Cargando…

Can social media be beneficial for eating disorders?

INTRODUCTION: Eating Disorders are a frequent pathology, particularly among teenagers, a group characterized by its vulnerability and body dissatisfaction. Social networks (SN) can be a gateway to ED, mainly with Pro-Ana and Pro-Mia resources. Despite the aforementioned, SN can also be helpful for p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jordan, G. Lladó, García, M.D.C. Díaz, Cano, M. Miguel, Cubo, M. Jiménez, Díez, B. Lozano, Martín, A. Santos, Esteban, P. Sánchez, Sánchez, P. Mediavilla, Del Barrio, J.A. Gómez, Ayesa-Arriola, R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9480255/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.1861
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: Eating Disorders are a frequent pathology, particularly among teenagers, a group characterized by its vulnerability and body dissatisfaction. Social networks (SN) can be a gateway to ED, mainly with Pro-Ana and Pro-Mia resources. Despite the aforementioned, SN can also be helpful for professionals, either as a tool of approach to vulnerable groups or as a way of interaction in patients already diagnosed. OBJECTIVES: To study the relationship between ED and SN, using the open access evidence available in Pubmed over the last 5 years. METHODS: A single-phase computerised search was carried out in Pubmed. The search terms were: (“Anorexia Nervosa”[Mesh] OR “Bulimia Nervosa”[Mesh] OR “Feeding and Eating Disorders”[Mesh] OR “Eating Disorders”[Tiab] OR “Eating Disorder”[Tiab] OR “Disorder, Eating”[Tiab] OR “Disorders, Eating”[Tiab] OR “Anorexia”[Tiab] OR “Bulimia”[Tiab]) AND (“blogging”[Mesh] OR “social media”[Mesh]). The filters applied were: “free Full Text” and publications for the last 5 years. RESULTS: 36.84% studied SN as a positive tool for ED. 47.37% revealed negative influence, only 44.44% focused on Pro-Ana and Pro-Mia. 15.79% provided both positive and negative arguments. The most studied SN were Twitter and Facebook. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the known negative effect that SN can have on ED, they can also be used as a supportive recovery framework. They can be used to identify dangerous behaviours and intervene or as a prevention tool. DISCLOSURE: No significant relationships.