Cargando…

Standardized training in the rating of the six-item positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS-6)

INTRODUCTION: The six-item Positive And Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS-6) is short psychometric valid scale quantifying the severity of core schizophrenia symptoms. Using PANSS-6 to guide treatment decision-making requires that staff members’ ratings are valid and reliable. OBJECTIVES: The objective...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kølbæk, P., Dines, D., Hansen, J., Opler, M., Correll, C., Mors, O., Østergaard, S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9479920/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.1580
_version_ 1784790903907418112
author Kølbæk, P.
Dines, D.
Hansen, J.
Opler, M.
Correll, C.
Mors, O.
Østergaard, S.
author_facet Kølbæk, P.
Dines, D.
Hansen, J.
Opler, M.
Correll, C.
Mors, O.
Østergaard, S.
author_sort Kølbæk, P.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The six-item Positive And Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS-6) is short psychometric valid scale quantifying the severity of core schizophrenia symptoms. Using PANSS-6 to guide treatment decision-making requires that staff members’ ratings are valid and reliable. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to evaluate whether such valid and reliable PANSS-6 ratings can be obtained through a video-based training program. METHODS: One-hundred-and-four staff members from Aarhus University Hospital - Psychiatry, Denmark participated in the training. Participants conducted baseline PANSS-6 ratings based on a video of a patient being interviewed using the Simplified Positive And Negative Symptoms interview (SNAPSI). Subsequently, a theoretical introduction video was displayed followed by five SNAPSI patient interviews. After each SNAPSI video, individual ratings were performed before a video providing the gold standard scores was displayed. The validity of ratings was estimated by calculating the proportion of participants not deviating from the gold standard scores with >2 points on individual items or >6 points on the PANSS-6 total score. Reliability was evaluated after each step in the training by means of Gwet’s Agreement Coefficient (Gwet). RESULTS: By the end of the training, 72% of the participants rated within the acceptable deviations of the gold standard, ranging from 60% (nurses) to 91% (medical doctors/psychologists). The reliability improved (Gwet baseline vs. endpoint) for all PANSS-6 items, except for Blunted affect. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of the staff members conducted valid PANSS-6 ratings after a brief standardized training program, supporting the implementation of PANSS-6 in clinical settings to facilitate measurement-based care. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Dr. Opler is a full-time employee of MedAvante-ProPhase Inc. Dr. Correll has been a consultant and/or advisor to or have received honoraria from: Acadia, Alkermes, Allergan, Angelini, Axsome, Gedeon Richter, Gerson Lehrman Group, Indivior, IntraCellular T
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9479920
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94799202022-09-29 Standardized training in the rating of the six-item positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS-6) Kølbæk, P. Dines, D. Hansen, J. Opler, M. Correll, C. Mors, O. Østergaard, S. Eur Psychiatry Abstract INTRODUCTION: The six-item Positive And Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS-6) is short psychometric valid scale quantifying the severity of core schizophrenia symptoms. Using PANSS-6 to guide treatment decision-making requires that staff members’ ratings are valid and reliable. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to evaluate whether such valid and reliable PANSS-6 ratings can be obtained through a video-based training program. METHODS: One-hundred-and-four staff members from Aarhus University Hospital - Psychiatry, Denmark participated in the training. Participants conducted baseline PANSS-6 ratings based on a video of a patient being interviewed using the Simplified Positive And Negative Symptoms interview (SNAPSI). Subsequently, a theoretical introduction video was displayed followed by five SNAPSI patient interviews. After each SNAPSI video, individual ratings were performed before a video providing the gold standard scores was displayed. The validity of ratings was estimated by calculating the proportion of participants not deviating from the gold standard scores with >2 points on individual items or >6 points on the PANSS-6 total score. Reliability was evaluated after each step in the training by means of Gwet’s Agreement Coefficient (Gwet). RESULTS: By the end of the training, 72% of the participants rated within the acceptable deviations of the gold standard, ranging from 60% (nurses) to 91% (medical doctors/psychologists). The reliability improved (Gwet baseline vs. endpoint) for all PANSS-6 items, except for Blunted affect. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of the staff members conducted valid PANSS-6 ratings after a brief standardized training program, supporting the implementation of PANSS-6 in clinical settings to facilitate measurement-based care. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Dr. Opler is a full-time employee of MedAvante-ProPhase Inc. Dr. Correll has been a consultant and/or advisor to or have received honoraria from: Acadia, Alkermes, Allergan, Angelini, Axsome, Gedeon Richter, Gerson Lehrman Group, Indivior, IntraCellular T Cambridge University Press 2021-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9479920/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.1580 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Kølbæk, P.
Dines, D.
Hansen, J.
Opler, M.
Correll, C.
Mors, O.
Østergaard, S.
Standardized training in the rating of the six-item positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS-6)
title Standardized training in the rating of the six-item positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS-6)
title_full Standardized training in the rating of the six-item positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS-6)
title_fullStr Standardized training in the rating of the six-item positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS-6)
title_full_unstemmed Standardized training in the rating of the six-item positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS-6)
title_short Standardized training in the rating of the six-item positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS-6)
title_sort standardized training in the rating of the six-item positive and negative syndrome scale (panss-6)
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9479920/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.1580
work_keys_str_mv AT kølbækp standardizedtrainingintheratingofthesixitempositiveandnegativesyndromescalepanss6
AT dinesd standardizedtrainingintheratingofthesixitempositiveandnegativesyndromescalepanss6
AT hansenj standardizedtrainingintheratingofthesixitempositiveandnegativesyndromescalepanss6
AT oplerm standardizedtrainingintheratingofthesixitempositiveandnegativesyndromescalepanss6
AT correllc standardizedtrainingintheratingofthesixitempositiveandnegativesyndromescalepanss6
AT morso standardizedtrainingintheratingofthesixitempositiveandnegativesyndromescalepanss6
AT østergaards standardizedtrainingintheratingofthesixitempositiveandnegativesyndromescalepanss6