive diagnosis rate for invasive and noninvasive cases revealed that the cut-off θ(i/ni) value was 21.6° (invasive: θ(w) > 21.6°, noninvasive: θ(w) ≤ 21.6°). Tissues were classified as invasive or noninvasive using this cut-off value, and each result was compared with the histopathological diagnosis. Using this method, the accuracy of tissue classification by MRI-TIC was 88.6% (380/429), which was higher than that using ultrasound (73.4%, 315/429). CONCLUSION: MRI-TIC is effective for the classification of invasive vs. noninvasive breast cancer. Scientific Scholar 2022-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9479655/ /pubmed/36128357 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/JCIS_56_2022 Text en © 2022 Published by Scientific Scholar on behalf of Journal of Clinical Imaging Science https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Research
Miyazaki, Yoshiaki
Shimizu, Juichiro
Kubo, Yuichiro
Tabata, Nobuyuki
Aso, Tomohiko
Quantitative classification of invasive and noninvasive breast cancer using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the mammary gland
title Quantitative classification of invasive and noninvasive breast cancer using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the mammary gland
title_full Quantitative classification of invasive and noninvasive breast cancer using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the mammary gland
title_fullStr Quantitative classification of invasive and noninvasive breast cancer using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the mammary gland
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative classification of invasive and noninvasive breast cancer using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the mammary gland
title_short Quantitative classification of invasive and noninvasive breast cancer using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the mammary gland
title_sort quantitative classification of invasive and noninvasive breast cancer using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the mammary gland
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9479655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36128357
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/JCIS_56_2022
work_keys_str_mv AT miyazakiyoshiaki quantitativeclassificationofinvasiveandnoninvasivebreastcancerusingdynamicmagneticresonanceimagingofthemammarygland
AT shimizujuichiro quantitativeclassificationofinvasiveandnoninvasivebreastcancerusingdynamicmagneticresonanceimagingofthemammarygland
AT kuboyuichiro quantitativeclassificationofinvasiveandnoninvasivebreastcancerusingdynamicmagneticresonanceimagingofthemammarygland
AT tabatanobuyuki quantitativeclassificationofinvasiveandnoninvasivebreastcancerusingdynamicmagneticresonanceimagingofthemammarygland
AT asotomohiko quantitativeclassificationofinvasiveandnoninvasivebreastcancerusingdynamicmagneticresonanceimagingofthemammarygland