Cargando…

The prognostic significance of early blood neurofilament light chain concentration and magnetic resonance imaging variables in relapse‐onset multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND: Improved prognostication remains vital in multiple sclerosis to inform personalized treatment approaches. Blood neurofilament light (bNfL) is a promising prognostic biomarker, but to what extent it provides additional information, independent of established MRI metrics, is yet to be esta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Williams, Thomas, Heslegrave, Amanda, Zetterberg, Henrik, Miszkiel, Katherine A, Barkhof, Frederik, Ciccarelli, Olga, Brownlee, Wallace J, Chataway, Jeremy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9480937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35925940
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2700
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Improved prognostication remains vital in multiple sclerosis to inform personalized treatment approaches. Blood neurofilament light (bNfL) is a promising prognostic biomarker, but to what extent it provides additional information, independent of established MRI metrics, is yet to be established. METHODS: We obtained all available bNfL data for 133 patients from a longitudinal observational cohort study. Patients were dichotomized into good or poor outcome groups based upon clinical and cognitive assessments performed 15 years after a clinically isolated syndrome. We performed longitudinal modeling of early NfL and MRI variables to examine differences between outcome groups. RESULTS: The bNfL dataset was incomplete, with one to three (mean 1.5) samples available per participant. Within 3 months of onset, bNfL was similar between groups. The bNfL concentration subsequently decreased in those with a good outcome, and remained persistently elevated in those with a poor outcome. By year 5, NfL in the poor outcome group was approximately double that of those with a good outcome (14.58 [10.40–18.77] vs. 7.71 [6.39–9.04] pg/ml, respectively). Differences were reduced after adjustment for longitudinal changes in T2LV, but trends persisted for a greater rate of increase in NfL in those with a poor outcome, independent of T2LV. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis requires replication in cohorts with more complete bNfL datasets, but suggests that persistently elevated blood NfL may be more common in patients with a poor long‐term outcome. Persistent elevation of blood NfL may provide additional prognostic information not wholly accounted for by standard monitoring techniques.