Cargando…

Comparison of Different First-Line Systemic Therapies in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer Based on Updated Random Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

METHODS: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library for abstracts and full-text articles published from database inception through May 2022. All the random controlled trials (RCTs) were assessed and collected as eligible studies. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). The secon...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Feng, Long, Wang, Ying, Xu, Haoqian, Yi, Fengming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9481325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36119936
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1720696
_version_ 1784791239702347776
author Feng, Long
Wang, Ying
Xu, Haoqian
Yi, Fengming
author_facet Feng, Long
Wang, Ying
Xu, Haoqian
Yi, Fengming
author_sort Feng, Long
collection PubMed
description METHODS: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library for abstracts and full-text articles published from database inception through May 2022. All the random controlled trials (RCTs) were assessed and collected as eligible studies. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). The second outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Seventeen studies, including 3632 patients, were selected from 1361 records. In the network meta-analysis for OS, gemcitabine + cisplatin (GemCis) + cediranib (HR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.00-2.88), GemCis+durvalumab (HR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.06-1.29), and GemCis + merestinib (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.03-4.36) showed the trend of OS benefit over standard treatment (GemCis), although there was no significant difference. GemCis, GemOxa, and gemcitabine+S1 (GemS1) did not differ when comparing OS. In the network meta-analysis for PFS, GemCis+merestinib (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.54-0.83) and GemCis+durvalumab (HR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.08-0.62) showed PFS benefit over standard treatment (GemCis) with a significant difference. GemCis, GemOxa, and GemS1 did not differ when comparing PFS. CONCLUSION: GemCis+durvalumab might be the most promising regimen for advanced BTC when considering OS and PFS. GemOxa and GemS1 could be alternative options for advanced BTC patients with nontolerance to GemCis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9481325
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94813252022-09-17 Comparison of Different First-Line Systemic Therapies in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer Based on Updated Random Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis Feng, Long Wang, Ying Xu, Haoqian Yi, Fengming Biomed Res Int Research Article METHODS: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library for abstracts and full-text articles published from database inception through May 2022. All the random controlled trials (RCTs) were assessed and collected as eligible studies. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). The second outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Seventeen studies, including 3632 patients, were selected from 1361 records. In the network meta-analysis for OS, gemcitabine + cisplatin (GemCis) + cediranib (HR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.00-2.88), GemCis+durvalumab (HR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.06-1.29), and GemCis + merestinib (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.03-4.36) showed the trend of OS benefit over standard treatment (GemCis), although there was no significant difference. GemCis, GemOxa, and gemcitabine+S1 (GemS1) did not differ when comparing OS. In the network meta-analysis for PFS, GemCis+merestinib (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.54-0.83) and GemCis+durvalumab (HR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.08-0.62) showed PFS benefit over standard treatment (GemCis) with a significant difference. GemCis, GemOxa, and GemS1 did not differ when comparing PFS. CONCLUSION: GemCis+durvalumab might be the most promising regimen for advanced BTC when considering OS and PFS. GemOxa and GemS1 could be alternative options for advanced BTC patients with nontolerance to GemCis. Hindawi 2022-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9481325/ /pubmed/36119936 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1720696 Text en Copyright © 2022 Long Feng et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Feng, Long
Wang, Ying
Xu, Haoqian
Yi, Fengming
Comparison of Different First-Line Systemic Therapies in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer Based on Updated Random Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
title Comparison of Different First-Line Systemic Therapies in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer Based on Updated Random Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
title_full Comparison of Different First-Line Systemic Therapies in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer Based on Updated Random Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of Different First-Line Systemic Therapies in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer Based on Updated Random Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Different First-Line Systemic Therapies in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer Based on Updated Random Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
title_short Comparison of Different First-Line Systemic Therapies in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer Based on Updated Random Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
title_sort comparison of different first-line systemic therapies in advanced biliary tract cancer based on updated random controlled trials: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9481325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36119936
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1720696
work_keys_str_mv AT fenglong comparisonofdifferentfirstlinesystemictherapiesinadvancedbiliarytractcancerbasedonupdatedrandomcontrolledtrialsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT wangying comparisonofdifferentfirstlinesystemictherapiesinadvancedbiliarytractcancerbasedonupdatedrandomcontrolledtrialsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT xuhaoqian comparisonofdifferentfirstlinesystemictherapiesinadvancedbiliarytractcancerbasedonupdatedrandomcontrolledtrialsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT yifengming comparisonofdifferentfirstlinesystemictherapiesinadvancedbiliarytractcancerbasedonupdatedrandomcontrolledtrialsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis