Cargando…

The Live Long Walk Strong Rehabilitation Program Study: Design and Methods

OBJECTIVE: To identify attributes targeted by rehabilitative treatment within which improvements lead to short- and long-term changes in mobility. Maintaining independence in mobility is important to many older adults and is associated with critical outcomes such as aging in place, morbidity, and mo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harris, Rebekah, Brach, Jennifer S., Moye, Jennifer, Ogawa, Elisa, Ward, Rachel, Halasz, Ildiko, Bean, Jonathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9482036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36123980
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arrct.2022.100205
_version_ 1784791365109940224
author Harris, Rebekah
Brach, Jennifer S.
Moye, Jennifer
Ogawa, Elisa
Ward, Rachel
Halasz, Ildiko
Bean, Jonathan
author_facet Harris, Rebekah
Brach, Jennifer S.
Moye, Jennifer
Ogawa, Elisa
Ward, Rachel
Halasz, Ildiko
Bean, Jonathan
author_sort Harris, Rebekah
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To identify attributes targeted by rehabilitative treatment within which improvements lead to short- and long-term changes in mobility. Maintaining independence in mobility is important to many older adults and is associated with critical outcomes such as aging in place, morbidity, and mortality. DESIGN: The Live Long Walk Strong rehabilitation study is a phase 2 single-blind, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, outpatient physical therapy. PARTICIPANTS: 198 community-dwelling middle- and older-aged veterans (aged 50 years and older) will be recruited from primary care practices (N=198). INTERVENTIONS: Comparing a moderate-vigorous intensity physical therapy program of 10 sessions with a waitlist control group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary outcome measure is gait speed. Secondary outcomes include leg strength and power, trunk muscle endurance, gait smoothness, and exercise self-efficacy. RESULTS: Outcomes will be assessed within 2 weeks of intervention completion, at 8 weeks postintervention, and at 16 weeks postintervention. Two-sample t tests will compare mean change in gait speed and target attributes (leg power, trunk muscle endurance, gait smoothness, and exercise self-efficacy) between treatment and control groups. Paired t tests will examine within-person change at subsequent follow-up visits. Multivariable regression analyses will evaluate relationships between dependent and independent variables and potential mediation adjusting for relevant covariates. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study are expected to advance and refine the design of Live Long Walk Strong rehabilitative care and demonstrate its proof of concept and efficacy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9482036
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94820362022-09-18 The Live Long Walk Strong Rehabilitation Program Study: Design and Methods Harris, Rebekah Brach, Jennifer S. Moye, Jennifer Ogawa, Elisa Ward, Rachel Halasz, Ildiko Bean, Jonathan Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl Original Research OBJECTIVE: To identify attributes targeted by rehabilitative treatment within which improvements lead to short- and long-term changes in mobility. Maintaining independence in mobility is important to many older adults and is associated with critical outcomes such as aging in place, morbidity, and mortality. DESIGN: The Live Long Walk Strong rehabilitation study is a phase 2 single-blind, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, outpatient physical therapy. PARTICIPANTS: 198 community-dwelling middle- and older-aged veterans (aged 50 years and older) will be recruited from primary care practices (N=198). INTERVENTIONS: Comparing a moderate-vigorous intensity physical therapy program of 10 sessions with a waitlist control group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary outcome measure is gait speed. Secondary outcomes include leg strength and power, trunk muscle endurance, gait smoothness, and exercise self-efficacy. RESULTS: Outcomes will be assessed within 2 weeks of intervention completion, at 8 weeks postintervention, and at 16 weeks postintervention. Two-sample t tests will compare mean change in gait speed and target attributes (leg power, trunk muscle endurance, gait smoothness, and exercise self-efficacy) between treatment and control groups. Paired t tests will examine within-person change at subsequent follow-up visits. Multivariable regression analyses will evaluate relationships between dependent and independent variables and potential mediation adjusting for relevant covariates. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study are expected to advance and refine the design of Live Long Walk Strong rehabilitative care and demonstrate its proof of concept and efficacy. Elsevier 2022-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9482036/ /pubmed/36123980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arrct.2022.100205 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Harris, Rebekah
Brach, Jennifer S.
Moye, Jennifer
Ogawa, Elisa
Ward, Rachel
Halasz, Ildiko
Bean, Jonathan
The Live Long Walk Strong Rehabilitation Program Study: Design and Methods
title The Live Long Walk Strong Rehabilitation Program Study: Design and Methods
title_full The Live Long Walk Strong Rehabilitation Program Study: Design and Methods
title_fullStr The Live Long Walk Strong Rehabilitation Program Study: Design and Methods
title_full_unstemmed The Live Long Walk Strong Rehabilitation Program Study: Design and Methods
title_short The Live Long Walk Strong Rehabilitation Program Study: Design and Methods
title_sort live long walk strong rehabilitation program study: design and methods
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9482036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36123980
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arrct.2022.100205
work_keys_str_mv AT harrisrebekah thelivelongwalkstrongrehabilitationprogramstudydesignandmethods
AT brachjennifers thelivelongwalkstrongrehabilitationprogramstudydesignandmethods
AT moyejennifer thelivelongwalkstrongrehabilitationprogramstudydesignandmethods
AT ogawaelisa thelivelongwalkstrongrehabilitationprogramstudydesignandmethods
AT wardrachel thelivelongwalkstrongrehabilitationprogramstudydesignandmethods
AT halaszildiko thelivelongwalkstrongrehabilitationprogramstudydesignandmethods
AT beanjonathan thelivelongwalkstrongrehabilitationprogramstudydesignandmethods
AT harrisrebekah livelongwalkstrongrehabilitationprogramstudydesignandmethods
AT brachjennifers livelongwalkstrongrehabilitationprogramstudydesignandmethods
AT moyejennifer livelongwalkstrongrehabilitationprogramstudydesignandmethods
AT ogawaelisa livelongwalkstrongrehabilitationprogramstudydesignandmethods
AT wardrachel livelongwalkstrongrehabilitationprogramstudydesignandmethods
AT halaszildiko livelongwalkstrongrehabilitationprogramstudydesignandmethods
AT beanjonathan livelongwalkstrongrehabilitationprogramstudydesignandmethods