Cargando…
Development and evaluation of a fluidic facemask for airborne transmission mitigation
Recently, a fluidic facemask concept was proposed to mitigate the transmission of virus-laden aerosol and droplet infections, such as SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19). This paper describes an experimental investigation of the first practical fluidic facemask prototype, or “Air-Screen”. It employs a small, high...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9482797/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36158451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2022.110777 |
_version_ | 1784791533493420032 |
---|---|
author | Keisar, David Garzozi, Anan Shoham, Moshe Greenblatt, David |
author_facet | Keisar, David Garzozi, Anan Shoham, Moshe Greenblatt, David |
author_sort | Keisar, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recently, a fluidic facemask concept was proposed to mitigate the transmission of virus-laden aerosol and droplet infections, such as SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19). This paper describes an experimental investigation of the first practical fluidic facemask prototype, or “Air-Screen”. It employs a small, high-aspect-ratio, crossflow fan mounted on the visor of a filter-covered cap to produce a rectangular air jet, or screen, in front of the wearer’s face. The entire assembly weighs less than 200 g. Qualitative flow visualization experiments using a mannequin clearly illustrated the Air-Screen’s ability to effectively block airborne droplets (∼10(0) µm) from the wearer’s face. Quantitative experiments to simulate droplets produced during sneezing or a wet cough (∼10(2) µm) were propelled (via a transmitter) at an average velocity of 50 m/s at 1 m from the mannequin or a target. The Air-Screen blocked 62% of all droplets with a diameter of less than 150 µm. With an Air-Screen active on the transmitter, 99% of all droplets were blocked. When both mannequin and transmitter Air-Screens were active, 99.8% of all droplets were blocked. A mathematical model, based on a weakly-advected jet in a crossflow, was employed to gain greater insight into the experimental results. This investigation highlighted the remarkable blocking effect of the Air-Screen and serves as a basis for a more detailed and comprehensive experimental evaluation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9482797 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94827972022-09-19 Development and evaluation of a fluidic facemask for airborne transmission mitigation Keisar, David Garzozi, Anan Shoham, Moshe Greenblatt, David Exp Therm Fluid Sci Article Recently, a fluidic facemask concept was proposed to mitigate the transmission of virus-laden aerosol and droplet infections, such as SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19). This paper describes an experimental investigation of the first practical fluidic facemask prototype, or “Air-Screen”. It employs a small, high-aspect-ratio, crossflow fan mounted on the visor of a filter-covered cap to produce a rectangular air jet, or screen, in front of the wearer’s face. The entire assembly weighs less than 200 g. Qualitative flow visualization experiments using a mannequin clearly illustrated the Air-Screen’s ability to effectively block airborne droplets (∼10(0) µm) from the wearer’s face. Quantitative experiments to simulate droplets produced during sneezing or a wet cough (∼10(2) µm) were propelled (via a transmitter) at an average velocity of 50 m/s at 1 m from the mannequin or a target. The Air-Screen blocked 62% of all droplets with a diameter of less than 150 µm. With an Air-Screen active on the transmitter, 99% of all droplets were blocked. When both mannequin and transmitter Air-Screens were active, 99.8% of all droplets were blocked. A mathematical model, based on a weakly-advected jet in a crossflow, was employed to gain greater insight into the experimental results. This investigation highlighted the remarkable blocking effect of the Air-Screen and serves as a basis for a more detailed and comprehensive experimental evaluation. Elsevier Inc. 2023-02-01 2022-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9482797/ /pubmed/36158451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2022.110777 Text en © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Keisar, David Garzozi, Anan Shoham, Moshe Greenblatt, David Development and evaluation of a fluidic facemask for airborne transmission mitigation |
title | Development and evaluation of a fluidic facemask for airborne transmission mitigation |
title_full | Development and evaluation of a fluidic facemask for airborne transmission mitigation |
title_fullStr | Development and evaluation of a fluidic facemask for airborne transmission mitigation |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and evaluation of a fluidic facemask for airborne transmission mitigation |
title_short | Development and evaluation of a fluidic facemask for airborne transmission mitigation |
title_sort | development and evaluation of a fluidic facemask for airborne transmission mitigation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9482797/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36158451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2022.110777 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT keisardavid developmentandevaluationofafluidicfacemaskforairbornetransmissionmitigation AT garzozianan developmentandevaluationofafluidicfacemaskforairbornetransmissionmitigation AT shohammoshe developmentandevaluationofafluidicfacemaskforairbornetransmissionmitigation AT greenblattdavid developmentandevaluationofafluidicfacemaskforairbornetransmissionmitigation |