Cargando…

Health Impact Assessment: A Missed Opportunity for MCH Professionals in Their Quest to Address the Social Determinants of Health

INTRODUCTION: Public health professionals, especially ones concerned with maternal and child health (MCH), need to engage in cross-sector collaborations to address social determinants of health. Health Impact Assessment (HIA) systematically brings public health perspectives into non-health decision-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dills, James E., Lawson, Taylor M., Branscomb, Jane, Mullenix, Amy, Lich, Kristen Hassmiller
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9482588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35072867
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10995-021-03350-w
_version_ 1784791488157188096
author Dills, James E.
Lawson, Taylor M.
Branscomb, Jane
Mullenix, Amy
Lich, Kristen Hassmiller
author_facet Dills, James E.
Lawson, Taylor M.
Branscomb, Jane
Mullenix, Amy
Lich, Kristen Hassmiller
author_sort Dills, James E.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Public health professionals, especially ones concerned with maternal and child health (MCH), need to engage in cross-sector collaborations to address social determinants of health. Health Impact Assessment (HIA) systematically brings public health perspectives into non-health decision-making contexts that influence social determinants. Alignment of MCH and HIA practice has not previously been documented. METHODS: An exploratory review of HIAs conducted in the United States considered several dimensions of MCH-HIA alignment and produced data to test the hypothesis that HIAs involving MCH stakeholders are more likely to address MCH populations and relevant measures. The review examined three key variables for each HIA: inclusion of MCH-focused stakeholders, level of focus on MCH populations, and presence of MCH-relevant content. RESULTS: Of the 424 HIAs included in the database of US HIAs, 350 were included in this review. Twenty-four percent (84) included MCH-focused stakeholders, and 42% (148) focused on MCH populations. Ninety percent (317) included metrics or content relevant to at least one Title V National Performance Measure (NPM). HIAs that clearly included MCH stakeholders had seven times the odds of including both a focus on MCH populations and at least one NPM-relevant topic compared to HIAs that did not clearly include MCH stakeholders (OR 6.98; 95% CI 3.99, 12.20). DISCUSSION: Despite low engagement of MCH stakeholders in HIAs, many still consider MCH populations and measures. Intentional engagement of MCH workforce in HIAs could ensure greater alignment with existing MCH priorities (such as addressing the social determinants of health and equity) in a given jurisdiction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9482588
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94825882022-09-19 Health Impact Assessment: A Missed Opportunity for MCH Professionals in Their Quest to Address the Social Determinants of Health Dills, James E. Lawson, Taylor M. Branscomb, Jane Mullenix, Amy Lich, Kristen Hassmiller Matern Child Health J Article INTRODUCTION: Public health professionals, especially ones concerned with maternal and child health (MCH), need to engage in cross-sector collaborations to address social determinants of health. Health Impact Assessment (HIA) systematically brings public health perspectives into non-health decision-making contexts that influence social determinants. Alignment of MCH and HIA practice has not previously been documented. METHODS: An exploratory review of HIAs conducted in the United States considered several dimensions of MCH-HIA alignment and produced data to test the hypothesis that HIAs involving MCH stakeholders are more likely to address MCH populations and relevant measures. The review examined three key variables for each HIA: inclusion of MCH-focused stakeholders, level of focus on MCH populations, and presence of MCH-relevant content. RESULTS: Of the 424 HIAs included in the database of US HIAs, 350 were included in this review. Twenty-four percent (84) included MCH-focused stakeholders, and 42% (148) focused on MCH populations. Ninety percent (317) included metrics or content relevant to at least one Title V National Performance Measure (NPM). HIAs that clearly included MCH stakeholders had seven times the odds of including both a focus on MCH populations and at least one NPM-relevant topic compared to HIAs that did not clearly include MCH stakeholders (OR 6.98; 95% CI 3.99, 12.20). DISCUSSION: Despite low engagement of MCH stakeholders in HIAs, many still consider MCH populations and measures. Intentional engagement of MCH workforce in HIAs could ensure greater alignment with existing MCH priorities (such as addressing the social determinants of health and equity) in a given jurisdiction. Springer US 2022-01-24 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9482588/ /pubmed/35072867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10995-021-03350-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Dills, James E.
Lawson, Taylor M.
Branscomb, Jane
Mullenix, Amy
Lich, Kristen Hassmiller
Health Impact Assessment: A Missed Opportunity for MCH Professionals in Their Quest to Address the Social Determinants of Health
title Health Impact Assessment: A Missed Opportunity for MCH Professionals in Their Quest to Address the Social Determinants of Health
title_full Health Impact Assessment: A Missed Opportunity for MCH Professionals in Their Quest to Address the Social Determinants of Health
title_fullStr Health Impact Assessment: A Missed Opportunity for MCH Professionals in Their Quest to Address the Social Determinants of Health
title_full_unstemmed Health Impact Assessment: A Missed Opportunity for MCH Professionals in Their Quest to Address the Social Determinants of Health
title_short Health Impact Assessment: A Missed Opportunity for MCH Professionals in Their Quest to Address the Social Determinants of Health
title_sort health impact assessment: a missed opportunity for mch professionals in their quest to address the social determinants of health
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9482588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35072867
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10995-021-03350-w
work_keys_str_mv AT dillsjamese healthimpactassessmentamissedopportunityformchprofessionalsintheirquesttoaddressthesocialdeterminantsofhealth
AT lawsontaylorm healthimpactassessmentamissedopportunityformchprofessionalsintheirquesttoaddressthesocialdeterminantsofhealth
AT branscombjane healthimpactassessmentamissedopportunityformchprofessionalsintheirquesttoaddressthesocialdeterminantsofhealth
AT mullenixamy healthimpactassessmentamissedopportunityformchprofessionalsintheirquesttoaddressthesocialdeterminantsofhealth
AT lichkristenhassmiller healthimpactassessmentamissedopportunityformchprofessionalsintheirquesttoaddressthesocialdeterminantsofhealth