Cargando…
Photorefractive Keratectomy Enhancement (PRK) After Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE)
PURPOSE: To determine rates of enhancement and visual prognosis following photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) enhancement of small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective, single-site study reviewed all cases of primary SMILE at Hoopes Vision in Draper, Utah bet...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9480579/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36119391 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S381319 |
_version_ | 1784791066725056512 |
---|---|
author | Moshirfar, Majid Parsons, Mark T Chartrand, Nicholas A Lau, Chap-Kay Stapley, Seth Bundogji, Nour Ronquillo, Yasmyne C Hoopes, Phillip C |
author_facet | Moshirfar, Majid Parsons, Mark T Chartrand, Nicholas A Lau, Chap-Kay Stapley, Seth Bundogji, Nour Ronquillo, Yasmyne C Hoopes, Phillip C |
author_sort | Moshirfar, Majid |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To determine rates of enhancement and visual prognosis following photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) enhancement of small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective, single-site study reviewed all cases of primary SMILE at Hoopes Vision in Draper, Utah between March 14, 2017 and April 8, 2022 to identify any cases that required follow-up enhancement. Primary SMILE was performed using Visumax 500 kHz femtosecond laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany). All enhancements were performed with alcohol-assisted PRK, using a WaveLight EX500 excimer laser (Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX). RESULTS: Four hundred and five eyes underwent primary SMILE, of which 15 later underwent PRK enhancement (enhancement rate of 3.7%). No significant difference in pre-SMILE data was identified between the enhancement and non-enhancement groups. The average age of those who underwent PRK enhancement was 33.8±6.3 years old and ranged from 25 to 45. Following primary SMILE, 13 eyes (87%) had an uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) of 20/40 or better, and none had a UDVA of 20/20 or better. After one year of post-enhancement follow-up, all eyes had a UDVA of 20/40 or better, and 13 eyes (87%) had a UDVA of 20/20 or better (Figure 1). All were within one diopter of target spherical equivalent (SEQ), 13 (87%) were within 0.50 D, and 10 (67%) were within 0.25 D. Of those with 12-month follow-up data, none had UDVA worse than corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and none had lost lines of CDVA. Efficacy and safety indices were 1.03 and 0.99, respectively. CONCLUSION: Following SMILE, ophthalmologists may anticipate an enhancement rate of one to seven percent. In these cases, PRK is a safe and effective procedure for enhancement of SMILE. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9480579 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94805792022-09-17 Photorefractive Keratectomy Enhancement (PRK) After Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) Moshirfar, Majid Parsons, Mark T Chartrand, Nicholas A Lau, Chap-Kay Stapley, Seth Bundogji, Nour Ronquillo, Yasmyne C Hoopes, Phillip C Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: To determine rates of enhancement and visual prognosis following photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) enhancement of small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective, single-site study reviewed all cases of primary SMILE at Hoopes Vision in Draper, Utah between March 14, 2017 and April 8, 2022 to identify any cases that required follow-up enhancement. Primary SMILE was performed using Visumax 500 kHz femtosecond laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany). All enhancements were performed with alcohol-assisted PRK, using a WaveLight EX500 excimer laser (Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX). RESULTS: Four hundred and five eyes underwent primary SMILE, of which 15 later underwent PRK enhancement (enhancement rate of 3.7%). No significant difference in pre-SMILE data was identified between the enhancement and non-enhancement groups. The average age of those who underwent PRK enhancement was 33.8±6.3 years old and ranged from 25 to 45. Following primary SMILE, 13 eyes (87%) had an uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) of 20/40 or better, and none had a UDVA of 20/20 or better. After one year of post-enhancement follow-up, all eyes had a UDVA of 20/40 or better, and 13 eyes (87%) had a UDVA of 20/20 or better (Figure 1). All were within one diopter of target spherical equivalent (SEQ), 13 (87%) were within 0.50 D, and 10 (67%) were within 0.25 D. Of those with 12-month follow-up data, none had UDVA worse than corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and none had lost lines of CDVA. Efficacy and safety indices were 1.03 and 0.99, respectively. CONCLUSION: Following SMILE, ophthalmologists may anticipate an enhancement rate of one to seven percent. In these cases, PRK is a safe and effective procedure for enhancement of SMILE. Dove 2022-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9480579/ /pubmed/36119391 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S381319 Text en © 2022 Moshirfar et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Moshirfar, Majid Parsons, Mark T Chartrand, Nicholas A Lau, Chap-Kay Stapley, Seth Bundogji, Nour Ronquillo, Yasmyne C Hoopes, Phillip C Photorefractive Keratectomy Enhancement (PRK) After Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) |
title | Photorefractive Keratectomy Enhancement (PRK) After Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) |
title_full | Photorefractive Keratectomy Enhancement (PRK) After Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) |
title_fullStr | Photorefractive Keratectomy Enhancement (PRK) After Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) |
title_full_unstemmed | Photorefractive Keratectomy Enhancement (PRK) After Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) |
title_short | Photorefractive Keratectomy Enhancement (PRK) After Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) |
title_sort | photorefractive keratectomy enhancement (prk) after small-incision lenticule extraction (smile) |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9480579/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36119391 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S381319 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moshirfarmajid photorefractivekeratectomyenhancementprkaftersmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmile AT parsonsmarkt photorefractivekeratectomyenhancementprkaftersmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmile AT chartrandnicholasa photorefractivekeratectomyenhancementprkaftersmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmile AT lauchapkay photorefractivekeratectomyenhancementprkaftersmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmile AT stapleyseth photorefractivekeratectomyenhancementprkaftersmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmile AT bundogjinour photorefractivekeratectomyenhancementprkaftersmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmile AT ronquilloyasmynec photorefractivekeratectomyenhancementprkaftersmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmile AT hoopesphillipc photorefractivekeratectomyenhancementprkaftersmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmile |