Cargando…
Rehabilitation workforce descriptors: a scoping review
BACKGROUND: A comprehensive, accurate description of workforce capacity is important for health service planning, to ensure that health services meet local needs. In many low- to middle-income countries, the government’s service planning ability is barred by the lack of accurate and/or comprehensive...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9482289/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36115976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08531-z |
_version_ | 1784791423138136064 |
---|---|
author | Conradie, Thandi Berner, Karina Louw, Quinette |
author_facet | Conradie, Thandi Berner, Karina Louw, Quinette |
author_sort | Conradie, Thandi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A comprehensive, accurate description of workforce capacity is important for health service planning, to ensure that health services meet local needs. In many low- to middle-income countries, the government’s service planning ability is barred by the lack of accurate and/or comprehensively-described workforce data. In these low-resource settings, lack of appropriate planning leads to limited or no access to rehabilitation services. Variability in the definitions and scope of rehabilitation professionals further complicates the understanding of rehabilitation services and how it should be planned and delivered. Another challenge to describing the primary rehabilitation workforce capacity, is the lack of standardised and agreed-upon global metrics. These inconsistencies highlight the need for a comprehensive understanding of current practices, which can offer guidance to countries wishing to describe their rehabilitation workforce. This study aimed to scope the range of descriptors and metrics used to describe the rehabilitation workforce and to compare the workforce across countries that used similar descriptors in published reports. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted according to the five-step framework first developed by Arksey and O’Malley. The review included a broad search of literature regarding the rehabilitation workforce and how countries quantify and describe the rehabilitation workforce. RESULTS: Nineteen studies on rehabilitation workforce capacity were identified. All but one (a cross-sectional study) were database reviews. The main descriptors and indicators used to describe the rehabilitation workforce capacity were profession type, age, gender, distributions between urban/rural, level of care, and private/public sectors, absolute count totals, and population-adjusted ratios. CONCLUSION: This scoping review provided an overview of descriptors and indicators used to describe the rehabilitation workforce capacity internationally. The study is a first step towards developing standardised descriptors and metrics to quantify the rehabilitation workforce capacity, that will allow for comparison between different settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This scoping review protocol has been registered with the Open Science Framework (http://osf.10/7h6xz). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-08531-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9482289 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94822892022-09-18 Rehabilitation workforce descriptors: a scoping review Conradie, Thandi Berner, Karina Louw, Quinette BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: A comprehensive, accurate description of workforce capacity is important for health service planning, to ensure that health services meet local needs. In many low- to middle-income countries, the government’s service planning ability is barred by the lack of accurate and/or comprehensively-described workforce data. In these low-resource settings, lack of appropriate planning leads to limited or no access to rehabilitation services. Variability in the definitions and scope of rehabilitation professionals further complicates the understanding of rehabilitation services and how it should be planned and delivered. Another challenge to describing the primary rehabilitation workforce capacity, is the lack of standardised and agreed-upon global metrics. These inconsistencies highlight the need for a comprehensive understanding of current practices, which can offer guidance to countries wishing to describe their rehabilitation workforce. This study aimed to scope the range of descriptors and metrics used to describe the rehabilitation workforce and to compare the workforce across countries that used similar descriptors in published reports. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted according to the five-step framework first developed by Arksey and O’Malley. The review included a broad search of literature regarding the rehabilitation workforce and how countries quantify and describe the rehabilitation workforce. RESULTS: Nineteen studies on rehabilitation workforce capacity were identified. All but one (a cross-sectional study) were database reviews. The main descriptors and indicators used to describe the rehabilitation workforce capacity were profession type, age, gender, distributions between urban/rural, level of care, and private/public sectors, absolute count totals, and population-adjusted ratios. CONCLUSION: This scoping review provided an overview of descriptors and indicators used to describe the rehabilitation workforce capacity internationally. The study is a first step towards developing standardised descriptors and metrics to quantify the rehabilitation workforce capacity, that will allow for comparison between different settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This scoping review protocol has been registered with the Open Science Framework (http://osf.10/7h6xz). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-08531-z. BioMed Central 2022-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9482289/ /pubmed/36115976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08531-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Conradie, Thandi Berner, Karina Louw, Quinette Rehabilitation workforce descriptors: a scoping review |
title | Rehabilitation workforce descriptors: a scoping review |
title_full | Rehabilitation workforce descriptors: a scoping review |
title_fullStr | Rehabilitation workforce descriptors: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Rehabilitation workforce descriptors: a scoping review |
title_short | Rehabilitation workforce descriptors: a scoping review |
title_sort | rehabilitation workforce descriptors: a scoping review |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9482289/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36115976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08531-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT conradiethandi rehabilitationworkforcedescriptorsascopingreview AT bernerkarina rehabilitationworkforcedescriptorsascopingreview AT louwquinette rehabilitationworkforcedescriptorsascopingreview |