Cargando…
Health Impact Assessment: A Missed Opportunity for MCH Professionals in Their Quest to Address the Social Determinants of Health
INTRODUCTION: Public health professionals, especially ones concerned with maternal and child health (MCH), need to engage in cross-sector collaborations to address social determinants of health. Health Impact Assessment (HIA) systematically brings public health perspectives into non-health decision-...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9482588/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35072867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10995-021-03350-w |
_version_ | 1784791488157188096 |
---|---|
author | Dills, James E. Lawson, Taylor M. Branscomb, Jane Mullenix, Amy Lich, Kristen Hassmiller |
author_facet | Dills, James E. Lawson, Taylor M. Branscomb, Jane Mullenix, Amy Lich, Kristen Hassmiller |
author_sort | Dills, James E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Public health professionals, especially ones concerned with maternal and child health (MCH), need to engage in cross-sector collaborations to address social determinants of health. Health Impact Assessment (HIA) systematically brings public health perspectives into non-health decision-making contexts that influence social determinants. Alignment of MCH and HIA practice has not previously been documented. METHODS: An exploratory review of HIAs conducted in the United States considered several dimensions of MCH-HIA alignment and produced data to test the hypothesis that HIAs involving MCH stakeholders are more likely to address MCH populations and relevant measures. The review examined three key variables for each HIA: inclusion of MCH-focused stakeholders, level of focus on MCH populations, and presence of MCH-relevant content. RESULTS: Of the 424 HIAs included in the database of US HIAs, 350 were included in this review. Twenty-four percent (84) included MCH-focused stakeholders, and 42% (148) focused on MCH populations. Ninety percent (317) included metrics or content relevant to at least one Title V National Performance Measure (NPM). HIAs that clearly included MCH stakeholders had seven times the odds of including both a focus on MCH populations and at least one NPM-relevant topic compared to HIAs that did not clearly include MCH stakeholders (OR 6.98; 95% CI 3.99, 12.20). DISCUSSION: Despite low engagement of MCH stakeholders in HIAs, many still consider MCH populations and measures. Intentional engagement of MCH workforce in HIAs could ensure greater alignment with existing MCH priorities (such as addressing the social determinants of health and equity) in a given jurisdiction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9482588 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94825882022-09-19 Health Impact Assessment: A Missed Opportunity for MCH Professionals in Their Quest to Address the Social Determinants of Health Dills, James E. Lawson, Taylor M. Branscomb, Jane Mullenix, Amy Lich, Kristen Hassmiller Matern Child Health J Article INTRODUCTION: Public health professionals, especially ones concerned with maternal and child health (MCH), need to engage in cross-sector collaborations to address social determinants of health. Health Impact Assessment (HIA) systematically brings public health perspectives into non-health decision-making contexts that influence social determinants. Alignment of MCH and HIA practice has not previously been documented. METHODS: An exploratory review of HIAs conducted in the United States considered several dimensions of MCH-HIA alignment and produced data to test the hypothesis that HIAs involving MCH stakeholders are more likely to address MCH populations and relevant measures. The review examined three key variables for each HIA: inclusion of MCH-focused stakeholders, level of focus on MCH populations, and presence of MCH-relevant content. RESULTS: Of the 424 HIAs included in the database of US HIAs, 350 were included in this review. Twenty-four percent (84) included MCH-focused stakeholders, and 42% (148) focused on MCH populations. Ninety percent (317) included metrics or content relevant to at least one Title V National Performance Measure (NPM). HIAs that clearly included MCH stakeholders had seven times the odds of including both a focus on MCH populations and at least one NPM-relevant topic compared to HIAs that did not clearly include MCH stakeholders (OR 6.98; 95% CI 3.99, 12.20). DISCUSSION: Despite low engagement of MCH stakeholders in HIAs, many still consider MCH populations and measures. Intentional engagement of MCH workforce in HIAs could ensure greater alignment with existing MCH priorities (such as addressing the social determinants of health and equity) in a given jurisdiction. Springer US 2022-01-24 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9482588/ /pubmed/35072867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10995-021-03350-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Dills, James E. Lawson, Taylor M. Branscomb, Jane Mullenix, Amy Lich, Kristen Hassmiller Health Impact Assessment: A Missed Opportunity for MCH Professionals in Their Quest to Address the Social Determinants of Health |
title | Health Impact Assessment: A Missed Opportunity for MCH Professionals in Their Quest to Address the Social Determinants of Health |
title_full | Health Impact Assessment: A Missed Opportunity for MCH Professionals in Their Quest to Address the Social Determinants of Health |
title_fullStr | Health Impact Assessment: A Missed Opportunity for MCH Professionals in Their Quest to Address the Social Determinants of Health |
title_full_unstemmed | Health Impact Assessment: A Missed Opportunity for MCH Professionals in Their Quest to Address the Social Determinants of Health |
title_short | Health Impact Assessment: A Missed Opportunity for MCH Professionals in Their Quest to Address the Social Determinants of Health |
title_sort | health impact assessment: a missed opportunity for mch professionals in their quest to address the social determinants of health |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9482588/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35072867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10995-021-03350-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dillsjamese healthimpactassessmentamissedopportunityformchprofessionalsintheirquesttoaddressthesocialdeterminantsofhealth AT lawsontaylorm healthimpactassessmentamissedopportunityformchprofessionalsintheirquesttoaddressthesocialdeterminantsofhealth AT branscombjane healthimpactassessmentamissedopportunityformchprofessionalsintheirquesttoaddressthesocialdeterminantsofhealth AT mullenixamy healthimpactassessmentamissedopportunityformchprofessionalsintheirquesttoaddressthesocialdeterminantsofhealth AT lichkristenhassmiller healthimpactassessmentamissedopportunityformchprofessionalsintheirquesttoaddressthesocialdeterminantsofhealth |