Cargando…
Comparison of Different First-Line Systemic Therapies in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer Based on Updated Random Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
METHODS: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library for abstracts and full-text articles published from database inception through May 2022. All the random controlled trials (RCTs) were assessed and collected as eligible studies. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). The secon...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9481325/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36119936 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1720696 |
_version_ | 1784791239702347776 |
---|---|
author | Feng, Long Wang, Ying Xu, Haoqian Yi, Fengming |
author_facet | Feng, Long Wang, Ying Xu, Haoqian Yi, Fengming |
author_sort | Feng, Long |
collection | PubMed |
description | METHODS: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library for abstracts and full-text articles published from database inception through May 2022. All the random controlled trials (RCTs) were assessed and collected as eligible studies. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). The second outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Seventeen studies, including 3632 patients, were selected from 1361 records. In the network meta-analysis for OS, gemcitabine + cisplatin (GemCis) + cediranib (HR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.00-2.88), GemCis+durvalumab (HR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.06-1.29), and GemCis + merestinib (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.03-4.36) showed the trend of OS benefit over standard treatment (GemCis), although there was no significant difference. GemCis, GemOxa, and gemcitabine+S1 (GemS1) did not differ when comparing OS. In the network meta-analysis for PFS, GemCis+merestinib (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.54-0.83) and GemCis+durvalumab (HR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.08-0.62) showed PFS benefit over standard treatment (GemCis) with a significant difference. GemCis, GemOxa, and GemS1 did not differ when comparing PFS. CONCLUSION: GemCis+durvalumab might be the most promising regimen for advanced BTC when considering OS and PFS. GemOxa and GemS1 could be alternative options for advanced BTC patients with nontolerance to GemCis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9481325 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94813252022-09-17 Comparison of Different First-Line Systemic Therapies in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer Based on Updated Random Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis Feng, Long Wang, Ying Xu, Haoqian Yi, Fengming Biomed Res Int Research Article METHODS: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library for abstracts and full-text articles published from database inception through May 2022. All the random controlled trials (RCTs) were assessed and collected as eligible studies. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). The second outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Seventeen studies, including 3632 patients, were selected from 1361 records. In the network meta-analysis for OS, gemcitabine + cisplatin (GemCis) + cediranib (HR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.00-2.88), GemCis+durvalumab (HR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.06-1.29), and GemCis + merestinib (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.03-4.36) showed the trend of OS benefit over standard treatment (GemCis), although there was no significant difference. GemCis, GemOxa, and gemcitabine+S1 (GemS1) did not differ when comparing OS. In the network meta-analysis for PFS, GemCis+merestinib (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.54-0.83) and GemCis+durvalumab (HR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.08-0.62) showed PFS benefit over standard treatment (GemCis) with a significant difference. GemCis, GemOxa, and GemS1 did not differ when comparing PFS. CONCLUSION: GemCis+durvalumab might be the most promising regimen for advanced BTC when considering OS and PFS. GemOxa and GemS1 could be alternative options for advanced BTC patients with nontolerance to GemCis. Hindawi 2022-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9481325/ /pubmed/36119936 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1720696 Text en Copyright © 2022 Long Feng et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Feng, Long Wang, Ying Xu, Haoqian Yi, Fengming Comparison of Different First-Line Systemic Therapies in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer Based on Updated Random Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis |
title | Comparison of Different First-Line Systemic Therapies in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer Based on Updated Random Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Comparison of Different First-Line Systemic Therapies in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer Based on Updated Random Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Different First-Line Systemic Therapies in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer Based on Updated Random Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Different First-Line Systemic Therapies in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer Based on Updated Random Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Comparison of Different First-Line Systemic Therapies in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer Based on Updated Random Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | comparison of different first-line systemic therapies in advanced biliary tract cancer based on updated random controlled trials: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9481325/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36119936 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1720696 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fenglong comparisonofdifferentfirstlinesystemictherapiesinadvancedbiliarytractcancerbasedonupdatedrandomcontrolledtrialsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT wangying comparisonofdifferentfirstlinesystemictherapiesinadvancedbiliarytractcancerbasedonupdatedrandomcontrolledtrialsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT xuhaoqian comparisonofdifferentfirstlinesystemictherapiesinadvancedbiliarytractcancerbasedonupdatedrandomcontrolledtrialsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT yifengming comparisonofdifferentfirstlinesystemictherapiesinadvancedbiliarytractcancerbasedonupdatedrandomcontrolledtrialsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis |