Cargando…

A systematic evaluation of the computational tools for ligand-receptor-based cell–cell interaction inference

Cell–cell interactions (CCIs) are essential for multicellular organisms to coordinate biological processes and functions. One classical type of CCI interaction is between secreted ligands and cell surface receptors, i.e. ligand-receptor (LR) interactions. With the recent development of single-cell t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Saidi, Zheng, Hansi, Choi, James S, Lee, Jae K, Li, Xiaoman, Hu, Haiyan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9479691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35822343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bfgp/elac019
_version_ 1784790847474106368
author Wang, Saidi
Zheng, Hansi
Choi, James S
Lee, Jae K
Li, Xiaoman
Hu, Haiyan
author_facet Wang, Saidi
Zheng, Hansi
Choi, James S
Lee, Jae K
Li, Xiaoman
Hu, Haiyan
author_sort Wang, Saidi
collection PubMed
description Cell–cell interactions (CCIs) are essential for multicellular organisms to coordinate biological processes and functions. One classical type of CCI interaction is between secreted ligands and cell surface receptors, i.e. ligand-receptor (LR) interactions. With the recent development of single-cell technologies, a large amount of single-cell ribonucleic acid (RNA) sequencing (scRNA-Seq) data has become widely available. This data availability motivated the single-cell-resolution study of CCIs, particularly LR-based CCIs. Dozens of computational methods and tools have been developed to predict CCIs by identifying LR-based CCIs. Many of these tools have been theoretically reviewed. However, there is little study on current LR-based CCI prediction tools regarding their performance and running results on public scRNA-Seq datasets. In this work, to fill this gap, we tested and compared nine of the most recent computational tools for LR-based CCI prediction. We used 15 well-studied scRNA-Seq samples that correspond to approximately 100K single cells under different experimental conditions for testing and comparison. Besides briefing the methodology used in these nine tools, we summarized the similarities and differences of these tools in terms of both LR prediction and CCI inference between cell types. We provided insight into using these tools to make meaningful discoveries in understanding cell communications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9479691
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94796912022-09-20 A systematic evaluation of the computational tools for ligand-receptor-based cell–cell interaction inference Wang, Saidi Zheng, Hansi Choi, James S Lee, Jae K Li, Xiaoman Hu, Haiyan Brief Funct Genomics Review Paper Cell–cell interactions (CCIs) are essential for multicellular organisms to coordinate biological processes and functions. One classical type of CCI interaction is between secreted ligands and cell surface receptors, i.e. ligand-receptor (LR) interactions. With the recent development of single-cell technologies, a large amount of single-cell ribonucleic acid (RNA) sequencing (scRNA-Seq) data has become widely available. This data availability motivated the single-cell-resolution study of CCIs, particularly LR-based CCIs. Dozens of computational methods and tools have been developed to predict CCIs by identifying LR-based CCIs. Many of these tools have been theoretically reviewed. However, there is little study on current LR-based CCI prediction tools regarding their performance and running results on public scRNA-Seq datasets. In this work, to fill this gap, we tested and compared nine of the most recent computational tools for LR-based CCI prediction. We used 15 well-studied scRNA-Seq samples that correspond to approximately 100K single cells under different experimental conditions for testing and comparison. Besides briefing the methodology used in these nine tools, we summarized the similarities and differences of these tools in terms of both LR prediction and CCI inference between cell types. We provided insight into using these tools to make meaningful discoveries in understanding cell communications. Oxford University Press 2022-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9479691/ /pubmed/35822343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bfgp/elac019 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Review Paper
Wang, Saidi
Zheng, Hansi
Choi, James S
Lee, Jae K
Li, Xiaoman
Hu, Haiyan
A systematic evaluation of the computational tools for ligand-receptor-based cell–cell interaction inference
title A systematic evaluation of the computational tools for ligand-receptor-based cell–cell interaction inference
title_full A systematic evaluation of the computational tools for ligand-receptor-based cell–cell interaction inference
title_fullStr A systematic evaluation of the computational tools for ligand-receptor-based cell–cell interaction inference
title_full_unstemmed A systematic evaluation of the computational tools for ligand-receptor-based cell–cell interaction inference
title_short A systematic evaluation of the computational tools for ligand-receptor-based cell–cell interaction inference
title_sort systematic evaluation of the computational tools for ligand-receptor-based cell–cell interaction inference
topic Review Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9479691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35822343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bfgp/elac019
work_keys_str_mv AT wangsaidi asystematicevaluationofthecomputationaltoolsforligandreceptorbasedcellcellinteractioninference
AT zhenghansi asystematicevaluationofthecomputationaltoolsforligandreceptorbasedcellcellinteractioninference
AT choijamess asystematicevaluationofthecomputationaltoolsforligandreceptorbasedcellcellinteractioninference
AT leejaek asystematicevaluationofthecomputationaltoolsforligandreceptorbasedcellcellinteractioninference
AT lixiaoman asystematicevaluationofthecomputationaltoolsforligandreceptorbasedcellcellinteractioninference
AT huhaiyan asystematicevaluationofthecomputationaltoolsforligandreceptorbasedcellcellinteractioninference
AT wangsaidi systematicevaluationofthecomputationaltoolsforligandreceptorbasedcellcellinteractioninference
AT zhenghansi systematicevaluationofthecomputationaltoolsforligandreceptorbasedcellcellinteractioninference
AT choijamess systematicevaluationofthecomputationaltoolsforligandreceptorbasedcellcellinteractioninference
AT leejaek systematicevaluationofthecomputationaltoolsforligandreceptorbasedcellcellinteractioninference
AT lixiaoman systematicevaluationofthecomputationaltoolsforligandreceptorbasedcellcellinteractioninference
AT huhaiyan systematicevaluationofthecomputationaltoolsforligandreceptorbasedcellcellinteractioninference