Cargando…
Which serum markers predict the success of reimplantation after periprosthetic joint infection?
PURPOSE: In clinical practice, serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) levels are routinely used to screen for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), but the effectiveness of predicting the success of reimplantation is variable. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnos...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9481767/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36112243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10195-022-00664-5 |
_version_ | 1784791323930263552 |
---|---|
author | Shao, Hongyi Bian, Tao Zhou, Yixin Huang, Yong Song, Yang Yang, Dejin |
author_facet | Shao, Hongyi Bian, Tao Zhou, Yixin Huang, Yong Song, Yang Yang, Dejin |
author_sort | Shao, Hongyi |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: In clinical practice, serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) levels are routinely used to screen for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), but the effectiveness of predicting the success of reimplantation is variable. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic effectiveness of serum CRP, ESR, plasma D-dimer, and fibrinogen values in groups achieving treatment success or failure for PJI. METHODS: A total of 119 PJI cases between January 2012 and January 2017 were identified and included in this study. The most recent serum CRP, ESR, plasma D-dimer, and fibrinogen values obtained prior to performing second-stage revision or spacer exchange were collected for analysis. Treatment failure was defined as having been unable to undergo reimplantation due to clinically persistent infection or reinfection after reimplantation. RESULTS: All these tests showed significantly lower values in the treatment success group than in the treatment failure group. The optimal cutoff serum CRP, ESR, plasma D-dimer, and fibrinogen levels for predicting the success of reimplantation were 9.4 mg/L, 29 mm/h, 1740 ng/mL, and 365.6 mg/dL, respectively. All tests had the same sensitivity (72.7%) except for ESR (63.6%), while their specificities were 92.6%, 88.0%, 72.3%, and 83.2%, respectively. Plasma fibrinogen had the highest AUC value of 0.831 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.685 to 0.978], followed by serum CRP (0.829) and ESR (0.795); plasma D-dimer had the lowest AUC value of 0.716 (95% CI, 0.573 to 0.859). CONCLUSION: Plasma CRP and fibrinogen are good tests for predicting reimplantation success after two-stage revision procedures for patients with PJI. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9481767 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94817672022-10-21 Which serum markers predict the success of reimplantation after periprosthetic joint infection? Shao, Hongyi Bian, Tao Zhou, Yixin Huang, Yong Song, Yang Yang, Dejin J Orthop Traumatol Original Article PURPOSE: In clinical practice, serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) levels are routinely used to screen for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), but the effectiveness of predicting the success of reimplantation is variable. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic effectiveness of serum CRP, ESR, plasma D-dimer, and fibrinogen values in groups achieving treatment success or failure for PJI. METHODS: A total of 119 PJI cases between January 2012 and January 2017 were identified and included in this study. The most recent serum CRP, ESR, plasma D-dimer, and fibrinogen values obtained prior to performing second-stage revision or spacer exchange were collected for analysis. Treatment failure was defined as having been unable to undergo reimplantation due to clinically persistent infection or reinfection after reimplantation. RESULTS: All these tests showed significantly lower values in the treatment success group than in the treatment failure group. The optimal cutoff serum CRP, ESR, plasma D-dimer, and fibrinogen levels for predicting the success of reimplantation were 9.4 mg/L, 29 mm/h, 1740 ng/mL, and 365.6 mg/dL, respectively. All tests had the same sensitivity (72.7%) except for ESR (63.6%), while their specificities were 92.6%, 88.0%, 72.3%, and 83.2%, respectively. Plasma fibrinogen had the highest AUC value of 0.831 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.685 to 0.978], followed by serum CRP (0.829) and ESR (0.795); plasma D-dimer had the lowest AUC value of 0.716 (95% CI, 0.573 to 0.859). CONCLUSION: Plasma CRP and fibrinogen are good tests for predicting reimplantation success after two-stage revision procedures for patients with PJI. Springer International Publishing 2022-09-16 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9481767/ /pubmed/36112243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10195-022-00664-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Shao, Hongyi Bian, Tao Zhou, Yixin Huang, Yong Song, Yang Yang, Dejin Which serum markers predict the success of reimplantation after periprosthetic joint infection? |
title | Which serum markers predict the success of reimplantation after periprosthetic joint infection? |
title_full | Which serum markers predict the success of reimplantation after periprosthetic joint infection? |
title_fullStr | Which serum markers predict the success of reimplantation after periprosthetic joint infection? |
title_full_unstemmed | Which serum markers predict the success of reimplantation after periprosthetic joint infection? |
title_short | Which serum markers predict the success of reimplantation after periprosthetic joint infection? |
title_sort | which serum markers predict the success of reimplantation after periprosthetic joint infection? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9481767/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36112243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10195-022-00664-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shaohongyi whichserummarkerspredictthesuccessofreimplantationafterperiprostheticjointinfection AT biantao whichserummarkerspredictthesuccessofreimplantationafterperiprostheticjointinfection AT zhouyixin whichserummarkerspredictthesuccessofreimplantationafterperiprostheticjointinfection AT huangyong whichserummarkerspredictthesuccessofreimplantationafterperiprostheticjointinfection AT songyang whichserummarkerspredictthesuccessofreimplantationafterperiprostheticjointinfection AT yangdejin whichserummarkerspredictthesuccessofreimplantationafterperiprostheticjointinfection |