Cargando…
A systematic evaluation of the computational tools for ligand-receptor-based cell–cell interaction inference
Cell–cell interactions (CCIs) are essential for multicellular organisms to coordinate biological processes and functions. One classical type of CCI interaction is between secreted ligands and cell surface receptors, i.e. ligand-receptor (LR) interactions. With the recent development of single-cell t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9479691/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35822343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bfgp/elac019 |
_version_ | 1784790847474106368 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Saidi Zheng, Hansi Choi, James S Lee, Jae K Li, Xiaoman Hu, Haiyan |
author_facet | Wang, Saidi Zheng, Hansi Choi, James S Lee, Jae K Li, Xiaoman Hu, Haiyan |
author_sort | Wang, Saidi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cell–cell interactions (CCIs) are essential for multicellular organisms to coordinate biological processes and functions. One classical type of CCI interaction is between secreted ligands and cell surface receptors, i.e. ligand-receptor (LR) interactions. With the recent development of single-cell technologies, a large amount of single-cell ribonucleic acid (RNA) sequencing (scRNA-Seq) data has become widely available. This data availability motivated the single-cell-resolution study of CCIs, particularly LR-based CCIs. Dozens of computational methods and tools have been developed to predict CCIs by identifying LR-based CCIs. Many of these tools have been theoretically reviewed. However, there is little study on current LR-based CCI prediction tools regarding their performance and running results on public scRNA-Seq datasets. In this work, to fill this gap, we tested and compared nine of the most recent computational tools for LR-based CCI prediction. We used 15 well-studied scRNA-Seq samples that correspond to approximately 100K single cells under different experimental conditions for testing and comparison. Besides briefing the methodology used in these nine tools, we summarized the similarities and differences of these tools in terms of both LR prediction and CCI inference between cell types. We provided insight into using these tools to make meaningful discoveries in understanding cell communications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9479691 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94796912022-09-20 A systematic evaluation of the computational tools for ligand-receptor-based cell–cell interaction inference Wang, Saidi Zheng, Hansi Choi, James S Lee, Jae K Li, Xiaoman Hu, Haiyan Brief Funct Genomics Review Paper Cell–cell interactions (CCIs) are essential for multicellular organisms to coordinate biological processes and functions. One classical type of CCI interaction is between secreted ligands and cell surface receptors, i.e. ligand-receptor (LR) interactions. With the recent development of single-cell technologies, a large amount of single-cell ribonucleic acid (RNA) sequencing (scRNA-Seq) data has become widely available. This data availability motivated the single-cell-resolution study of CCIs, particularly LR-based CCIs. Dozens of computational methods and tools have been developed to predict CCIs by identifying LR-based CCIs. Many of these tools have been theoretically reviewed. However, there is little study on current LR-based CCI prediction tools regarding their performance and running results on public scRNA-Seq datasets. In this work, to fill this gap, we tested and compared nine of the most recent computational tools for LR-based CCI prediction. We used 15 well-studied scRNA-Seq samples that correspond to approximately 100K single cells under different experimental conditions for testing and comparison. Besides briefing the methodology used in these nine tools, we summarized the similarities and differences of these tools in terms of both LR prediction and CCI inference between cell types. We provided insight into using these tools to make meaningful discoveries in understanding cell communications. Oxford University Press 2022-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9479691/ /pubmed/35822343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bfgp/elac019 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Review Paper Wang, Saidi Zheng, Hansi Choi, James S Lee, Jae K Li, Xiaoman Hu, Haiyan A systematic evaluation of the computational tools for ligand-receptor-based cell–cell interaction inference |
title | A systematic evaluation of the computational tools for ligand-receptor-based cell–cell interaction inference |
title_full | A systematic evaluation of the computational tools for ligand-receptor-based cell–cell interaction inference |
title_fullStr | A systematic evaluation of the computational tools for ligand-receptor-based cell–cell interaction inference |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic evaluation of the computational tools for ligand-receptor-based cell–cell interaction inference |
title_short | A systematic evaluation of the computational tools for ligand-receptor-based cell–cell interaction inference |
title_sort | systematic evaluation of the computational tools for ligand-receptor-based cell–cell interaction inference |
topic | Review Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9479691/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35822343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bfgp/elac019 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangsaidi asystematicevaluationofthecomputationaltoolsforligandreceptorbasedcellcellinteractioninference AT zhenghansi asystematicevaluationofthecomputationaltoolsforligandreceptorbasedcellcellinteractioninference AT choijamess asystematicevaluationofthecomputationaltoolsforligandreceptorbasedcellcellinteractioninference AT leejaek asystematicevaluationofthecomputationaltoolsforligandreceptorbasedcellcellinteractioninference AT lixiaoman asystematicevaluationofthecomputationaltoolsforligandreceptorbasedcellcellinteractioninference AT huhaiyan asystematicevaluationofthecomputationaltoolsforligandreceptorbasedcellcellinteractioninference AT wangsaidi systematicevaluationofthecomputationaltoolsforligandreceptorbasedcellcellinteractioninference AT zhenghansi systematicevaluationofthecomputationaltoolsforligandreceptorbasedcellcellinteractioninference AT choijamess systematicevaluationofthecomputationaltoolsforligandreceptorbasedcellcellinteractioninference AT leejaek systematicevaluationofthecomputationaltoolsforligandreceptorbasedcellcellinteractioninference AT lixiaoman systematicevaluationofthecomputationaltoolsforligandreceptorbasedcellcellinteractioninference AT huhaiyan systematicevaluationofthecomputationaltoolsforligandreceptorbasedcellcellinteractioninference |