Cargando…

Testing the clinical application of the child psychosis-risk screening system (CPSS)

INTRODUCTION: Children in a prodromal state manifesting as truancy or social isolation (hikikomori) often complain of problems that are physical in nature and are subject to significant changes. We developed the Child Psychosis-Risk Screening System (CPSS) that incorporates childhood psycho-behavior...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hamasaki, Y., Matsuo, M., Sakaue, Y., Sanada, R., Nakayama, T., Michikoshi, S., Ueba, S., Kurimoto, N., Hikida, T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9480262/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.1694
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: Children in a prodromal state manifesting as truancy or social isolation (hikikomori) often complain of problems that are physical in nature and are subject to significant changes. We developed the Child Psychosis-Risk Screening System (CPSS) that incorporates childhood psycho-behavioral characteristics revealed through a retrospective survey of schizophrenia patients into its algorithm. OBJECTIVES: Our research aimed to test the risk identification of pediatric and psychiatric clinic outpatients using the CPSS. METHODS: We conducted an epidemiological study involving 204 outpatients between the ages of 6 and 14 years who had been examined at a pediatric or psychiatric clinic using the CBCL and clinical data from medical charts. Logistic regression analysis and T-tests were performed using each clinical data variable to clarify the risk of the CPSS calculated from the CBCL data and contributing factors. RESULTS: The results of the logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the diagnostic category (physical illness or DSM-5 diagnosis) and chief complaint did not contribute to differentiate between the high-risk and low-risk groups. Meanwhile, the environmental factors of “abuse” and “social isolation” did contribute to the discrimination of the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The fact that the diagnostic category during childhood does not contribute to the discrimination of the high- risk group warrants attention. It is possible that the high-risk group only had a latent endophenotype that had not yet manifested during this period. The factors suggested to have an association with the high-risk group may be reflecting activators and the dynamic state of the critical period for psychosis. DISCLOSURE: No significant relationships.