Cargando…

Which serum markers predict the success of reimplantation after periprosthetic joint infection?

PURPOSE: In clinical practice, serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) levels are routinely used to screen for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), but the effectiveness of predicting the success of reimplantation is variable. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shao, Hongyi, Bian, Tao, Zhou, Yixin, Huang, Yong, Song, Yang, Yang, Dejin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9481767/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36112243
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10195-022-00664-5
_version_ 1784791323930263552
author Shao, Hongyi
Bian, Tao
Zhou, Yixin
Huang, Yong
Song, Yang
Yang, Dejin
author_facet Shao, Hongyi
Bian, Tao
Zhou, Yixin
Huang, Yong
Song, Yang
Yang, Dejin
author_sort Shao, Hongyi
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: In clinical practice, serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) levels are routinely used to screen for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), but the effectiveness of predicting the success of reimplantation is variable. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic effectiveness of serum CRP, ESR, plasma D-dimer, and fibrinogen values in groups achieving treatment success or failure for PJI. METHODS: A total of 119 PJI cases between January 2012 and January 2017 were identified and included in this study. The most recent serum CRP, ESR, plasma D-dimer, and fibrinogen values obtained prior to performing second-stage revision or spacer exchange were collected for analysis. Treatment failure was defined as having been unable to undergo reimplantation due to clinically persistent infection or reinfection after reimplantation. RESULTS: All these tests showed significantly lower values in the treatment success group than in the treatment failure group. The optimal cutoff serum CRP, ESR, plasma D-dimer, and fibrinogen levels for predicting the success of reimplantation were 9.4 mg/L, 29 mm/h, 1740 ng/mL, and 365.6 mg/dL, respectively. All tests had the same sensitivity (72.7%) except for ESR (63.6%), while their specificities were 92.6%, 88.0%, 72.3%, and 83.2%, respectively. Plasma fibrinogen had the highest AUC value of 0.831 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.685 to 0.978], followed by serum CRP (0.829) and ESR (0.795); plasma D-dimer had the lowest AUC value of 0.716 (95% CI, 0.573 to 0.859). CONCLUSION: Plasma CRP and fibrinogen are good tests for predicting reimplantation success after two-stage revision procedures for patients with PJI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9481767
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94817672022-10-21 Which serum markers predict the success of reimplantation after periprosthetic joint infection? Shao, Hongyi Bian, Tao Zhou, Yixin Huang, Yong Song, Yang Yang, Dejin J Orthop Traumatol Original Article PURPOSE: In clinical practice, serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) levels are routinely used to screen for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), but the effectiveness of predicting the success of reimplantation is variable. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic effectiveness of serum CRP, ESR, plasma D-dimer, and fibrinogen values in groups achieving treatment success or failure for PJI. METHODS: A total of 119 PJI cases between January 2012 and January 2017 were identified and included in this study. The most recent serum CRP, ESR, plasma D-dimer, and fibrinogen values obtained prior to performing second-stage revision or spacer exchange were collected for analysis. Treatment failure was defined as having been unable to undergo reimplantation due to clinically persistent infection or reinfection after reimplantation. RESULTS: All these tests showed significantly lower values in the treatment success group than in the treatment failure group. The optimal cutoff serum CRP, ESR, plasma D-dimer, and fibrinogen levels for predicting the success of reimplantation were 9.4 mg/L, 29 mm/h, 1740 ng/mL, and 365.6 mg/dL, respectively. All tests had the same sensitivity (72.7%) except for ESR (63.6%), while their specificities were 92.6%, 88.0%, 72.3%, and 83.2%, respectively. Plasma fibrinogen had the highest AUC value of 0.831 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.685 to 0.978], followed by serum CRP (0.829) and ESR (0.795); plasma D-dimer had the lowest AUC value of 0.716 (95% CI, 0.573 to 0.859). CONCLUSION: Plasma CRP and fibrinogen are good tests for predicting reimplantation success after two-stage revision procedures for patients with PJI. Springer International Publishing 2022-09-16 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9481767/ /pubmed/36112243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10195-022-00664-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Shao, Hongyi
Bian, Tao
Zhou, Yixin
Huang, Yong
Song, Yang
Yang, Dejin
Which serum markers predict the success of reimplantation after periprosthetic joint infection?
title Which serum markers predict the success of reimplantation after periprosthetic joint infection?
title_full Which serum markers predict the success of reimplantation after periprosthetic joint infection?
title_fullStr Which serum markers predict the success of reimplantation after periprosthetic joint infection?
title_full_unstemmed Which serum markers predict the success of reimplantation after periprosthetic joint infection?
title_short Which serum markers predict the success of reimplantation after periprosthetic joint infection?
title_sort which serum markers predict the success of reimplantation after periprosthetic joint infection?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9481767/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36112243
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10195-022-00664-5
work_keys_str_mv AT shaohongyi whichserummarkerspredictthesuccessofreimplantationafterperiprostheticjointinfection
AT biantao whichserummarkerspredictthesuccessofreimplantationafterperiprostheticjointinfection
AT zhouyixin whichserummarkerspredictthesuccessofreimplantationafterperiprostheticjointinfection
AT huangyong whichserummarkerspredictthesuccessofreimplantationafterperiprostheticjointinfection
AT songyang whichserummarkerspredictthesuccessofreimplantationafterperiprostheticjointinfection
AT yangdejin whichserummarkerspredictthesuccessofreimplantationafterperiprostheticjointinfection