Cargando…

Home-based telemental health services for Indian patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: A comparison with the pre-COVID phase

BACKGROUND: Many developed countries have switched from conventional outpatient psychiatric services to tele mental health-based alternatives because of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, similar transitions might be difficult for countries like India because of a shortage of necessary resources. There...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chakravarty, Rahul, Chakrabarti, Subho, Shah, Ruchita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9480689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36119313
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1644_21
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Many developed countries have switched from conventional outpatient psychiatric services to tele mental health-based alternatives because of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, similar transitions might be difficult for countries like India because of a shortage of necessary resources. Therefore, the feasibility and acceptability of converting to a home-based tele mental health (HB-TMH) service during the pandemic were examined in an Indian hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A new and expanded version of an HB-TMH service was operated for all outpatients following the onset of the pandemic. Feasibility outcomes included operational viability, service utilization, service engagement, the need for additional in-person services, and the frequency of adverse events. Patients’ and clinicians’ satisfaction with different aspects of the service were evaluated using Likert-style questionnaires to ascertain acceptability. The outcomes during the prepandemic and pandemic phases were also compared. RESULTS: The switch to HB-TMH services took 6 weeks during the pandemic. Patient numbers increased greatly following this transition. Attendance improved, the requirement for in-person services was low, and no serious adverse events were reported. However, patients’ satisfaction levels were relatively low during the pandemic. Clinicians were more satisfied than the patients with HB-TMH treatment during the pandemic. Differences between them were less marked but still present before the pandemic. Pre- and postpandemic comparisons revealed that both patients and clinicians were more satisfied with all aspects of HB-TMH care before the pandemic than during it. CONCLUSIONS: Though conversion to HB-TMH services was feasible during the pandemic, such services need to be improved to enhance patient acceptability.