Cargando…
Assessing the “negative effect” and “positive effect” of COVID-19 in China
The COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns led to a sharp drop in socio-economic activities in China in 2020, including reductions in fossil fuel use, industry productions, and traffic volumes. China's economy suffered a serious negative effect from COVID-19. However, there is a “positive effect” on CO(2)...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Ltd.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9482555/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36160312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134080 |
_version_ | 1784791482278871040 |
---|---|
author | Wen, Wen Li, Yueyang Song, Yu |
author_facet | Wen, Wen Li, Yueyang Song, Yu |
author_sort | Wen, Wen |
collection | PubMed |
description | The COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns led to a sharp drop in socio-economic activities in China in 2020, including reductions in fossil fuel use, industry productions, and traffic volumes. China's economy suffered a serious negative effect from COVID-19. However, there is a “positive effect” on CO(2) emissions reduction. Here, for the first time, this paper constructs a new model named “Weighted Multi-regional Hypothetical Extraction Method (WMHEM)” based on a multiregional input-output model. It not only solves the problems of traditional HEM methods such as improper use of assumptions, excessive reliance on industry intermediate input, but also accurately reflects the impact of external shocks on the inter-industry linkages. By using the monthly economic data of each provinces in China during COVID-19 (except Hong Kong,Macao and Taiwan) an the latest Multi-regional input-output tables, the “economic negative effect” and “CO(2) emission positive effect” under COVID-19 in China are measured. Results show that COVID-19 lockdown was estimated to have reduced China's CO(2) emissions substantially between January and March in 2020, with the largest reductions in February. With the spread of coronavirus controlled, China's CO(2) emissions rebounded in April. In addition, key emission reduction sectors and key development encouraged sectors are selected by combining “economic negative effect” and “CO(2) emission positive effect” during COVID-19. Therefore, policies recommendations are put forward based on forward and backward linkages respectively which are from two ends of the supply chain to turn pandemic-related CO(2) emissions declines into firm climate action. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9482555 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94825552022-09-19 Assessing the “negative effect” and “positive effect” of COVID-19 in China Wen, Wen Li, Yueyang Song, Yu J Clean Prod Article The COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns led to a sharp drop in socio-economic activities in China in 2020, including reductions in fossil fuel use, industry productions, and traffic volumes. China's economy suffered a serious negative effect from COVID-19. However, there is a “positive effect” on CO(2) emissions reduction. Here, for the first time, this paper constructs a new model named “Weighted Multi-regional Hypothetical Extraction Method (WMHEM)” based on a multiregional input-output model. It not only solves the problems of traditional HEM methods such as improper use of assumptions, excessive reliance on industry intermediate input, but also accurately reflects the impact of external shocks on the inter-industry linkages. By using the monthly economic data of each provinces in China during COVID-19 (except Hong Kong,Macao and Taiwan) an the latest Multi-regional input-output tables, the “economic negative effect” and “CO(2) emission positive effect” under COVID-19 in China are measured. Results show that COVID-19 lockdown was estimated to have reduced China's CO(2) emissions substantially between January and March in 2020, with the largest reductions in February. With the spread of coronavirus controlled, China's CO(2) emissions rebounded in April. In addition, key emission reduction sectors and key development encouraged sectors are selected by combining “economic negative effect” and “CO(2) emission positive effect” during COVID-19. Therefore, policies recommendations are put forward based on forward and backward linkages respectively which are from two ends of the supply chain to turn pandemic-related CO(2) emissions declines into firm climate action. Elsevier Ltd. 2022-11-15 2022-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9482555/ /pubmed/36160312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134080 Text en © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Wen, Wen Li, Yueyang Song, Yu Assessing the “negative effect” and “positive effect” of COVID-19 in China |
title | Assessing the “negative effect” and “positive effect” of COVID-19 in China |
title_full | Assessing the “negative effect” and “positive effect” of COVID-19 in China |
title_fullStr | Assessing the “negative effect” and “positive effect” of COVID-19 in China |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing the “negative effect” and “positive effect” of COVID-19 in China |
title_short | Assessing the “negative effect” and “positive effect” of COVID-19 in China |
title_sort | assessing the “negative effect” and “positive effect” of covid-19 in china |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9482555/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36160312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134080 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wenwen assessingthenegativeeffectandpositiveeffectofcovid19inchina AT liyueyang assessingthenegativeeffectandpositiveeffectofcovid19inchina AT songyu assessingthenegativeeffectandpositiveeffectofcovid19inchina |