Cargando…

A mixed methods evaluation of the current state of perinatal mental healthcare and users’ acceptability of a digital assessment for perinatal mental health

INTRODUCTION: Perinatal mental health symptoms commonly remain underdiagnosed in maternity care settings in the UK, with the COVID-19 pandemic having further disrupted access to adequate care provision. Digital technologies may offer innovative ways to support the mental health needs of women and pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spadaro, B., Martin-Key, N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9480047/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.1845
_version_ 1784790957416251392
author Spadaro, B.
Martin-Key, N.
author_facet Spadaro, B.
Martin-Key, N.
author_sort Spadaro, B.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Perinatal mental health symptoms commonly remain underdiagnosed in maternity care settings in the UK, with the COVID-19 pandemic having further disrupted access to adequate care provision. Digital technologies may offer innovative ways to support the mental health needs of women and partners and assist midwives in recognition of concerns. OBJECTIVES: We set to investigate the current state of perinatal mental healthcare provision in the UK and the acceptability of a digital mental health assessment. METHODS: The study entailed completing an online survey. 829 women, 103 partners, and 90 midwives participated in the study. Quantitative data were explored using descriptive statistics. Open-ended responses regarding the perceived benefits and barriers to using a digital mental health assessment were investigated using thematic analysis. Resultant themes were then mapped onto the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation Model of Behaviour (COM-B model). RESULTS: The provision of perinatal mental healthcare support was limited and varied across respondents, particularly throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. There was a strong interest in using a digital mental health assessment placed within maternity healthcare settings to screen, diagnose, and triage concerns (Figure 1). In-person and blended care approaches (i.e., in-person and remote support) were preferred by women and partners in the event of further care being advised (Figure 1). Identified barriers and benefits mainly related to physical opportunity (e.g., accessibility), psychological capability (e.g., cognitive skills) and automatic motivation (e.g., emotions). [Figure: see text] CONCLUSIONS: This study provides proof-of-concept support for the development of a digital mental health assessment to inform clinical decision-making for perinatal mental health concerns. DISCLOSURE: NMK has financial interest in Psyomics Ltd., a company developing digital diagnostic devices for neuropsychiatric disorders.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9480047
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94800472022-09-29 A mixed methods evaluation of the current state of perinatal mental healthcare and users’ acceptability of a digital assessment for perinatal mental health Spadaro, B. Martin-Key, N. Eur Psychiatry Abstract INTRODUCTION: Perinatal mental health symptoms commonly remain underdiagnosed in maternity care settings in the UK, with the COVID-19 pandemic having further disrupted access to adequate care provision. Digital technologies may offer innovative ways to support the mental health needs of women and partners and assist midwives in recognition of concerns. OBJECTIVES: We set to investigate the current state of perinatal mental healthcare provision in the UK and the acceptability of a digital mental health assessment. METHODS: The study entailed completing an online survey. 829 women, 103 partners, and 90 midwives participated in the study. Quantitative data were explored using descriptive statistics. Open-ended responses regarding the perceived benefits and barriers to using a digital mental health assessment were investigated using thematic analysis. Resultant themes were then mapped onto the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation Model of Behaviour (COM-B model). RESULTS: The provision of perinatal mental healthcare support was limited and varied across respondents, particularly throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. There was a strong interest in using a digital mental health assessment placed within maternity healthcare settings to screen, diagnose, and triage concerns (Figure 1). In-person and blended care approaches (i.e., in-person and remote support) were preferred by women and partners in the event of further care being advised (Figure 1). Identified barriers and benefits mainly related to physical opportunity (e.g., accessibility), psychological capability (e.g., cognitive skills) and automatic motivation (e.g., emotions). [Figure: see text] CONCLUSIONS: This study provides proof-of-concept support for the development of a digital mental health assessment to inform clinical decision-making for perinatal mental health concerns. DISCLOSURE: NMK has financial interest in Psyomics Ltd., a company developing digital diagnostic devices for neuropsychiatric disorders. Cambridge University Press 2021-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9480047/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.1845 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Spadaro, B.
Martin-Key, N.
A mixed methods evaluation of the current state of perinatal mental healthcare and users’ acceptability of a digital assessment for perinatal mental health
title A mixed methods evaluation of the current state of perinatal mental healthcare and users’ acceptability of a digital assessment for perinatal mental health
title_full A mixed methods evaluation of the current state of perinatal mental healthcare and users’ acceptability of a digital assessment for perinatal mental health
title_fullStr A mixed methods evaluation of the current state of perinatal mental healthcare and users’ acceptability of a digital assessment for perinatal mental health
title_full_unstemmed A mixed methods evaluation of the current state of perinatal mental healthcare and users’ acceptability of a digital assessment for perinatal mental health
title_short A mixed methods evaluation of the current state of perinatal mental healthcare and users’ acceptability of a digital assessment for perinatal mental health
title_sort mixed methods evaluation of the current state of perinatal mental healthcare and users’ acceptability of a digital assessment for perinatal mental health
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9480047/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.1845
work_keys_str_mv AT spadarob amixedmethodsevaluationofthecurrentstateofperinatalmentalhealthcareandusersacceptabilityofadigitalassessmentforperinatalmentalhealth
AT martinkeyn amixedmethodsevaluationofthecurrentstateofperinatalmentalhealthcareandusersacceptabilityofadigitalassessmentforperinatalmentalhealth
AT spadarob mixedmethodsevaluationofthecurrentstateofperinatalmentalhealthcareandusersacceptabilityofadigitalassessmentforperinatalmentalhealth
AT martinkeyn mixedmethodsevaluationofthecurrentstateofperinatalmentalhealthcareandusersacceptabilityofadigitalassessmentforperinatalmentalhealth