Cargando…

Psychological induction of the child: Cognitive, emotional and behavioral diagnostic markers

INTRODUCTION: One of the tasks of the forensic assessment of family disputes is to establish the fact that a child is set up by one parent against another. OBJECTIVES: Identification of diagnostic markers of psychological induced state in a child due to purposeful actions of a parent living together...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Kalashnikova, A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9480173/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.1897
_version_ 1784790990954954752
author Kalashnikova, A.
author_facet Kalashnikova, A.
author_sort Kalashnikova, A.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: One of the tasks of the forensic assessment of family disputes is to establish the fact that a child is set up by one parent against another. OBJECTIVES: Identification of diagnostic markers of psychological induced state in a child due to purposeful actions of a parent living together with him. METHODS: A continuous one-step analysis of the results of forensic assessments on family disputes was carried out in respect of 48 girls and 67 boys aged 3 to 15 years (mean age 7.9 ± 4.5 years). The objective materials presented by the court were analyzed in comparison with the results of a structured interview. The statistical significance of any differences were evaluated using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney (U). RESULTS: Persistent negative attitude to one of the parents was found in 14% of children. Markers of the induced state at the cognitive level were identified: negative semantic attitudes (U=477.1; p=0.014), distorted image of the rejected parent (U=509.5; p=0.023), transformation of memories (U=389.5; p=0.001). At the emotional level: persistent negative attitude to one of the parents when idealizing the second (U=371.1; p=0.001), emotional involvement of the child in the family conflict (U=556.6; p=0.048). At the behavioral level: declaring a stable set of stereotypical “adult” phrases (U=387.3; p=0.001), regressive behaviors and manifestations of stress in the presence of a rejected parent (U=601.5; p=0.04). Markers on all three levels must co-exist. CONCLUSIONS: There are diagnostic markers of the induced state in a child, which verify the forensic conclusion about the negative impact on his mental state of the parent-inducer. DISCLOSURE: No significant relationships.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9480173
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94801732022-09-29 Psychological induction of the child: Cognitive, emotional and behavioral diagnostic markers Kalashnikova, A. Eur Psychiatry Abstract INTRODUCTION: One of the tasks of the forensic assessment of family disputes is to establish the fact that a child is set up by one parent against another. OBJECTIVES: Identification of diagnostic markers of psychological induced state in a child due to purposeful actions of a parent living together with him. METHODS: A continuous one-step analysis of the results of forensic assessments on family disputes was carried out in respect of 48 girls and 67 boys aged 3 to 15 years (mean age 7.9 ± 4.5 years). The objective materials presented by the court were analyzed in comparison with the results of a structured interview. The statistical significance of any differences were evaluated using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney (U). RESULTS: Persistent negative attitude to one of the parents was found in 14% of children. Markers of the induced state at the cognitive level were identified: negative semantic attitudes (U=477.1; p=0.014), distorted image of the rejected parent (U=509.5; p=0.023), transformation of memories (U=389.5; p=0.001). At the emotional level: persistent negative attitude to one of the parents when idealizing the second (U=371.1; p=0.001), emotional involvement of the child in the family conflict (U=556.6; p=0.048). At the behavioral level: declaring a stable set of stereotypical “adult” phrases (U=387.3; p=0.001), regressive behaviors and manifestations of stress in the presence of a rejected parent (U=601.5; p=0.04). Markers on all three levels must co-exist. CONCLUSIONS: There are diagnostic markers of the induced state in a child, which verify the forensic conclusion about the negative impact on his mental state of the parent-inducer. DISCLOSURE: No significant relationships. Cambridge University Press 2021-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9480173/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.1897 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Kalashnikova, A.
Psychological induction of the child: Cognitive, emotional and behavioral diagnostic markers
title Psychological induction of the child: Cognitive, emotional and behavioral diagnostic markers
title_full Psychological induction of the child: Cognitive, emotional and behavioral diagnostic markers
title_fullStr Psychological induction of the child: Cognitive, emotional and behavioral diagnostic markers
title_full_unstemmed Psychological induction of the child: Cognitive, emotional and behavioral diagnostic markers
title_short Psychological induction of the child: Cognitive, emotional and behavioral diagnostic markers
title_sort psychological induction of the child: cognitive, emotional and behavioral diagnostic markers
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9480173/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.1897
work_keys_str_mv AT kalashnikovaa psychologicalinductionofthechildcognitiveemotionalandbehavioraldiagnosticmarkers