Cargando…
Identifying Glucose Metabolism Status in Nondiabetic Japanese Adults Using Machine Learning Model with Simple Questionnaire
We aimed to identify the glucose metabolism statuses of nondiabetic Japanese adults using a machine learning model with a questionnaire. In this cross-sectional study, Japanese adults (aged 20–64 years) from Tokyo and surrounding areas were recruited. Participants underwent an oral glucose tolerance...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9481387/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36118835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1026121 |
_version_ | 1784791254972760064 |
---|---|
author | Uchida, Tomoki Kanamori, Takeshi Teramoto, Takanori Nonaka, Yuji Tanaka, Hiroki Nakamura, Satoshi Murayama, Norihito |
author_facet | Uchida, Tomoki Kanamori, Takeshi Teramoto, Takanori Nonaka, Yuji Tanaka, Hiroki Nakamura, Satoshi Murayama, Norihito |
author_sort | Uchida, Tomoki |
collection | PubMed |
description | We aimed to identify the glucose metabolism statuses of nondiabetic Japanese adults using a machine learning model with a questionnaire. In this cross-sectional study, Japanese adults (aged 20–64 years) from Tokyo and surrounding areas were recruited. Participants underwent an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and completed a questionnaire regarding lifestyle and physical characteristics. They were classified into four glycometabolic categories based on the OGTT results: category 1: best glucose metabolism, category 2: low insulin sensitivity, category 3: low insulin secretion, and category 4: combined characteristics of categories 2 and 3. A total of 977 individuals were included; the ratios of participants in categories 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 46%, 21%, 14%, and 19%, respectively. Machine learning models (decision tree, support vector machine, random forest, and XGBoost) were developed for identifying the glycometabolic category using questionnaire responses. Then, the top 10 most important variables in the random forest model were selected, and another random forest model was developed using these variables. Its areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) to classify category 1 and the others, category 2 and the others, category 3 and the others, and category 4 and the others were 0.68 (95% confidence intervals: 0.62–0.75), 0.66 (0.58–0.73), 0.61 (0.51–0.70), and 0.70 (0.62–0.77). For external validation of the model, the same dataset of 452 Japanese adults in Hokkaido was obtained. The AUCs to classify categories 1, 2, 3, and 4 and the others were 0.66 (0.61–0.71), 0.57 (0.51–0.62), 0.60 (0.50–0.69), and 0.64 (0.57–0.71). In conclusion, our model could identify the glucose metabolism status using only 10 factors of lifestyle and physical characteristics. This model may help the larger general population without diabetes to understand their glucose metabolism status and encourage lifestyle improvement to prevent diabetes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9481387 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94813872022-09-17 Identifying Glucose Metabolism Status in Nondiabetic Japanese Adults Using Machine Learning Model with Simple Questionnaire Uchida, Tomoki Kanamori, Takeshi Teramoto, Takanori Nonaka, Yuji Tanaka, Hiroki Nakamura, Satoshi Murayama, Norihito Comput Math Methods Med Research Article We aimed to identify the glucose metabolism statuses of nondiabetic Japanese adults using a machine learning model with a questionnaire. In this cross-sectional study, Japanese adults (aged 20–64 years) from Tokyo and surrounding areas were recruited. Participants underwent an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and completed a questionnaire regarding lifestyle and physical characteristics. They were classified into four glycometabolic categories based on the OGTT results: category 1: best glucose metabolism, category 2: low insulin sensitivity, category 3: low insulin secretion, and category 4: combined characteristics of categories 2 and 3. A total of 977 individuals were included; the ratios of participants in categories 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 46%, 21%, 14%, and 19%, respectively. Machine learning models (decision tree, support vector machine, random forest, and XGBoost) were developed for identifying the glycometabolic category using questionnaire responses. Then, the top 10 most important variables in the random forest model were selected, and another random forest model was developed using these variables. Its areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) to classify category 1 and the others, category 2 and the others, category 3 and the others, and category 4 and the others were 0.68 (95% confidence intervals: 0.62–0.75), 0.66 (0.58–0.73), 0.61 (0.51–0.70), and 0.70 (0.62–0.77). For external validation of the model, the same dataset of 452 Japanese adults in Hokkaido was obtained. The AUCs to classify categories 1, 2, 3, and 4 and the others were 0.66 (0.61–0.71), 0.57 (0.51–0.62), 0.60 (0.50–0.69), and 0.64 (0.57–0.71). In conclusion, our model could identify the glucose metabolism status using only 10 factors of lifestyle and physical characteristics. This model may help the larger general population without diabetes to understand their glucose metabolism status and encourage lifestyle improvement to prevent diabetes. Hindawi 2022-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9481387/ /pubmed/36118835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1026121 Text en Copyright © 2022 Tomoki Uchida et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Uchida, Tomoki Kanamori, Takeshi Teramoto, Takanori Nonaka, Yuji Tanaka, Hiroki Nakamura, Satoshi Murayama, Norihito Identifying Glucose Metabolism Status in Nondiabetic Japanese Adults Using Machine Learning Model with Simple Questionnaire |
title | Identifying Glucose Metabolism Status in Nondiabetic Japanese Adults Using Machine Learning Model with Simple Questionnaire |
title_full | Identifying Glucose Metabolism Status in Nondiabetic Japanese Adults Using Machine Learning Model with Simple Questionnaire |
title_fullStr | Identifying Glucose Metabolism Status in Nondiabetic Japanese Adults Using Machine Learning Model with Simple Questionnaire |
title_full_unstemmed | Identifying Glucose Metabolism Status in Nondiabetic Japanese Adults Using Machine Learning Model with Simple Questionnaire |
title_short | Identifying Glucose Metabolism Status in Nondiabetic Japanese Adults Using Machine Learning Model with Simple Questionnaire |
title_sort | identifying glucose metabolism status in nondiabetic japanese adults using machine learning model with simple questionnaire |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9481387/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36118835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1026121 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT uchidatomoki identifyingglucosemetabolismstatusinnondiabeticjapaneseadultsusingmachinelearningmodelwithsimplequestionnaire AT kanamoritakeshi identifyingglucosemetabolismstatusinnondiabeticjapaneseadultsusingmachinelearningmodelwithsimplequestionnaire AT teramototakanori identifyingglucosemetabolismstatusinnondiabeticjapaneseadultsusingmachinelearningmodelwithsimplequestionnaire AT nonakayuji identifyingglucosemetabolismstatusinnondiabeticjapaneseadultsusingmachinelearningmodelwithsimplequestionnaire AT tanakahiroki identifyingglucosemetabolismstatusinnondiabeticjapaneseadultsusingmachinelearningmodelwithsimplequestionnaire AT nakamurasatoshi identifyingglucosemetabolismstatusinnondiabeticjapaneseadultsusingmachinelearningmodelwithsimplequestionnaire AT murayamanorihito identifyingglucosemetabolismstatusinnondiabeticjapaneseadultsusingmachinelearningmodelwithsimplequestionnaire |