Cargando…
The Live Long Walk Strong Rehabilitation Program Study: Design and Methods
OBJECTIVE: To identify attributes targeted by rehabilitative treatment within which improvements lead to short- and long-term changes in mobility. Maintaining independence in mobility is important to many older adults and is associated with critical outcomes such as aging in place, morbidity, and mo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9482036/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36123980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arrct.2022.100205 |
_version_ | 1784791365109940224 |
---|---|
author | Harris, Rebekah Brach, Jennifer S. Moye, Jennifer Ogawa, Elisa Ward, Rachel Halasz, Ildiko Bean, Jonathan |
author_facet | Harris, Rebekah Brach, Jennifer S. Moye, Jennifer Ogawa, Elisa Ward, Rachel Halasz, Ildiko Bean, Jonathan |
author_sort | Harris, Rebekah |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To identify attributes targeted by rehabilitative treatment within which improvements lead to short- and long-term changes in mobility. Maintaining independence in mobility is important to many older adults and is associated with critical outcomes such as aging in place, morbidity, and mortality. DESIGN: The Live Long Walk Strong rehabilitation study is a phase 2 single-blind, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, outpatient physical therapy. PARTICIPANTS: 198 community-dwelling middle- and older-aged veterans (aged 50 years and older) will be recruited from primary care practices (N=198). INTERVENTIONS: Comparing a moderate-vigorous intensity physical therapy program of 10 sessions with a waitlist control group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary outcome measure is gait speed. Secondary outcomes include leg strength and power, trunk muscle endurance, gait smoothness, and exercise self-efficacy. RESULTS: Outcomes will be assessed within 2 weeks of intervention completion, at 8 weeks postintervention, and at 16 weeks postintervention. Two-sample t tests will compare mean change in gait speed and target attributes (leg power, trunk muscle endurance, gait smoothness, and exercise self-efficacy) between treatment and control groups. Paired t tests will examine within-person change at subsequent follow-up visits. Multivariable regression analyses will evaluate relationships between dependent and independent variables and potential mediation adjusting for relevant covariates. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study are expected to advance and refine the design of Live Long Walk Strong rehabilitative care and demonstrate its proof of concept and efficacy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9482036 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94820362022-09-18 The Live Long Walk Strong Rehabilitation Program Study: Design and Methods Harris, Rebekah Brach, Jennifer S. Moye, Jennifer Ogawa, Elisa Ward, Rachel Halasz, Ildiko Bean, Jonathan Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl Original Research OBJECTIVE: To identify attributes targeted by rehabilitative treatment within which improvements lead to short- and long-term changes in mobility. Maintaining independence in mobility is important to many older adults and is associated with critical outcomes such as aging in place, morbidity, and mortality. DESIGN: The Live Long Walk Strong rehabilitation study is a phase 2 single-blind, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, outpatient physical therapy. PARTICIPANTS: 198 community-dwelling middle- and older-aged veterans (aged 50 years and older) will be recruited from primary care practices (N=198). INTERVENTIONS: Comparing a moderate-vigorous intensity physical therapy program of 10 sessions with a waitlist control group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary outcome measure is gait speed. Secondary outcomes include leg strength and power, trunk muscle endurance, gait smoothness, and exercise self-efficacy. RESULTS: Outcomes will be assessed within 2 weeks of intervention completion, at 8 weeks postintervention, and at 16 weeks postintervention. Two-sample t tests will compare mean change in gait speed and target attributes (leg power, trunk muscle endurance, gait smoothness, and exercise self-efficacy) between treatment and control groups. Paired t tests will examine within-person change at subsequent follow-up visits. Multivariable regression analyses will evaluate relationships between dependent and independent variables and potential mediation adjusting for relevant covariates. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study are expected to advance and refine the design of Live Long Walk Strong rehabilitative care and demonstrate its proof of concept and efficacy. Elsevier 2022-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9482036/ /pubmed/36123980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arrct.2022.100205 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Harris, Rebekah Brach, Jennifer S. Moye, Jennifer Ogawa, Elisa Ward, Rachel Halasz, Ildiko Bean, Jonathan The Live Long Walk Strong Rehabilitation Program Study: Design and Methods |
title | The Live Long Walk Strong Rehabilitation Program Study: Design and Methods |
title_full | The Live Long Walk Strong Rehabilitation Program Study: Design and Methods |
title_fullStr | The Live Long Walk Strong Rehabilitation Program Study: Design and Methods |
title_full_unstemmed | The Live Long Walk Strong Rehabilitation Program Study: Design and Methods |
title_short | The Live Long Walk Strong Rehabilitation Program Study: Design and Methods |
title_sort | live long walk strong rehabilitation program study: design and methods |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9482036/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36123980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arrct.2022.100205 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT harrisrebekah thelivelongwalkstrongrehabilitationprogramstudydesignandmethods AT brachjennifers thelivelongwalkstrongrehabilitationprogramstudydesignandmethods AT moyejennifer thelivelongwalkstrongrehabilitationprogramstudydesignandmethods AT ogawaelisa thelivelongwalkstrongrehabilitationprogramstudydesignandmethods AT wardrachel thelivelongwalkstrongrehabilitationprogramstudydesignandmethods AT halaszildiko thelivelongwalkstrongrehabilitationprogramstudydesignandmethods AT beanjonathan thelivelongwalkstrongrehabilitationprogramstudydesignandmethods AT harrisrebekah livelongwalkstrongrehabilitationprogramstudydesignandmethods AT brachjennifers livelongwalkstrongrehabilitationprogramstudydesignandmethods AT moyejennifer livelongwalkstrongrehabilitationprogramstudydesignandmethods AT ogawaelisa livelongwalkstrongrehabilitationprogramstudydesignandmethods AT wardrachel livelongwalkstrongrehabilitationprogramstudydesignandmethods AT halaszildiko livelongwalkstrongrehabilitationprogramstudydesignandmethods AT beanjonathan livelongwalkstrongrehabilitationprogramstudydesignandmethods |