Cargando…
Standardized training in the rating of the six-item positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS-6)
INTRODUCTION: The six-item Positive And Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS-6) is short psychometric valid scale quantifying the severity of core schizophrenia symptoms. Using PANSS-6 to guide treatment decision-making requires that staff members’ ratings are valid and reliable. OBJECTIVES: The objective...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9479920/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.1580 |
_version_ | 1784790903907418112 |
---|---|
author | Kølbæk, P. Dines, D. Hansen, J. Opler, M. Correll, C. Mors, O. Østergaard, S. |
author_facet | Kølbæk, P. Dines, D. Hansen, J. Opler, M. Correll, C. Mors, O. Østergaard, S. |
author_sort | Kølbæk, P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The six-item Positive And Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS-6) is short psychometric valid scale quantifying the severity of core schizophrenia symptoms. Using PANSS-6 to guide treatment decision-making requires that staff members’ ratings are valid and reliable. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to evaluate whether such valid and reliable PANSS-6 ratings can be obtained through a video-based training program. METHODS: One-hundred-and-four staff members from Aarhus University Hospital - Psychiatry, Denmark participated in the training. Participants conducted baseline PANSS-6 ratings based on a video of a patient being interviewed using the Simplified Positive And Negative Symptoms interview (SNAPSI). Subsequently, a theoretical introduction video was displayed followed by five SNAPSI patient interviews. After each SNAPSI video, individual ratings were performed before a video providing the gold standard scores was displayed. The validity of ratings was estimated by calculating the proportion of participants not deviating from the gold standard scores with >2 points on individual items or >6 points on the PANSS-6 total score. Reliability was evaluated after each step in the training by means of Gwet’s Agreement Coefficient (Gwet). RESULTS: By the end of the training, 72% of the participants rated within the acceptable deviations of the gold standard, ranging from 60% (nurses) to 91% (medical doctors/psychologists). The reliability improved (Gwet baseline vs. endpoint) for all PANSS-6 items, except for Blunted affect. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of the staff members conducted valid PANSS-6 ratings after a brief standardized training program, supporting the implementation of PANSS-6 in clinical settings to facilitate measurement-based care. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Dr. Opler is a full-time employee of MedAvante-ProPhase Inc. Dr. Correll has been a consultant and/or advisor to or have received honoraria from: Acadia, Alkermes, Allergan, Angelini, Axsome, Gedeon Richter, Gerson Lehrman Group, Indivior, IntraCellular T |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9479920 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94799202022-09-29 Standardized training in the rating of the six-item positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS-6) Kølbæk, P. Dines, D. Hansen, J. Opler, M. Correll, C. Mors, O. Østergaard, S. Eur Psychiatry Abstract INTRODUCTION: The six-item Positive And Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS-6) is short psychometric valid scale quantifying the severity of core schizophrenia symptoms. Using PANSS-6 to guide treatment decision-making requires that staff members’ ratings are valid and reliable. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to evaluate whether such valid and reliable PANSS-6 ratings can be obtained through a video-based training program. METHODS: One-hundred-and-four staff members from Aarhus University Hospital - Psychiatry, Denmark participated in the training. Participants conducted baseline PANSS-6 ratings based on a video of a patient being interviewed using the Simplified Positive And Negative Symptoms interview (SNAPSI). Subsequently, a theoretical introduction video was displayed followed by five SNAPSI patient interviews. After each SNAPSI video, individual ratings were performed before a video providing the gold standard scores was displayed. The validity of ratings was estimated by calculating the proportion of participants not deviating from the gold standard scores with >2 points on individual items or >6 points on the PANSS-6 total score. Reliability was evaluated after each step in the training by means of Gwet’s Agreement Coefficient (Gwet). RESULTS: By the end of the training, 72% of the participants rated within the acceptable deviations of the gold standard, ranging from 60% (nurses) to 91% (medical doctors/psychologists). The reliability improved (Gwet baseline vs. endpoint) for all PANSS-6 items, except for Blunted affect. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of the staff members conducted valid PANSS-6 ratings after a brief standardized training program, supporting the implementation of PANSS-6 in clinical settings to facilitate measurement-based care. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Dr. Opler is a full-time employee of MedAvante-ProPhase Inc. Dr. Correll has been a consultant and/or advisor to or have received honoraria from: Acadia, Alkermes, Allergan, Angelini, Axsome, Gedeon Richter, Gerson Lehrman Group, Indivior, IntraCellular T Cambridge University Press 2021-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9479920/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.1580 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Abstract Kølbæk, P. Dines, D. Hansen, J. Opler, M. Correll, C. Mors, O. Østergaard, S. Standardized training in the rating of the six-item positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS-6) |
title | Standardized training in the rating of the six-item positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS-6) |
title_full | Standardized training in the rating of the six-item positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS-6) |
title_fullStr | Standardized training in the rating of the six-item positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS-6) |
title_full_unstemmed | Standardized training in the rating of the six-item positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS-6) |
title_short | Standardized training in the rating of the six-item positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS-6) |
title_sort | standardized training in the rating of the six-item positive and negative syndrome scale (panss-6) |
topic | Abstract |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9479920/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.1580 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kølbækp standardizedtrainingintheratingofthesixitempositiveandnegativesyndromescalepanss6 AT dinesd standardizedtrainingintheratingofthesixitempositiveandnegativesyndromescalepanss6 AT hansenj standardizedtrainingintheratingofthesixitempositiveandnegativesyndromescalepanss6 AT oplerm standardizedtrainingintheratingofthesixitempositiveandnegativesyndromescalepanss6 AT correllc standardizedtrainingintheratingofthesixitempositiveandnegativesyndromescalepanss6 AT morso standardizedtrainingintheratingofthesixitempositiveandnegativesyndromescalepanss6 AT østergaards standardizedtrainingintheratingofthesixitempositiveandnegativesyndromescalepanss6 |